Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Tenet Is Out

Nick Gillespie | 6.3.2004 11:03 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

CIA Director George Tenet has resigned, reports USA Today, citing the standard "personal reasons."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Moving Messages

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (34)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. joe   21 years ago

    Personal Reasons = Desire to take up canoeing

    It takes a stout heart to stand by the Czech intel story, and the uranium story.

  2. Gary Gunnels   21 years ago

    Xlrg,

    There is a difference between opposing a particular war, and war in general. If you have evidence on the matter of “yellowcake affair” that is contrary to the general opinion on the matter, then please provide it.

    To be blunt, for those who opposed the war and those who favored it, evidence is used in a slippery manner, and it appears to be more of a prop for particular ideologies or statements of faith that they may hold. Much of it – though mythical in nature – takes on a veneer of “truth,” like most historical memory. Thus, only when the rubber meets the road are the complicated nature of such “truths,” be this a matter of their validity or not, comes to light. An example of this sort of thing is the Patriot Missile in GWI, that is its initial reception, then re-assessment.

  3. thoreau   21 years ago

    I’ll be very curious to read the tell-all book.

    Or maybe he’ll be paid for his silence with a nice phat, cushy job at a well-connected company.

  4. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    Xrig,

    From:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3056626.stm

    On Tuesday, the White House for the first time officially acknowledged that the Niger claim was wrong and suggested it should not have been used in the president’s State of the Union speech in January.

    In his keynote speech to Congress in January, the President said: “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

    But the documents alleging a transaction were found to have been forged.

    Mr Blair defended the assessment…(saying the) evidence did not come from these documents, they came from separate intelligence,”

    However, Mr Blair did not specify what that separate intelligence was.

    ” Separate intelligence”,”Yeah that’s what I really meant”. “Separate intelligence, Yeah that’s the ticket”

    Ha!
    Only a politician can get away with this kind of BS!

    So Xrig, you’re believing Blair’s obvious duplicity, instead of Bush then?

    Also See: http://www.time.com/time/columnist/karon/article/0,9565,463779,00.htmlhttp://www.time.com/time/columnist/karon/article/0,9565,463779,00.html

  5. JDM   21 years ago

    Rick,

    “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

    “But the documents alleging a transaction were found to have been forged.”

    Do you not see what I see?

  6. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    R C Dean, Matthew Cromer, Xrig

    The lies that went into the push for this war is just another example of the truth that libertarians and conservatives have been telling us for years; that you can’t and shouldn’t trust government!

    In our country, this wisdom goes back to the founders of our Republic.

  7. Dan Spencer, California Yankee   21 years ago

    Tenet?s resignation may have been prompted by the findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee?s report on pre-war intelligence failures. ABCNews reports the findings in the not yet released report on pre-war intelligence failures are ?devastating? for Tenet.

  8. Dan Spencer, California Yankee   21 years ago

    Tenet?s resignation may have been prompted by the findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee?s report on pre-war intelligence failures. ABCNews reports the findings in the not yet released report on pre-war intelligence failures are ?devastating? for Tenet.

  9. anon   21 years ago

    RC Dean:

    “the Iraqi archives are examined”

    make that the Iraqi archives that Chalabi manufactures.

  10. Les   21 years ago

    What Rick said. Thanks, Rick.

  11. Dan   21 years ago

    It was actually fairly cleverly done. The furor over Tenet had faded a bit, so the administration doesn’t appear to be responding to criticism or, heaven forbid, admitting that mistakes were made.

    Tenet was a Clinton appointee, wasn’t he? Why would sacking him have required that *Bush* admit he made a mistake? The only mistake Bush made, with regard to Tenet, was not firing him years ago. That’s the kind of mistake it’s easy to admit to. 🙂

    Bush just doesn’t seem to like firing people. How else can you explain the careers of people like Tenet and Mineta?

  12. Ken Shultz   21 years ago

    Wilson verified that the Niger yellowcake story was bogus. Although Tenet claimed that the CIA had previously warned the White House that the yellowcake story was false, he also took personal responsibility for failing to strike the infamous 16 words from the State of the Union Address.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A11208-2003Sep27&notFound=true

    Trying to justify the invasion of Iraq on the basis of this evidence isn’t just clutching at loose straws, it’s defying gravity.

  13. G. W. Bush   21 years ago

    I wish Tenet had done as good a job of checking as all you hit n’ run posters!

    P.S. Just got my issue with 1600 right on the cover. Laura couldn’t believe her eyes when I showed her!

  14. tomhynes   21 years ago

    Tradesports had a betting line on whether Tenet was going to go by the end of June 04. It traded for months at about 20%,and did not move at all in the last week. In other words, nobody saw this coming, or at least no insider trading. You would think someone in the know would want to make a few bucks.

  15. Dan   21 years ago

    Trying to justify the invasion of Iraq on the basis of this evidence isn’t just clutching at loose straws, it’s defying gravity.

    The British claim that Iraq was trying to buy yellowcake from Africa; Bush cited this as one of many reasons for invading Iraq. The British still stand by this story.

    The evidence does, indeed, suggest that Iraq did not try to buy yellowcake from Niger. Now if only Niger was synonymous with “Africa”, the rest of your argument would actually hold water. 🙂

  16. DanNAlabama   21 years ago

    According to accounts in both The Times of India and India Today, former ISI chief Lt. Gen. Mahmud Ahmad instructed Sheikh to send the $100,000 to Atta.
    Dennis M. Lormel, director of FBI’s financial crimes unit, confirmed the transaction. Not long after, J-e-M’s accounts were frozen.

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26249
    Czech connection mostly rumor. Pakistani connection documented.

  17. Gary Gunnels   21 years ago

    Dan,

    Then where in “Africa” were they trying to buy “yellowcake” from? Surely you can be more specific.

    DannAlabama,

    “Pakistani connection documented.”

    Its claimed; there is no documentation alluded to in the article itself. As to what this has to do with Iraq, I can’t say – since Iraq is not mentioned in the article.

  18. OL   21 years ago

    What? Less than three years after he oversaw the single largest intelligence failure in the history of the United States?

  19. just wondering   21 years ago

    And who’s in?

  20. just answering   21 years ago

    current CIA deputy director, John E. McLaughlin. Temporary. As of July.

  21. Jason Ligon   21 years ago

    I can’t figure out the length of this guy’s career, either, and I usually pooh pooh on the idea that Someone’s Head Must Roll every time something happens. What I judge is recovery after a surprising event, and the CIA has responded poorly since 9/11, too.

  22. Xrlq   21 years ago

    Does “personal reasons” mean a general reason, like “because I suck,” or does it mean something more specific, like “I suck at predicting massive terror attacks and determining how much WMD our enemies have stockpiled?”

  23. Neil Lindsey   21 years ago

    Actually, “personal reasons” means “I’m doing this now so that my name doesn’t come up during the home stretch of the election season”.

    It was actually fairly cleverly done. The furor over Tenet had faded a bit, so the administration doesn’t appear to be responding to criticism or, heaven forbid, admitting that mistakes were made.

  24. You Didn't Know   21 years ago

    Personal Reasons = Dick Cheney.

  25. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    This is disquieting. Tenet actually had some sympathy for the truth.

    From:
    http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=1996

    It was Tenet who fought an unsuccessful battle to keep claims of an Iraqi nuclear program not far from success out of the President’s 2003 State of the Union.

    It was Tenet whose Agency was sidelined by the Office of Special Plans (OSP), a division of the Defense Department set up especially to propagandize for war and “stovepipe” cherry-picked (and unverified) intelligence directly to the White House via the office of the Vice President.

    When Perle and his cohorts were concocting tall tales of Al Qaeda’s “links” to the Iraqi government, and Saddam’s mythical quest for Niger “yellowcake,” CIA analysts were outspokenly (if anonymously) debunking these fanciful effusions.

    Even as the CIA was denying it, Perle was busy spreading the fable about an alleged meeting of Mohammed Atta and an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague that turned out never to have happened.

    While Perle was confidently concurring with fellow Defense Policy Board member Ken Adelman’s prediction that the conquest and occupation of Iraq would be a “cakewalk,” a State Department study (shelved by the neocons) accurately foretold the mess we find ourselves in today.

    The neoconservative guru and former chairman of the Defense Policy Board (Perle) says:

    “George Tenet has been at the CIA long enough to assume responsibility for its performance. There’s a record of failure and it should be addressed in some serious way.”

  26. Neb Okla   21 years ago

    …I wonder if the CIA saw it coming. 😛

  27. R C Dean   21 years ago

    Except, Rick, that the Czechs have always stuck by their story that Atta met with the Iraqis, and more and more instances of Saddamite support for terror generally and AQ affiliates in particular come to light as time passes and the Iraqi archives are examined.

  28. Matthew Cromer   21 years ago

    Rick will never admit that Saddam had anything to do with Al Qaeda. Ever.

  29. Xrlq   21 years ago

    And except that the yellowcake bit was never “debunked.” And except that the Brits still stand by the story about attempting to purchase uranium in Niger (which now even Bush basher Joseph Wilson acknowledges). And, and….

    Reasoning with a peacenik is a fool’s errand.

  30. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    Matthew Cromer,

    I’ll “admit” what the evidence permits. Also, it’s not “anything” that’s the question here. It’s a working relationship that threatens the US. There is just no evidence.

  31. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    R C Dean:

    The Atta-Czech story has ever increasing big problems:

    http://www.gacerny.blogspot.com/2004_06_01_gacerny_archive.html#108610295513976530

    From the June 1st thread, ?Atta Boy?, which I notice that you didn?t post on. 😉

  32. Les   21 years ago

    R.C., it seems to me that if there was anything at all to the “Czech connection,” the administration would be crowing about it every chance it got. The last time Cheney brought it up, Bush made sure to state that there was no evidence of a working Iraqi/Al Quaeda connection.

    Xrlg,

    There are a lot of military and ex-military folks (NOT peaceniks, by any stretch) who disagreed with this war, the way it was sold, and the way it’s been conducted.

  33. John Hensley   21 years ago

    Tenet has never been shy about going before congressional committees and declaring his incompetence for all to hear. What the heck took so long?

    and yes, Bush should take heat for keeping him around for so long.

  34. joe   21 years ago

    Has anyone else noticed that that hawkish discussion of, for example, the African yellowcake story has morphed from “this is a reason we must go to war right now” to “it wasn’t a lie, exactly?”

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!