Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Someone must have traduced Joseph K.

Tim Cavanaugh | 3.19.2004 10:48 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

New at Reason: Captain James Yee was accused of spying against the United States. It turns out he was just looking at dirty pictures. Does he still deserve the death penalty? Jacob Sullum judges the rush to judgment.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Stupid Lawsuit of the Day

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. anon   22 years ago

    I have become throroughly convinced that the inmates are running the asylum. So we go from espionage to dirty pictures oops I forgot the extra marital affair. I am retired military and I am ashamed of what they are doing to Capt Yee.
    The more I read and what the Crawford Village Idiot and his administration is doing to our country the more I am convinced that what this country needs is a good enema to get the shit for brains out of office.

  2. joe   22 years ago

    I don't get the headline.

    Joseph Kennedy?

  3. thoreau   22 years ago

    joe-

    I think it's a Kafka reference.

    I suppose a devil's advocate could say something along the following lines:

    "In espionage cases the gov't usually tries to get a defendant to plea bargain, because going to trial requires that the gov't reveal classified information. It's possible that Yee was involved in espionage, and that he revealed so much useful information that the gov't has agreed to whitewash his case and give him an honorable discharge."

    And we can't rule that out. But unless we see some evidence of that, I'm inclined that it's a case of bureaucrats being unable to admit they were wrong, so the need something, anything, to charge him with.

  4. Lee   22 years ago

    Anyone else think "only hundreds of pics of porn?"

    must have burned the rest to CD 🙂

  5. jsanchez@reason.com   22 years ago

    Yeah, it's the first line of "The Trial." I've also seen it rendered "Someone must have been spreading lies about..." which I'd prefer as a standalone sentence on purely aesthetic grounds, but creates a very different feel to the opening.

  6. shanep   22 years ago

    It was just announced that all charges against Lee have been dropped.

  7. Lee   22 years ago

    Just saw the news myself.

    I think that is about as much as we can hope for an apology by the military.

    If anything that guy deserves a medal for putting up with this #&^#(# and staying in the military.

  8. Jennifer   22 years ago

    Thoreau-

    Hmm, yes, I see your point. Well, I already said I don't know how to word my law, but basically I want to avoid THIS scenario: suppose the government is investigating you because, they say, they think you are taking bribes or helping Al-Qaeda. You're arrested, your name hits the papers, everybody in America hates you. . .and then it turns out you were NOT doing any of this. Oh, shit, says the government. We've put this guy through hell for the past several months, and if we admit he was innocent we'll look like assholes. So we'll charge him with. . .uh. . .let's dig through his entire life and see what minor misdemeanors we can find.

    No matter who you are, SOMETHING will turn up, especially if you are in the military and can face criminal charges for things that are not otherwise illegal.

    I think you see what I'm talking about, here. Anybody have any suggestions of how to express such a law in words?

  9. Jack   22 years ago

    [warsie]But if we allow heathen Muslims to get away with having sex with Christian women, that means the terrorists have won![/warsie]

  10. Karl Kraus   22 years ago

    maybe it was *BAD* porno. you know, the picture of Janet Jackson's codfish as a breast or something.

    Karl

  11. garym   22 years ago

    Even in dropping the charges, the government isn't admitting it never had a case against Yee, but is claiming "national security concerns that would arise from the release of the evidence" as the reason for not prosecuting.

    The scary possibility is that the government will tell us next that since "national security concerns" are preventing the prosecution of spies, it will need to go to secret trials.

  12. Jennifer   22 years ago

    I wish someone would pass a new law. I'm not sure exactly how to word it, but it'd be something like this: "If the government or military is investigating you for treason or any other serious felony, you can ONLY be charged with serious felonies relating to that investigation."

    I'm sick of all these butt-saving charges: "Wen Ho Lee was spying for China and faces the possible death penalty. . . no, wait, we charged him with improper handling of a computer disc. James Yee was spying for Al-Qaeda and is guilty of treason. . . no, wait, he was just looking at naughty pictures." Can't nail them for treason? Charge them with jaywalking.

    How does that stupid song go?
    "Proud to be an American, where at least Ah know Ah'm free.
    That is, so long as my last name, doesn't rhyme with 'eee.'"

  13. thoreau   22 years ago

    Jennifer-

    There's only one problem with your law: Say I'm a gov't employee doing some good old-fashioned bribe-taking or embezzlement. It isn't treason. (OK, it's a betrayal, but not in the same sense as treason, even though it is a very serious crime.) But while doing my bribes or whatnot I make a point of having some clandestine meetings with an Arab guy. He isn't a terrorist, just some random guy that I know. And when I meet with him I hand him (empty) manilla folders with the word "Secret" stamped on them and some computer disks (blank). Sure looks like I'm a spy.

    But all I'm doing is taking bribes from defense contractors to make sure their no-bid cost-plus contracts aren't scrutinized. And the gov't would look really silly for starting off saying "Thoreau is at the center of a massive spy ring bigger than even the Rosenbergs or Benedict Arnold" and finishing with "Thoreau took $40k to cover-up some cost over-runs by Halliburton."

    Then again, if I'm going to cover for Halliburton I guess there are easier ways to avoid getting charged. For instance, I could become Vice President...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

AI Chatbots Might Already Be Better Than Humans at Debating

Ronald Bailey | From the October 2025 issue

Brickbat: Stoking Eire

Charles Oliver | 9.15.2025 4:00 AM

Desi Arnaz's Revolution Was Televised

Steven Kurtz | 9.14.2025 6:00 AM

Florida Applies for Federal Reimbursement for 'Alligator Alcatraz' Costs Despite Court Warning

C.J. Ciaramella | 9.13.2025 7:00 AM

This Protein Powder Is Made Out of Air and Uses 600 Times Less Water Than Beef

Jeff Luse | From the October 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300