The Conclusion, in Which Nothing is Concluded
New at Reason: A Hamlet-like young lawyer, the never-popular Ink Man, and another damning memo all make appearances as the defense rests and Elizabeth Koch's coverage of the Martha Stewart trial approaches closing arguments.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Martha doesn't get much attention here at H&R but I'm reading the blog every day. And that's a good thing
It's always "Martha, Martha, Martha." (Seventies sitcom, JB)
Please, no more Martha. Really, I just don't care about the queen of home-ec.
Why not at least equal it out with something on Kobe Bryant or Scott Peterson??
Because the Kobe and Scott Peterson cases have nothing to do with the government using them as scapegoats, where it's possible that's all they're prosecuting Martha for. You don't have to read the article or the blog on the article.
Of course you also have the right to complain about both. 🙂
The face is back!
Couldn't you switch with a picture of a muffin or a soup ladle, anything but the face!
Welcome to Martha News Network, your 24-hour thread on an issue that no one really cares about.