The Conclusion, in Which Nothing is Concluded

New at Reason: A Hamlet-like young lawyer, the never-popular Ink Man, and another damning memo all make appearances as the defense rests and Elizabeth Koch's coverage of the Martha Stewart trial approaches closing arguments.

Comments

[Warren]

Martha doesn't get much attention here at H&R but I'm reading the blog every day. And that's a good thing

[Fred]

It's always "Martha, Martha, Martha." (Seventies sitcom, JB)

[Brady]

Please, no more Martha. Really, I just don't care about the queen of home-ec.

Why not at least equal it out with something on Kobe Bryant or Scott Peterson??

[J. Alexander Lowman]

Because the Kobe and Scott Peterson cases have nothing to do with the government using them as scapegoats, where it's possible that's all they're prosecuting Martha for. You don't have to read the article or the blog on the article.

Of course you also have the right to complain about both. 🙂

[Douglas Fletcher]

The face is back!

Couldn't you switch with a picture of a muffin or a soup ladle, anything but the face!

[at the end of my rope]

Welcome to Martha News Network, your 24-hour thread on an issue that no one really cares about.