"Sleeping With the GOP"
Here's something different: a story in The Village Voice that says that Roger Stone, "the longtime Republican dirty-tricks operative," is "financing, staffing, and orchestrating the presidential campaign of Reverend Al Sharpton."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What was Stone's involvement in Watergate>
Why doesn't the Democratic Party kick Sharpton out?
Raise your hand if this surprises you and Charlie will come by and kick you in the nuts because you are an idiot.
^What he said. Sharpton was a big Al D'Amato fan. Figures.
I tried (and failed) to get Matt Welch on this, but I guess he's still cashing those GOP checks from his fawning coverage of the Nader 2000 campaign!
I'm shocked, thoreau. Your actions at the polls have impacts beyond the way they make you feel. Why aren't you doing whatever you can to end the Bush administration?
You're thinking like a Naderite.
It seems to me that Sharpton only hurts the Dems if he runs third party and steals votes in crucial swing states. I don't see how his presence in the primaries hurts the Dems. If he peels off liberal voters in the primaries then the centrists fare better in the primaries. As long as he endorses the eventual nominee the Dems aren't hurt.
Now, knowing how things are around here, I should issue the disclaimer that I'm not praising any of the Dems, and I pledge to vote for the Libertarian candidate this November. I'm simply expressing bafflement over how this hurts the Dems.
Joe-
No, a Naderite would say that there's no difference between Kerry and Bush so we should all vote Green this fall. I'm saying that Sharpton's actions in the primary are pretty harmless to the Dems if he endorses the Democratic nominee in the end.
It's not your comment on Sharpton that's the problem. It's that you'd pass up a chance to end the Bush presidency.
Joe-
I don't live in a swing state. I can afford to vote third party.
> Sharpton only hurts the Dems if he runs third party