Lawless Newsracks
I'm a couple weeks late in noting it, but Cynthia Cotts has an interesting article in the Village Voice about New York regulators' war on newsracks. A sample:
What the publishers did not think they were getting was a zero-tolerance policy that makes it all but impossible for them to distribute their products. Reps testified that unforeseen forces can put them out of compliance at any moment, including bad weather, store owners who push boxes away, and bigots who routinely trash gay and ethnic boxes.
While large companies resent the time and money spent on a Kafkaesque appeals process, the burden is even greater for smaller businesses. According to New York Press publisher Charles Coletti, who has received fines of almost $100,000, the cost of compliance includes paying employees to inspect the boxes, paying a cleaning contractor, and paying an attorney to handle appeals. For Manhattan Media, which publishes Our Town and West Side Spirit, fines of $30,000 could mean losing a reporter. For ethnic communities, the law threatens to put their only editorial voices out of business.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And here I thought a "newsrack" was the chestular region of one of the cable news info-babes.
Yet another genius move by NY... Every time I think I might really want to move back to Buffalo, something reminds me why I ran like hell.
It's the MANHATTAN Spirit, goddammit! It hasn't been called the West Side Spirit since the eighties.
Tim, Are you from NY? It's still the West Side Spirit as evidenced by the masthead. Go to manhattanmedia.com to see (or click on my link).
It was the MS when I worked for it, and there was always heartache when it was still popularly referred to as the WSS. Maybe they changed it back. By any name, it's a piece of shit.
Also, unless there's been a massive change in Manhattan Media's pay scale, a $30,000 fine would actually mean losing 30,000 reporters.
NYC really stepped in it here. There is a lot of case law recognizing first amendment protection of newspaper boxes, so news racks have a strong affirmative defense.
Goes to show that the impact, as opposed to intent, standard for civil liberties violations is pretty damn important.
Can't anybody say 'effect' anymore? I hate hearing 'impact' as a verb. Impact is what happened when the house landed on the witch.
There, I feel better now.
It's a stupid, unnecessary measure. The newsracks are harmless, and what's New York without some visual clutter? I reckon they could have a milder regulation that would bar them from extremely congested or narrow patches of sidewalk, or maybe restrict the most garish colors, but any kind of crackdown just seems to be a sop to Hudson News and to the contractors and BID people behind those big permanent racks.
However, one thing I don't imagine it affects much is the ethnic press. Save for the Amsterdam News and a couple of the biggest Spanish-language and Jewish papers (which are hardly "ethnic" in a city where huge proportions of the populace are Spanish speakers and Jews), aren't most of them distributed through newsstands or the usual free-paper pickup points like grocery stores and takeout entrances? Aren't they available at newsstands?
doug - the impact of your post had an effect on me, really.
mr. koppelman - some of them are. depends on the borough.
but this is a total BID fuckover.
I hate hearing 'impact' as a verb.
Uh ... not that it matters, but wasn't Joe using it as an adjective? Modifying "standard"?
Doug, language changes. Your grandkids are going to "ax" you questions. Deal.
My bet:
Nearly every one of the papers in those racks has gleefully advocated similar or in fact worse regulation on a myrida of other industries, and have poo-poo'd those industries' complaints about the cost of the regulation.
All I can say is what goes around comes around, or, as Ayn Rand would say, "Brother, you asked for it"
you mean, "axed for it."
Tim, You're right, the WSS (It really has been called that for the past few years) is a piece of garbage, especially Malachy McCourt's column. But it cleans windows like nobody's business.
Warren, You're partially right. Take AMNewYork for example. This is the new free daily from Tribune Co. and they're fighting this newsbox regulation vigorously (as they have been doing on a larger scale for federal media ownership regulations). I think this needs to be balanced against the publication of such claptrap as Robert Scheer in their LA newspaper. ON balance, their legal muscle has increased the freedom of speech for everyone. The Voice on the other hand, has been digging its own grave as you state.
If my kids or grandkids EVER 'aks' me anything, it might just be the last thing they ever say. Language may change, but that doesn't excuse people for being lazy-ass know-nothings. People can still speak correctly. It doesn't hurt. It just takes a little bit of effort. To not do it plainly shows your disrespect for people you're talking to.
Ok, Language Police Mode off
Jesse's right. Sorry, everybody. Impact still sucks as a verb, though.