Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Ken Slater

Donate

The Proud, The Few, The New Iraq Army

Nick Gillespie | 12.11.2003 1:38 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Three hundred of 700 American-trained troops have quit the new Iraqi army, reports CNN.

The reasons include "unhappiness with terms, conditions and pay and with instructions of commanding officers."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Be In

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (20)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. anon   22 years ago

    "unhappiness with terms, conditions and pay and with instructions of commanding officers."

    i.e. no raping, stealing, beating, gassing, murdering, looting or kicking their own people.

  2. R. C. Dean   22 years ago

    Technically, I suspect that the correct term is "desertion", not "quit", as in "300 of 700 Iraqis deserted the new Iraqi army."

    I understand desertion is an old and respected tradition in the Iraqi military, so this is more of a "dog bites man" story.

  3. junyo   22 years ago

    And of course all the people saying "See, I told you this was a bad idea, we need to get out..." harasses the administration into a patently bad decision:

    "...the Pentagon and the Coalition Provisional Authority were discussing recalling some units of the former Iraqi army."

    Yeah, the population's gonna be real happy to see their "liberators" put guns back into the hands of their former oppressors/assailants. We're gonna pull out too quick so Bush can look good and try to win the election and 20 years from now we'll be going back to nuke some nutjob that was drawing a check from the US in '04.

  4. Ice Cold   22 years ago

    How many US recruits quit before, during, or after bootcamp? 1/3 does not sound unrealistic. This article is painting Iraqi recruits as wimps, but Amercians can be wimps, too. 🙂

  5. Carl Sagan   22 years ago

    Why are we pulling out so quick? Is this Iraqi Interruptus?

  6. burghboy   22 years ago

    Now class, altogether, can you say, "ARVN"? Good... now, our next history lesson...

  7. Ruthless   22 years ago

    We're gonna pull out too quick so Bush can look good and try to win the election and 20 years from now we'll be going back to nuke some nutjob that was drawing a check from the US in '04.
    Posted by junyo at December 11, 2003 02:19 PM

    Adjust your timing: maximum "sierra" will hit the fan right about election time '04 which is why Gore will be Dean's VP.

  8. Jean Bart   22 years ago

    Hmm, it sounds like the American army during the Revolution. 🙂

  9. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    One of those guys could be president of Iraq thirty years from now. Are any of them working on somebody's congressional campaign? 😉

  10. Steve in CO   22 years ago

    Ruthless,

    Hearing rumors that Hillary could be Dean's VP pick...

    Wouldn't THAT be interesting?

    Regards,

    Steve

  11. Ruthless   22 years ago

    Hillery as Dean's VP just doesn't make sense to me. For one thing, Slick moving in to the VP's digs? Nah.
    Who does that "futures market" predict as VP?

  12. Warren   22 years ago

    a) DUH

    b) Pulling out now is the best option left because; we already fucked ourselves. The longer we stay the more fucked we get.

    c) "How many US recruits quit before, during, or after bootcamp? 1/3 does not sound unrealistic." Yes. It's apples and oranges but US military DOR rates are nowhere near that high. (They couldn't afford to be)

    d) The current struggle for power over the Democratic Party is between the Clintons and the Gores. Therefore, Al's endorsement ensures no veep offer to Hellery, and likely a Dean/Gore ticket.

  13. joe   22 years ago

    A few months ago, Dean described his ideal running mate. Somebody who knows Washington and Capitol Hill; somebody to provide geographic balance; and someone who is a minority and/or a woman.

    So let's see. Minority woman. From the South. Spent time in Congress.

    Oh my God - CYNTHIA MCKINNEY! RUN AWAYYYYYY!!!!!

  14. burghboy   22 years ago

    A few months ago, Dean described his ideal running mate. Somebody who knows Washington and Capitol Hill; somebody to provide geographic balance; and someone who is a minority and/or a woman.

    Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr.: knows Washington, geographic balance, is a minority

    Gen. Wesley Clark: knows Washington, geographic balance, has no balls = is a woman

    Hillary Clinton: knows Washington too well, no geographic balance (native New Yorker, right?), may be a woman (we need to check with Janet Reno on this one)

  15. Howard Owens   22 years ago

    I think Dean is going to want to get a Hawkish Dem to counter his pandering-to-angry-left image.

    Hillary won't take the job because she wants to be president herself, and she won't risk getting on a losing ticket.

    Gore won't do it because he's already been VP and it wouldn't play well when he runs in 2008.

    That leaves Joe Biden.

    H.

  16. mike   22 years ago

    Just curious, Joe, but how ugly do you think Hillary is going to be in four years?

    I'm guessing that Hillary circa 2008 will be about as homely as Chelsea circa 1992. But without the braces.

    And having balls on the battlefield and balls in Washington are two unrelated characteristics. They may even be mutually exclusive. (See: Eisenhower, Grant)

  17. joe   22 years ago

    What kind of prick says a war hero career soldier who spent months recovering from wounds received on the battlefield has "no balls" because of his politics?

    Wesley Clark would stomp your fat ass into hamburger-boy. Then again, so would Hillary Clinton.

  18. Douglas Fletcher   22 years ago

    I don't know what's going on in the Iraqi 'army,' but I do remember from my days with the US Navy that what kept me in mostly was the fact that I'd signed a binding contract with them that said I couldn't quit under any circumstances. And as I fulfilled that contract, there were many circumstances under which I would have quit.

    Sounds like the Iraqi army needs a new contracts lawyer, maybe.

  19. Douglas Fletcher   22 years ago

    If Hillary Clinton is going to be stomping anybody it'll going to be with her own huge ass.

    Just curious, Joe, but how ugly do you think Hillary is going to be in four years? Do you think it will be a campaign liability?

  20. Kane Ian   21 years ago

    EMAIL: nospam@nospampreteen-sex.info
    IP: 212.253.2.205
    URL: http://preteen-sex.info
    DATE: 05/21/2004 06:12:34
    Study as though you will not reach, as if you may lose it.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 505 donors, we've reached $306,195 of our $400,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

New Car Prices Hit $49,766 in October. Rolling Back Fuel Economy Regulations Could Bring Relief.

Jeff Luse | 12.4.2025 5:51 PM

Boat Attack Commander Says He Had To Kill 2 Survivors Because They Were Still Trying To Smuggle Cocaine

Jacob Sullum | 12.4.2025 3:15 PM

Hillary Clinton Is Still Blaming TikTok

Robby Soave | 12.4.2025 2:50 PM

The Cyberselfish Revival Shows Libertarianism Continues To Be Misunderstood

Brian Doherty | 12.4.2025 2:00 PM

A Deadly Attack Sparks Broad Punishment for Innocent Afghans

Beth Bailey | 12.4.2025 1:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks