Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Judge Orders Magazine to Reveal Sources

Matt Welch | 12.9.2003 12:07 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Well, at least it?s a case of National Security. Oh, wait?.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Happy Birthday...

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (8)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mark   22 years ago

    He was a public employee, among the highest paid not only at the university but in the entire state of Alabama.

    He (or whoever was in his room) rang up a $1,000 room service tab on a University of Alabama credit card.

    He's an educator responsible for leading the young men under his charge.

    He's a public figure whose behavior reflects on the university community.

    Making a public spectacle of yourself by carousing all night in a titty bar and then going home with a couple of dancers not your wife may not be "relevant" to the game on the field. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't get fired if you're a high-profile public figure, being paid with taxpayer money, for a job that also includes the reasonable expectation that you not damage reputation of the institution that hired you.

    Forget about being drunk and horny. How about just plain stupid?

  2. David McElroy   22 years ago

    In response to the questions about what happened with Price and whether this justified his being fired, here's a bit of background.

    Price had been hired as head football coach at the University of Alabama after the school had gone through a very difficult period of several years. A previous coach's assistants had been accused (by the NCAA) of cheating and the school had been slapped with serious scholarship sanctions. The following coach had left after two years because he didn't want to deal with the aftermath of the cheating scandal. Price was hired to be the one to come in and be a long-term stabilizing influence and fix the problems. By the time he had been on the job for a couple of months, there were rumors swirling of him getting drunk in public and buying drinks for underage university students. (Whether there was any truth to those rumors, I don't know.)

    Price was appearing at a golf tournament in Pensacola, Fla., and had gone down a day early for a public dinner. Afterwards, he apparently went to at least one (and possibly two) strip clubs and got drunk. Dancers at at least one of the clubs claim that he was getting lap dances and continually trying to touch them in other ways. What happened after that is very murky. Price claims that he was too drunk to make it back to the hotel, so an unidentified woman helped him back to the hotel and spent the night in the room with him, although he claims both were fully clothed when he woke up the next morning. Some dancers at the club claimed to have had sex with him, although at least one of them has retracted the claim since then. After Price left for the golf tournament, a woman in the room ordered more than $1,000 in room service food using Price's university-issued credit card. The hotel called Price, and he later returned to pay the bill himself.

    Especially in light of the situation into which he had been hired (and the rumors that had already been circulating), the university president believed he had no choice by to fire him. The university's trustees seem to have been willing to give him another chance, but the president made the decision to let him go. In retrospect, I think it was the right move.

  3. asg   22 years ago

    Not to mention that Alabama does most of its recruiting in the heart of the Bible Belt, and a coach with Price's reputation would have a significant disadvantage when recruiting athletes whose parents and background are religious. So Price's conduct almost certainly would have become a job performance handicap.

  4. Warren   22 years ago

    SI has a first amendment right to print the story. But, that is not a right to commit liable and slander. There's nothing in the first amendment that protects reporters' sources. Apparently there is such protection for "newspaper, television and radio reporters" in Alabama. As far as I'm concerned unnamed sources are the same as no sources. If you don't know who's saying it you can't hold them accountable for having said it.

    So I'm OK with this either way. On the one hand I don't think SI should be given a pass on accountability. On the other hand, Alabama law would clearly insulate USA Today if they had ran the same story. I don't think the technicality of magazine vs. newspaper is relevant here.

  5. JSM   22 years ago

    From what I have followed, Price has several admirable years at Wash State before taking the Alabama job. What he did or didn't do is beyond my cares, but it does seem pretty out of character so give the guy a chance to face his accusers and defend himself. That to me seems to at least have more constitutional protections than to shield accusers under the 1st admendment.

  6. Ig   22 years ago

    Help me out here people. How exactly does this guy partying it up at a strip club and maybe (or maybe not) having sex with two presumably consenting adults in the hotel later justify his firing? Is he the coach of an all girl choir? Based on my observations of many professional atheletes, this would have constituted role modeling?!? Why were his activities off court/field/diamond relevant? Were players involved? Did he show up late and hung-over for the "big game"? If SI is freaked out about having to reveal sources that accused him of this behavior, perhaps they should have considered that before dumping his personal life onto the pages of their rag. Arent they supposed to be talking about sports? I don't recall seeing beer swilling or stripper humping in the last Olympics. Although that might make them more interesting. ...Maybe in the winter games...

  7. grizzly   22 years ago

    If I remember this correctly, and if I'm not someone set me straigt, the tab for all of his fun was on the Universities dime. And it was a pretty big tab.

  8. Grindle Alex   21 years ago

    EMAIL: draime2000@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://www.enlargement-for-penis.com
    DATE: 01/26/2004 03:24:41
    Love can damage more than you can heal with drinking.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!