Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Double Red-Meat Quotient

Jesse Walker | 11.12.2003 10:59 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's a zero tolerance story and a blog censorship story. Dig in.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Land We Belong To Is Grand

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Matt Welch   22 years ago

    For those interested in the subject, I wrote a long article in March 2001 about the tensions between off-campus online speech and school-safety concerns. Even back then, there was some new story literally every week. One kid who was driving his school nuts was a guy named Sergio Bichao, New Jersey's teen Matt Drudge, who used his website to hammer away at zero-tolerance polices at his school & mismanagement at his local school board. Earlier this year, during his freshman year in college, he won election to that school board, becoming (I think) the youngest person in state history to do so. Fascinating character.

  2. JSM   22 years ago

    I dread to think what might happen to a kid who is found at the library reading Soldier of Fortune mags! I imagine the school SWAT team arresting him/her at gun point.

  3. Mark Fox   22 years ago

    That the kid was not at, or even commuting from school makes this example more dangerous/silly.

    The action is founded on the notion that by punishing "bad" thoughts, the Powers can stop people from thinking them.

    Principal Conners-Harris, Do Not Think of a pink elephant blowing anthrax spores from its trunk...

  4. Mr. Nice Guy   22 years ago

    I forget what physics guru said this, but "energy is never destroyed, it only takes on a different form".. this energy being the overwhelming human compulsion to control the actions of others. The good news is, that we'll have plenty to bitch about here until the end of time..

  5. Jeff Smith   22 years ago

    A buddy and I wrote parodies of our high
    school's fight song (the plight song) and
    alma mater (the what's the mater) after
    the football team went 0-8. We made copies
    and handed them out on campus one day. By
    lunch time I was in the vice principals
    office. The deal I was offered was that I
    would get physical protection from the jocks,
    who were not so much into discussions about
    these matters, only if we withdrew all the
    copies and stopped circulating any more.
    I took the deal, but it should never have
    been offered.

    Did I mention that the principal of the
    school, who routinely wore a red and gold
    suit to show his school spirit, had a Ph.D.
    in education?

    Jeff

  6. trainwreck   22 years ago

    They really oughtta kill that principal.

  7. StMack   22 years ago

    Sometimes stories like this make we want to crawl under a rock and hide from society. Does anyone know if Ted Kazinski's cabin is on the market?

  8. matt   22 years ago

    Is it just me or is there a story like this at least once or twice a week? It's simply disturbing.

  9. Neb Okla   22 years ago

    I agree it was out of the School's jurisdiction - if they felt it was a problem, they should have handed the investigation over to the police.

    I had to wonder about this statement though (emphasis added):

    "I kept asking, `What does this have to do with school?' " Scaduto said. "They never answered my question. I was completely shocked about it. They were my personal private thoughts and I was getting picked on for them."

    What kind of nitwit thinks that blogging is private?

  10. Jesse Walker   22 years ago

    A nitwit who reads his referral logs.

  11. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    "wasn't school appropriate"? "wasn't appropriate for a journal"?

    1)It wasn't at school; and 2) the content of an off-campus journal is none of their fucking business.

    Kill the dean!

  12. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    I forgot to add, this is just another example of the publik skool social engineers thinking they've been anointed to manage all of society, not just to administer the actual schools.

    I think Ivan Illich said something in "Deschooling Society" to the effect that, if the educational establishment were to survive, it would have to expand its power into society at large.

  13. Neb Okla   22 years ago

    StMack:

    Good question... Whatever did happen to Ted's cabin? It was apparently last seen on a semi-trailer headed to the FBI.

    Since you can buy little sheds at Home Depot, it'd be cool if you could buy your own little "Famous Cabin". Maybe these people would sell you one.

    If you can't afford the $500 or so it would probably cost to make one, you can build a little card-stock model here.

  14. Brian   22 years ago

    I can relate. When I was in 4th grade (in 1971) I got in trouble at school because my friend and I had a snowball fight while walking home from school one day. We were no where near school grounds. Both of us had to write "I will not throw snowballs" 100 times.

    O.K. - so that's not even close to being as serious to this kid's situation, but my experience shows that this sort of uber-parent role that some school administrators adopt isn't a new phenomenon.

  15. Anonymous   22 years ago

    When blogs are outlawed, only outlaws will have blogs

  16. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    Matt,

    I checked out Da Hiller, and it's great. We need a million more like Bichao, making life a living hell for all the cretins in the government schools. Throw a monkey-wrench in the human resources processing line!

    I'm going to add a link on my site, and add your article on it to my "Recommended Readings" page.

  17. Highway   22 years ago

    These things really just make me want to shake my head and ask what the hell is going on. Although it doesn't take much imagination. You really have to wonder, though, as story after story after story after story like this comes out about school's "zero tolerance" policies, do the administrators of other schools and school systems see these stories the same way we do? Are any of them looking at stories like this and saying the same things we are, even privately? Do they even think about reforming their policies so they're not the next national laughingstock? Or do they look at their 'martyred' comrades, pilloried for upholding whatever stupid policy they've enacted, and nod, secure in their delusion that they're doing the right thing For The Children? So much stupidity, and yet it continues, week after week.

  18. Leopold Anastasia   21 years ago

    EMAIL: pamela_woodlake@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://linux-shell-account.1st-host.org
    DATE: 01/20/2004 08:25:40
    Virtue never stands alone. It is bound to have neighbors.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Rebate Plan Will Push America Toward a Hyperprogressive Tax Code

Jared Dillian | 8.20.2025 3:20 PM

Trump's D.C. Goon Squads Are Un-American

Christian Britschgi | 8.20.2025 2:20 PM

Trump's Steel Tariffs Now Apply to Milk and Hundreds of Other Products That Aren't Steel

Eric Boehm | 8.20.2025 2:00 PM

Video Shows Immigration Officers Shooting at a San Bernardino Family's Car. DHS Calls It Justified.

Autumn Billings | 8.20.2025 1:34 PM

25 Percent of Working Age Brits Are Out of Work. Why Is the U.K. Government Paying Millions To Stay Home?

Reem Ibrahim | 8.20.2025 11:20 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300