Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Consumer Drug Advertising is Good for You

Ronald Bailey | 9.23.2003 10:56 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

So says the FDA, according to the Washington Post. Patients prompted by drug ads talk to their physicians about treatments for allergy, arthritis and cholesterol. The most popular question to physicians? Viagra, of course.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "Francolateralism"

Ronald Bailey is science correspondent at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (7)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jason Ligon   23 years ago

    Clueless Joe,

    Did you get your hair cut? Maybe a new car?

  2. Mo   23 years ago

    The drug ads that bother me are the Levitra ones. I have no clue what it does, what it is for or how it will make me throw a football through a tire better. I have no problem with consumer drug ads if they tell you what the damn drug is for.

  3. dude   23 years ago

    "I have no clue what it does"

    Throw a football through a tire . . . it's pretty straightforward symbolism. Maybe their next ad will show a dude driving a bus through a tunnel.

  4. Anonymous   23 years ago

    So you're telling me it will help you relive your youth during a mid-life crisis. That's all my bus driver did - talk about his old football days.

  5. Ayatollah Usoe   23 years ago

    Well, without DTC (direct to consumer) advertising, the doctors have an oligolopy on medicine news. With an informed public, perhaps we can act like consumers making an informed decision rather than cats at the vet.

    Oh, and Levitra? allows you a longer window within which to throw that pass.

  6. Clueless Joe   23 years ago

    If it's good enough for Raphael Palmiero....

  7. cnn   21 years ago

    http://www.cnn.com
    cnn

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is Court Packing Inevitable If Democrats Retake Congress and the White House?

Damon Root | 7.21.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: In-N-Out but Not Thru

Charles Oliver | 7.21.2026 4:00 AM

Research Suggests Trump and His Opponents Are Both Wrong About the Impact of Voter ID Requirements

Jacob Sullum | 7.20.2026 5:25 PM

South Carolina Law Prohibits Tattoo Parlors Near Churches. A New Lawsuit Calls That Unconstitutional.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.20.2026 4:59 PM

Britain's New Prime Minister Andy Burnham Promises 'Stronger Public Control' of Stagnating Economy

Reem Ibrahim | 7.20.2026 2:16 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason