The Rockford Files
Good news: The powers-that-be in Rockford, Illinois, are backing down from the plan, cited here yesterday, to knock down a popular church and replace it with a spanking new jail. Scott Richert has the details:
By mid-afternoon, it appeared that the county was in full contrition mode. County Board Chairman Kris Cohn, State's Attorney Paul Logli, and Sheriff Richard Meyers issued a press release, stating that the county "has no plans to buy and/or destroy St. Mary's Church….The only land that may be impacted by a connecting tunnel or overhead walkway would be … the former grade school building. In the event that particular building is in any way affected, then appropriate and mutually beneficial arrangements will be made to preserve or relocate the heating plant currently located in the former school so as not to disrupt the Church or its congregation."
Here in Rockford, no battle is ever fully over, and while the county board resolution has been changed explicitly to exclude St. Mary's Oratory (but not the school and any other property, including the historic rectory), the resolution also makes a provision for "including any additional property required…" St. Mary's Oratory, however, is the only additional property in the area under consideration. Still, yesterday afternoon the sky seemed a little more blue, and the sun shone a little more brightly than normal. Perhaps Rockford was due for a little good news.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The fact that the sheriff said "impacted" is strong evidence he's a shithead. I guess it's just one of my bizarre pet peeves, but the substitution of "impact" for "affect," "harm" or "influence" is symbolic of what bureaucracy/journalism/advertising has done to the whole language.
Tearing down an active church is such a infinitely stupid idea that I find it difficult to believe it was actually being considered. Has anyone considered the possiblity that the City might have been telling the truth when it said acquiring the "oratory" was never their intent?
How many times has something infinitely stupid been done under the guise of "eminent domain"?
What I mean is, this stands out as particularly stupid even by the standards of poorly thought out eminent domain cases. Really, in a league by itself.