Let the Wine Flow
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit has overturned Michigan's ban on direct shipments of alcoholic beverages from other states, declaring it an unconstitutional barrier to interstate commerce. The court rejected the state's argument that the ban was authorized by the 21st Amendment, finding that it served not to discourage alcohol abuse but to protect local producers and distributors from competition.
Most states still have such laws, which can criminalize such innocent activities as ordering alcoholic beverages from online merchants, joining a beer-of-the-month club, or selling wine to customers in other states. But restrictions on interstate alcohol shipments recently have been defeated in Virginia, Texas, South Carolina, and North Carolina. Challenges are pending in New York, New Jersey, Ohio, and Florida.
The New York case, brought by the Institute for Justice, is scheduled for oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit tomorrow.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Cheers to another barrier to liberty struck down.
IJ - Lawyers you can love.
As a Michigan resident, and a wine lover, I'm looking forward to taking advantage of this. Good news.
As a Michigan resident, and a wine lover, I'm looking forward to taking advantage of this. Good news.
Great news!
I have always considered my contributions to IJ (and Reason Foundation for that matter) well spent. I only wish my corporate employer would match those funds they way they match funds to organizations that confound my efforts.
Score one for the good guys!
Unfortunately, I don't see Maryland on the list of Peoples' Republics slated for a challenge to its own protectionist law. Corruption here is a way of life, and Maryland's legislators love to take money from the protected distributors. Is there a wine-loving Maryland attorney out there ready to take up the mantle?
Please, make this the death knell of the Penna. Liquor Control Board.
The. Worst. Government. Service. Ever.
Amen Tanstaafl. It amazes me it's survived this long, considering I don't know too many people who support it. It would be really nice if we could order wine online. Hell, I'd even settle for being able to buy it in a supermarket.
Uh, if section 2 of the 21st amendment didn't authorize an exception to the commerce clause, what does it do?
--G
Now if only that sort of sanity could be imported. Then I could get my drinkables at the corner store. Oh well, one step at a time.