Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Crippling Lawsuits

Julian Sanchez | 8.13.2003 2:32 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Walter Olson relates the tale of an erstwhile flim-flam man and thief who's discovered that legal theft via Americans with Disabilities Act harassment is far more lucrative. The latest in his long string of lawsuits targets a winery whose dirt paths aren't easily traversed by wheelchair.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Speed Saves

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (5)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Principal Skinner   22 years ago

    "When people ask me if we're compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act yet, I tell them, 'We're closer than ever before.'"

  2. minuteman   22 years ago

    What is truly sad is that the current exploitation of the ADA by so many gold diggers actually hurts the very people the Act was designed for: The veterans who fought our battles for us -- sacrificing eyes, limbs, and Lord knows what else.

  3. Plutarck   22 years ago

    Similarly, minuteman, the definition of "disability" is simply being altered and expanded to cover all sorts of things - what seemed like such a good idea at the time seems like it will inevitably declare being considered unnattractive, having bad breath a disability, having no people skills (ie, being an asshole - "he was abused as a child, you see, so it's not his fault"), and who can even imagine what else as disabilities.

    One can be forgiven for thinking that they don't _want_ people to pay other people for goods or services, such as labor. I know I personally have decided to channel my creative and productive interests more into real-estate partly because at least the people an investor hires there are not employees, but contractors - one is in the role of the consumer, which at least up till now is largely protected from "You can't think that way!" laws (you can choose not to buy something from someone for absolutely any reason whatsoever - consumption and zero-price exchanges is the only place that freedom of association seems to exist anymore). It's just becoming too much of a hassle to worry about some jackass suing you for making some generally unapproved of choice - better to redirect one's efforts to less regulated activities.

  4. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    I wonder how hard it is to get an "Oppositional Defiance Disorder" Dx? I've already got a reputation among my coworkers as having a toxic attitude toward authority. I might as well make it pay--almost as good as faking Tourette's!

  5. stive23   10 years ago

    it's always leave something inconvenient?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Armed, Elderly, and Dangerous

Charles Oliver | 6.2.2025 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!