Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Gentlemen, Start Your Machinations

Matt Welch | 7.23.2003 11:03 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The California gubernatorial recall, once a longshot, is now on, for as early as Sept. 23 (Daniel Weintraub is predicting Oct. 7). Arnold?s still undecided, as is failed 2002 Republican candidate Bill Simon, but expect press conferences to fly in the coming three days.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Berkeley Social Scientists Define Conservatives

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (6)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. a true californian   22 years ago

    Talking about "shots," would it be easier and far less energy consuming if the bastard were simply shot, like they do in the rest of the world.

    I know, I know, this is America, and we are far more "civilized" than that (I think.)

    But still -- all this effort, and money, and time, and energy expended, just to kick some moron out on his ear?

    Sheeeze!

  2. Ron Hardin   22 years ago

    Simon is so lame that people will vote Davis back in. I can't believe he doesn't realize this. Simon could make millions by performing his unique lame style - which beats even Gore's - in TV parodies.

    Incompetence and corruption is better than lameness.

  3. J   22 years ago

    Matt, shouldn't your comments read, "once falsely claimed to be a longshot"?

    Turns out the recall drive was very successful, very quickly with relatively little fiscal support. Good or bad, right or wrong, it did not turn out to be a longshot.

  4. Cheez   22 years ago

    A longshot is what it is, an unlikely gamble that pays off. If you bet on a horse that is a longshot at 100:1, it doesn't become a non-longshot because he's leading by a length and a half just before the finish. Sure, everyone knows he's going to win at that point, but it was the original longshot classification that'll make the other jealous gunkies say, "dam, that longshot sure paid off."

  5. J   22 years ago

    Cheez...that is exactly my point. If a horse with 100-1 odds wins...then the judgement of longshot was wrong, he was obviously a contender. The fact that the recall movement has already gathered about 30% more signatures than it needed means that it was not an "unlikely gamble"; it was likely all along, and also likely that those who reported it as an "unlikely gamble" had a little bias issue going on.

  6. Matt Welch   22 years ago

    I would say that before Issa started funding it, most except a few true believers thought it was a longshot.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!