Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Just Don't Call Me a Wife-Beater

Matt Welch | 7.2.2003 12:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Why is it that Tourette's cases like Ann Coulter can walk around shrieking "traitor!" at everyone to the left of Arnold Schwarzenegger, yet accusers of much less serious crimes face libel and defamation lawsuits? Eugene Volokh has the answer.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "Combat Zones That See"

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. fyodor   22 years ago

    master beater,

    I wonder if Ms. Coulter would agree that she's using treason in a non-criminal sense!

    Also, just because I'm anal retentive, you needn't have added your qualifiers to wife-beating as I don't think anyone would include those activities in wife-beating.

  2. Brendon   22 years ago

    That was an interesting legal beaver answer on Eugene's site. An even better blog is just under it and is on the Lawrence ruling. I want to know why Disney of all people allows a gay baccanal on their property?! And when will they have a straight one? I've had my eye on snow white...

  3. V   22 years ago

    Brendon,

    You and a million others. I had a friend who worked at Disney and said that the number of times the women playing Snow White would get hit on was staggering (mostly middle aged men, but women also, not sure if this was during the gay bacchnal). He said one Snow White told him that on several occasions, she had dated fellow employees, only to find out that instead of wanting her, they had really wanted private sessions with her in costume. Escort services in Orlando take note, but have your lawyers ready.

    If you'd like to enjoy a slightly more lascivious take on Snow White, try Neil Gaiman's "Snow, Glass, Apples."

  4. fyodor   22 years ago

    Brendon,

    Juan seems to equate wanting to shield children from bawdiness with antipathy towards Gays. But if one were to avoid wet t-shirt contests for family vaction trips, it wouldn't necessarily say anything about one's views of Gays to avoid Gay baccanals as well. Still, I suppose that if social conservatives succeed in associating the behavior cited at Gay Day with all defense of Gays and their issues, there's likely a receptive audience in the mushy yet decisive American middle, and his conclusion may prove correct. Personally, Disney can host all the Gay baccanals they like for all I care. I'll get my own kicks on Route 66!

  5. ztv   22 years ago

    I don't know, liberals are the best friends the US government ever had...Ann's probably confusing the US government with some platonic ideal of the American way...

  6. Anonymous   22 years ago

    Oklahoma Man Gets Life in Prison for Spitting
    OKLAHOMA CITY - An Oklahoma man arrested on suspicion of beating his wife faced year in prison and a fine. But when he spit in an arresting officer's face, he got a life sentence instead, officials said on Wednesday

  7. Lucas Wiman   22 years ago

    I doubt that any lawsuit could be made to stick to Coulter. She's a lawyer, and presumably understands the difference between insult and libel (or slander or whatever).

  8. Robert Speirs   22 years ago

    How could anyone who has read "Treason" call Ann Coulter a "Tourette's case"? It's the most calmly reasoned and fact-packed book she's ever written and far from hysterical. She makes a very good case that liberalism is a threat, not just to the US government, but to freedom itself, which is, or should be, or may be some day, the essence of the American way of life.

  9. Junis Chapell   22 years ago

    Our "mixed" economy and the resultant civil war of pressure groups fighting for "special" (collective) rights and privledges; which can only be financed at the expense of violating others "unalienable" rights is the ONLY major threat to freedom.

    This system is supported, engorged and protected by BOTH libs and cons. American Political Ideology is irrelevant. They are both merely different ends of the same side of the coin.

    Neither will deliver freedom - just different forms of statism and collectivism.

    If it were ONLY the just liberals fault - at least there'd be a chance. But these people have us fighting not in support of freedom - as opposed to servitude, but in support of which style of servitude we most prefer.

  10. Anonymous   22 years ago

    Junis, you're a genius! (Seriously.)

  11. Mickey   22 years ago

    Mr."V" says, "If you'd like to enjoy a slightly more lascivious take on Snow White, try Neil Gaiman's "Snow, Glass, Apples."

    Aren't you glad this is a Family Blog?

  12. whacker   22 years ago

    Nobody can beat their wife anymore, because wife-beating is now illegal. But wand-beating is still allowed.

  13. Mickey   22 years ago

    Like I said, aren't you glad this is a Family Blog?

  14. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    V:

    Hmmm.... Did they want her to bring along the glass coffin, too?

  15. Anonymous   22 years ago

    No, that's reserved for Sleeping Beauty.

  16. Boris A.Kupershmidt   22 years ago

    Why is it that every time I find
    casual slanders flung out Ann Coulter's
    way it invariably turns out that the
    hisser is a boring envious mediocrity?

  17. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    Shrieking? She doesn't shriek, she smirks. She issues a venomous pronouncement calculated to produce squeals of outrage, and then pauses to observe the effect with that "ain't I cute" smirk on her face. Considering the proportion of her neocon comrades who are Cold War Liberals, and still believe pretty much the same thing they did thirty or forty years ago under a different name, she's either stupid or disingenuous to turn the foreign policy debate into a "liberal" versus "conservative" thing. And whatever else you say about her, she's not stupid.

  18. Meschersheim   22 years ago

    Kupershmidt ... Kupershmidt. (Hmm.)
    Isn't that German?

    Any relation to Karloff?

  19. I Gotta Say I Have Read This E   22 years ago

    Yes, Matt Welch's characterization of Ann Coulter as a "Tourette's case" who walks around "shrieking" is wildly offbase. I'm not really a big fan of her -- and I think the whole "blond bombshell" description is a stretch -- but whenever I see her she's always engaged in calm, patient logic against interviewers who try desperately to bait her.

    She says fiery stuff once in a while, but all in all she's struck me as scrupulously rational -- infatuated with logic almost to the point of being anal and pedantic. "Shrieking"? No way.

    (But then, what's Matt Welch doing at Reason, anyway? Is he now a libertarian, or just a buddy of Tim Cavanaugh?)

  20. Rusty Lumbar   22 years ago

    Thank heaven for Ann Coulter. Now they can't cavalierly write me off as being part of, "just a bunch of Angry White Males" anymore.

  21. ahnold   22 years ago

    "To strive... to chance... to stare at the finish line far ahead... to take the first step... and in the effort, to have already won."

    Gee, Toto, we're not in Austria anymore.

  22. Neil Block   22 years ago

    I concur with Volokh's conclusions, but that probably doesn't exclude civil suits brought upon accusers of "treason" for such charges as misappropriation of likeness. I could see someone called a "traitor" in Coulter's book using some sort of allegation like that to get back at her without having to rely on the strong burden of proof required for libel suits.

  23. Gene 6-Pack   22 years ago

    Treason includes advocating acts that are injurious to the United States and helpful to an enemy. Some may debate whether the USSR was an enemy of the United States, but I have had personal experience that validated that classification.

  24. master beater   22 years ago

    One can be a traitor or commit treason without violating the law. That which is treasonous, even towards one's country, can be applied to a large number of activities, only a small subset of which meet the legal definition. However, beating one's wife is always a violation of the law (in this country, at present, whether or not it is prosecuted), with the exception of situations of self-defense and the occasional, consentual S&M.

  25. Anonymous   22 years ago

    what was the point of the arnold link?

  26. Anonymous   22 years ago

    he is extreem right. he shoots people without mercy (it has been documented on film)

  27. Matt Welch   22 years ago

    Calmly reasoned, scrupulous rationalism of the day: "The inevitable logic of the liberal position is to be for treason." This is in the last sentence of Ann Coulter's new book, which is an attack on liberals entitled "Treason."

  28. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    How about "USA Patriot doesn't take away any freedoms"?

    All her appeals to visceral hatred of Hillary is just disingenuous. I hate Hillary, Barbra, Rosie &c as much as anyone alive, but you can't sell a statist agenda to me just by making pro forma attacks on them. Hell, Hillary voted FOR the Patriot Act, as did Chuck Schumer.

    Coulter is a statist, an apologist for a permanent warfare state and domestic police state that should be an abomination to real libertarians. But she packages her statism with anti-big government rhetoric and appeals to the hot button symbolism of justifiable populist hatred toward Hillary. It's all done cyncially, to produce effect.

    Why is it that every time somebody is identified as a libertarian hawk, you can count on them regurgitating agitprop from Horowitz, Coulter, and their ilk? I think the neolibertarians and warbloggers have been assimilated into the borg--but as Jim Henley asked, what have they gotten from Bush as compensation for selling out on the neocon foreign policy agenda? Have Ashcroft & Ridge compromised even an iota in the direction of civil liberty? Has Horowitz or Coulter measurably toned down support for the police state as a reward for the libertarian sellout? Nope--they fanatically defend every jackbooted measure of Ass-crap, and squeal for the hides of every "traitor" who questions them.

    As St. Thomas More said, it profits a man nothing to sell his soul for the whole world--but WALES??!

    I eagerly await the (mostly anonymous) bon mots about anti-semitism, conspiracy and tin foil hats that inevitably follow any reference to neocons.

  29. Neolibertarian Warblogger   22 years ago

    Did you know that supporting the war made you a neocon, so you now have to agree with every item of their evil agenda? I didn't. Well now I know. I didn't know I was supposted quote Horowit and Coulter either. I will try to do so in the future.

    I also feel sort of ripped off, because neither Bush, Ridge, Aschcroft, David Horowitz or Coulter never called me personally to ask for my support of the war. That way I could tell them I supported the war and in return I wanted protection of civil liberties....

    YOU ARR RIGHT! I WAS RIPPED OFF! AND SO WERE ALL YOU "LIBERTARIAN" SELL-OUTS! I expect your official libertarian badge on my desk by the morning. You are expelled from the Movement you right-opportunist traitors! Now never speak in support of libertarian ideas again.

  30. Kevin Carson   22 years ago

    You've obviously taken the red pill, Neo.

  31. extreme videos production of r   21 years ago

    Sic volo, sic iubeo - I want this, I order this. (Juvenalis)

  32. StoweBerns Lindsey   21 years ago

    EMAIL: pamela_woodlake@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://free-digital-photo.online-photo-print.com
    DATE: 01/20/2004 08:26:33
    Genius hath electric power which earth can never tame.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Is It 'Harassment' To Heckle Your Local Politician? A British Court Thinks So.

Matthew Petti | 6.3.2025 3:01 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!