Making Mother's Day Weirder
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Too bad the BBC can't report on this.
NOT.
"Outrage has been quick from those one would expect to be outraged..."
how outrageously consistent of 'em.
Great quote in the article:
The main problem with using the technique as a source of eggs for fertility treatments is that the fetus cannot consent to the use of her eggs, Smitz said.
If the fetus has a right to object to medical procedures, she might object to the one that makes her an aborted fetus in the first place.
On a positive note, a woman can have grandchildren without going through the hassle of having children first.
I wonder if Hallmark has a card for this one?
And this is surprising because.....
It's been obvious for years that this could be done. You could take them from cadavers too.
Now if they could just figure out how to mature sperm early, you could have your children and grandchildren at the same time. In theory, I guess you could run through a couple hundred generations in a decade...
I knew this girl once who was breastfeeding her sister.
This could be an Onion column: "Ask a Pro-Life Freegan"