Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Community Standards

Reason Staff | 6.19.2003 11:02 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Chamber of Commerce of Great Neck commissions a history of the town, then insists that sections dealing with slavery and the KKK be deleted. Also getting the axe: passages indicating there are Iranians living in Great Neck.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Libertarian Bush?

Reason Staff
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Grant Gould   22 years ago

    Tim -- On the one hand, Iranians aren't Arabs. On the other hand, I'm sure that the Great Neckians don't know that either.
    --G

  2. Madog   22 years ago

    Hmm, since they've deleted references to the KKK as well, perhaps they're trying to route out all types of Fascism. And, as we all know, Iranians are Aryans, just like the Nazis, and Nazis are the spiritual cousins of the KKK. So really, they're fighting AGAINST racism and fascism, not being racist or fascist themselves.

  3. Tim Stich   22 years ago

    "Tim -- On the one hand, Iranians aren't Arabs."

    You obviously haven't checked the constantly expanding definition of what being "Arab" includes. I used the term "arab" in my pamphlet copy to cover all of the bases.

    Hotel rates are at thier lowest ever. Book now and avoid the rush.

  4. Lawrence   22 years ago

    Tim, try using the term "Islamist" to cover all of your bases. You'll probably be more on target.

  5. swash buckle   22 years ago

    Before you know it, passages indicating there ever were any American aborigines (Indians) living in Great Neck will also be struck from school textbooks -- along with any indications that Dutchies founded their state's largest city.

    And it wouldn't surprise me if the fact that French beaver trappers roamed their fields, would get the axe as well.

    You know, America was once one of the sanest places on earth. Now, with all this PC-nonsense* going on, it's turning into ONE BIG NUT HOUSE -- following in the footsteps of Europe, which is already there.

    (*Political Correctness, for you high school greenhorns.)

  6. Plutarck   22 years ago

    Yet more Orwellian rewriting of history, I see. What a fascinating, and horrifying, sort of thing it all is.

    Kind of hard to learn from history when it has been erased, isn't it? Which, I believe, is quite often the whole point - even if it isn't what's intended.

    So much for the heroic tales of overcoming the past and failure, eh? Whatever happend to those, anyway?

  7. Plutarck   22 years ago

    Adding to swash buckle:

    One must also wonder if it will one day become common to not even know what the holocaust is, perhaps leaving no memory of its actual occurence whatsoever, because it inspires racial and religious enmity. Further slavery will never really have happened, except perhaps Long Long Ago, and only done by Terrible, Terrible, Inhuman Sorts of People, because it too inspires racial enmity and distrust.

    When history is an obstacle to change, then one must simply change it and erase it. Indeed, history is written by the winners - a tale of things which mostly did not occur, brought about by kings who were knaves, executed by soldiers who were fools, doing things which were of little ultimate consequence.

  8. Madog   22 years ago

    I dunno, old history books weren't that great. I came across one from the late 50s that refered to the "diminuative but brave slant-eyed soldiers of the Emperor" in it's section on WWII. And that was just one part of the book.

    Just as bad as the current PC crap in it's own way. It was only when I learned that everyone in history had flaws as well as greatness that I truly enjoyed learning about it.

  9. swash buckler   22 years ago

    "It was only when I learned that everyone in history had flaws as well as greatness that I truly enjoyed learning about it."

    Yeah, me too. But to ERASE all that history?? To simply wipe the slate clean?? That's no worse than book burning.

  10. SB   22 years ago

    Erratum: "That's no better than book burning." (Or, "that is just as bad.")

  11. Evilcor   22 years ago

    You want revisionism?
    I have two editions of a (sort of) history book commissioned by the U.S. Government. The copyright for the first is 1943, the second is 1946.
    In the former, the Nazis are accurately slammed (propaganda is easy against the really evil), while in the latter we discover that the Soviets were also bad guys!
    I can't stress how skillfully the alterations were made. The meaning of whole passages (like the storming of the Mannerheim Line) are changed with only a few words out of place.
    In case you wondered. . . as of 1943 Stalin's duplicitous foreign policy followed by a totally unprovoked invasion of Finland was "strenuous last-minute diplomacy" while in 1946, Stalin was a murdering psychopath bent on world domination.
    I wonder what 'revisions' somebody's cooking up today.

  12. Tim Stich   22 years ago

    It sounds like the Great Neck Chamber of Commerce should have just stuck to writing travel pamphlets.

    Good reasons to visit Great Neck:

    ? nice beaches
    ? friendly folks
    ? no klansmen or arabs
    ? that Great Neck feeling!

  13. boncoeur   22 years ago

    Well, evilcor, as long as we can maintain a (relatively) free world, there will always be other sources we can refer to in order to get the true stories about such hicrimes.

    (We never sleep either.)

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

California Enacts Sweeping Exemption to Development-Killing Environmental Law

Christian Britschgi | 7.1.2025 1:10 PM

Senate Votes 99–1 To Remove AI Moratorium from 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 

Jack Nicastro | 7.1.2025 12:27 PM

Why the 'Current Policy' Baseline Is a Massive Gimmick That Effectively Kills the Filibuster

Eric Boehm | 7.1.2025 12:00 PM

New Jersey Towns Face Setback in Lawsuit Against State's Affordable Housing Mandate

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 11:45 AM

Why the NFLPA Kept Damning Collusion Evidence From Its Own Players

Jason Russell | 7.1.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!