Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Usual Suspects

Reason Staff | 6.6.2003 3:24 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

New at Reason: Jacob Sullum reviews the inspector general's report on the post-9/11 roundup of illegal immigrants.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Like Telling an Italian Not to Wear Cologne

Reason Staff
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Anonymous   23 years ago

    oh yes I'm so troubled that right after 9/11 the FBI didn't round about all the Swedes and Norwegians who were here illegally. What ever were they thinking!

  2. Anonymous   23 years ago

    No doubt brutish, unconstitutional behavior was exhibited. But one must remember that at the time nobody knew what was going down...was it just the planes or was there an entire "land" operation ready to be carried out. The celebrations in nearby Paterson & area coffee shops sure made me wonder.

  3. joe   23 years ago

    I wonder what our anonymous friends above would have thought about rounding up every white male with an accent in Mississippi whenever a lynching occurred.

    "Duh, it's only ok when people are REALLY scared of a certain ethnic group."

  4. R. Stewart   23 years ago

    I see the Clashes of the Cultures are still being waged on this planet. What year is this? The year 2003? Oh wait, of course -- I'm way too early for any sort of harmony.

    Well, I better hop back on my time machine and head back to the year 2053. I didn't realize things were still so primitive here.

  5. Croesus   23 years ago

    BUNIA, Congo (CP) - Hundreds of residents who survived savage tribal fighting last month in this northeastern Congolese town cheered the arrival Friday of French troops, the vanguard of an international force intended to stabilize the volatile Ituri region after more than 500 people were killed.

    Shouting "liberated, liberated," the townspeople gathered outside the headquaters of the U.N. mission to Congo, or MONUC, as several dozen French forces pulled up in camouflage jeeps for a meeting with U.N. officials and the Hema tribal militia that now controls the town.

    http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2003/06/06/105160-cp.html

    Vive la France! 🙂

  6. Anonymous   23 years ago

    great analogy joe..??? And I see Croesus is on topic as usual.

  7. Warren   23 years ago

    I wouldn't support this sort of racist abuse of power even if it truly did manage to nab a few terrorists. But the fact is, that this kind of behavior is precisely the sort of inept policing that allows terrorist to elude capture. In other words, the broad net approach unconscionably oppresses innocent people while making the rest of us LESS safe. Jacob highlights the oppression.

    Go here: http://www.cato.org/dailys/06-05-03.html
    To for an excellent articulation of how this approach is doomed to failure in regards to the proposed TIA database.

  8. Hal E.   23 years ago

    Never mind that these people were unjustly and unconstitutionally imprisoned. What's mind-boggling here is that out more than 700 people who were rounded up -- apparently for the crime of being Muslim -- NOT A SINGLE ONE was found to have links to terrorism. So you have to wonder what the hell the DOJ spokeswoman means when she says, "We make no apologies for finding every legal way possible to protect the American public from further terrorist attacks." Umm, excuse me, but how does arresting 762 non-terrorists protect the American public? It's one thing for the feds to be unconstitutional, but someone should tell Herr Ashcroft that we'd feel a whole lot safer if they weren't so damn incompetent, too.

  9. merdedepoulet   23 years ago

    conclusion: david's funny, joe's scary. just hope joe doesn't track me down and shoot me full of sacrimonious bullets.

  10. Warren   23 years ago

    "merdedepoulet"-HA Now THAT'S funny

  11. david f   23 years ago

    no. no. no.

    we made the world safer. how do we know this is true? this is a bunch of liberals whining about stuff. it's only a cold sore. i'll only put it in part way. i'll still respect you in the morning. i did not have sexual relations with that woman.

    snicker.

    Hey Hal E.,

    you're forgetting that ad hoc or pragmatic (backing into) justification for these actions are done by those who never will get busted for being dark skinned. it's just when czar hillary applies the SAME LAWS to the NRA or that "right to life" group or the re-enactment group for Bull Run, errr, Mannasssassassass (that's worse than "banana" to spell) get busted for terror-type activities. then all of a sudden many of our friends on this site who approve of these measures will be against. rule of men vs rule of law.

    the innocent have nothing to fear. don't worry!

    sarcastically and fed up with overly intrusive government that doesn't make us safer at all (apply these PATRIOT bullshit measures to guns -- no wait, "just enforce the laws that are out there"),

    drf

  12. Anonymous   23 years ago

    David, like Lefty and Joe, has super powers permitting him to know the skin tone of individuals posting to this site.
    He also instinctively knows how all "dark-skinned" people think, 'cause you know they're all the same and he's really down with their view of the world.

  13. joe   23 years ago

    My powers also extend to knowing who you are, chickenshit.

  14. david f   23 years ago

    hey anon!

    you betcha! and i have even more super powers to cloud the minds of clear-thinking Men so that i remain invisible. and i prance around and it's amazing how people seem to sense something but studiously ignore it.

    and i have powers to identify neocon plots. and i can see that U2 and bono are shit, full of krap, and suck! as you see, i have a lot of powers. it's just that i can't find a good costume. capes are sooooo outre this season. and my codpiece chafes.

    🙂

    drf

  15. Dunlap Amy   21 years ago

    EMAIL: pamela_woodlake@yahoo.com
    IP: 62.213.67.122
    URL: http://web-hosting.1st-host.org
    DATE: 01/20/2004 08:25:43
    Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Lawmakers in Texas and Ohio Consider Abolishing Property Taxes

Christian Britschgi | From the February/March 2026 issue

The Supreme Court Is Poised To Remind States That the Constitution Doesn't Stop at the Liquor Store

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 2.7.2026 7:00 AM

Archives: February-March 2026

Reason Staff | From the February/March 2026 issue

Most Americans Hate Trump's Tariffs

Jack Nicastro | 2.6.2026 4:54 PM

The Trump Administration Is Taking Credit for a Long-Running Murder Decline

Alexandra Stinson | 2.6.2026 3:48 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks