If You're Tired of Speculations About Salam Pax, You Can Skip This Item

Jesse Walker | 5.31.2003 12:29 PM

Steve Rhodes offers still more reasons to doubt David Warren's claim that the Baghdad blogger is secretly a Ba'athist.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

NEXT: Has It Really Been a Year?

Hide Comments (1)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

Douglas Fletcher 22 years ago

He may not be a Ba'athist but if things in Baghdad are as bad as we hear, he does probably needs a bath.

I must say that if you're not interested in it, this whole Salam Pax thing is really uninteresting.

Time for another drink. Kinda hot here in the desert.

Please log in to post comments

If You're Tired of Speculations About Salam Pax, You Can Skip This Item

Latest

Defending Student Deportations, Marco Rubio Equates Writing an Anti-Israel Op-Ed With Starting a Riot

Peter Navarro Says Tariffs Will Be a $6 Trillion Tax Increase, but Also a Tax Cut

The Best Thing About the Proposed California Initiative Named After Luigi Mangione Is the Title

Who Is the 'Top Missile Guy' the U.S. Killed in Yemen?

Don't Count on Quitting Social Media To Make Your Life Better

Recommended

Login Form