Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Bennett's Betting

Reason Staff | 5.5.2003 7:41 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

"Working his way down the list of other people's pleasures, weaknesses, and uses of American freedom, he just happened to skip over his own. How convenient." -- Slate's Michael Kinsley on morals maven/hyper gambler Bill Bennett.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Welcome to The New Atlantis

Reason Staff
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. thoreau   23 years ago

    JDM-

    Bennett has every right to offer his opinion in public. He has every right to say to people "I think you would be better off if you lived accordign to these precepts." He has every right to say that gambling is OK as long as you don't let the habit get out of control.

    HOWEVER, Mr. Bennett is engaging in a habit that some people (for reasons good or bad, rational or irrational, fair or unfair) think is immoral. Now, when defending his habit, he offers the argument that it's fine to gamble as long as you don't do it to excess and don't hurt yourself or anybody else.

    I completely agree with Mr. Bennett's defense of gambling, and I hope for his sake that he continues to have fun without hurting himself. However, his defense of gambling could be just as easily applied to marijuana, adult pornography (NOT child porn), rap music, and other things that Bennett condemns and often says that the state should regulate.

    All I want from Mr. Bennett is a little explanation of why it's OK for consenting adults to gamble but not OK for consenting adults to smoke a joint.

  2. JDM   23 years ago

    fyodor,

    Fun is fun, and if that's all you're doing, have at it. Not everyone posting here is the same.

    thoreau,

    That's wll well and good. The posters I was referring too are not so well reasoned.

  3. Eric Hanneken   23 years ago

    JDM,

    Which posters were you referring to?

  4. Xrlq   23 years ago

    Jim:

    Show me some evidence the Bill Bennett has engaged in conduct that he considers immoral, and I'll concede that he's a hypocrite. Making an issue of the fact that he engages in conduct that others find objectionable is a non-starter. After all, if everyone who gambles but opposes drug legalization is a "hypocrite" (read: 90% of the people in any casino at any given time), then the word has lost all meaning.

  5. thoreau   23 years ago

    xlrg-

    The hypocrisy is not in his conduct. He thinks gambling is OK for anybody, not just himself, so he does it. More power to him. I'm sure the casino employees all thank him for it.

    The hypocrisy is in how he defends himself: He has no problem using the argument "If my habit is under control and I'm not hurting anybody else then it's nobody else's business." He never explains why that argument only applies to gambling and not to rap music, pornography (excluding child porn, obviously), and pot.

  6. PLC   23 years ago

    I'm not sure about rap music, but purchasing pornography pretty clearly hurts others. Demand for porn drives supply. Supply provides the weak and momentarily lost ample opportunity to utterly destroy their lives.

  7. David   23 years ago

    This story just completely baffles me...why is gambling considered so immoral? Mind you, I don't gamble at all; it seems pretty useless & boring to me. But it really seems that Bennett's hobby is not inconsistent with his quest for a more "virtuous" America.

  8. Eric Hanneken   23 years ago

    Of course, The Weekly Standard is rushing to defend Bennett, because, you know, "[h]e certainly hasn't made a career out of condemning gambling." And, "while [some of Bennett's critics are] castigating Bennett for gambling today [They are? I thought it was for hypocricy.], they were staunch defenders of sin-magnet Bill Clinton just a few years back." Well, I guess we all owe Bennett an apology.

  9. JDM   23 years ago

    As would the complete legalization of drugs....

  10. thoreau   23 years ago

    So what types of personal activity should the government be allowed to ban/regulate, and which types of behavior should be outside the scope of law?

    For the record, I am not suggesting that pornography and drug use are moral actions, but we all know how "well" government works...

  11. Drogney Tagblad   23 years ago

    I'm more afraid of a non-hypocrite; I believe the President and A.G. to be completely sincere men, and the public respond to that regardless of the value of what they're sincere _about_ (not quite Christian Reconstructionism, but sort of a secular version of it where both the very religious and the very wealthy are seen as basically "elect", the rest of us here and all foreigners as "preterite", and America as God's Champion in the world).

  12. Jack S.   23 years ago

    B.B. is an elite and considers himself above his own ramblings much like many of those who make laws and set moral high bars. Not leading by example but by the boot.

  13. Jim Nelson   23 years ago

    The reason Bill Bennett is a hypocrite is that he has made a career out of high-minded declarations of what is right and wrong, and how even victimless and consensual acts hurt society at large. He also made much hay out of our culture's love of instant gratification. In a casino, there is nothing more instantly gratifying than video poker and slots: no strategizing, no poker face, no numerical analysis.

    Gambling may not be unvirtuous, but $8 million wasted on one-arm bandits points to something akin to vice.

  14. Fred App   23 years ago

    I happen to agree with David -- I don't consider gambling to be immoral. But, then again, I've never held myself up to be The Authority on Morality. The fact is, the same excuses that Bennett uses to justify his gambling are the same ones he won't let others use to defned their so-called sins. Basically, Bennett is hypocritical because he picks and chooses what he considers moral: If it's my vice, it's OK; if it's someone else's, it's not.

    Reminds me of Mel Brook's definition of tragedy and comedy. Tragedy is when you fall on your ass; comedy is when someone else does.

  15. alkali   23 years ago

    "Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die."

  16. Sven   23 years ago

    I haven't had a good hit of schadenfreude like this since Jim Bakker. Ooooh yeah. Makes my spine tingle.

  17. joe   23 years ago

    A few months ago, it came out that Pat Robertson ownes race horses. Once again, nada from the right wing commentariat.

    The difference between Bennett's scandal and Clinton's? Those of us flailing away at Bennett don't want to bring him up on crimininal charges or remove anyone from public office.

  18. fyodor   23 years ago

    When deciding what number to play, does Bill use his Moral Compass??

  19. JDM   23 years ago

    The only hypocrits here are all the social libertarian types who rail against the Bill Bennett types for even claiming that there is such a thing as morality, then castigate him for his own moral failings. This is nothing but jingoistic piling on.

    I've seen Bennett on TV 2 or 3 times, and other than that, I don't know anything about him, but I would think that libertarians would agree that if he makes an argument, it should be evaluated on its merits, and wouldn't embarass themselves with
    this type of ad hominum nonsense.

    What you're actually doing is arguing Bennett's case by claiming his immorality disqualiies him from public discussion.

  20. fyodor   23 years ago

    JDM,

    Aw, c'mon, libertarians just like to have fun, too! And it's only human nature to have a little fun at the expense of those who have propped themselves up as moral guardians when they've shown themselves to have their own moral failings. And it happens every time!

    Jacob Sullum addresses the issue in a more properly libertarian manner two posts above this one, if that's more to your liking.

    But still, Bennett's example demonstrates why it's absurd to claim that morality is an absolute and that those who don't think so have lost their Moral Compass or Moral Clarity. Morality is obviously quite subjective. Just ask around and you'll find that everyone has their own view of it. How more subjective can that be?

    Bennett can gamble all he likes as far as I'm concerned. And he has the right to speak on issues all he likes. But the fact that he is very actively engaged in an activity proscribed by the traditional notions of morality that he claims has all the answers helps to bely the validity of his own argument. When it comes to moral posturing, ad hominen attacks aren't entirely out of line.

  21. Jim N   23 years ago

    PLC and JDM, couldn't the same argument be applied to gambling?

    "Supply provides the weak and momentarily lost ample opportunity to utterly destroy their lives."

  22. Croesus   23 years ago

    Jim N.,

    Which is of course why they have re-hab clinics for those addicted to gambling.

  23. JDM   23 years ago

    Jim N,

    Yes.

  24. カジノ   22 years ago

    Great site! Keep it running!

    ???

  25. Online Casinos information   22 years ago

    Hi, just popped in here through a random link. Cool site, keep this good work up 🙂

    Online Casinos information

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A First Amendment Lawsuit Challenges FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson's Vendetta Against NewsGuard

Jacob Sullum | 2.9.2026 4:00 PM

A 'Goldilocks' Effect for Online Teens? Moderate Social Media Users Fare Better Than Abstainers or Heavy Users

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 2.9.2026 11:44 AM

Claiming Bad Bunny Isn't Successful Is as Foolish As Claiming He Isn't American

Eric Boehm | 2.9.2026 10:52 AM

Half-Hearted Halftime Outrage

Christian Britschgi | 2.9.2026 9:42 AM

Alienated by Trump, Europeans Finally Take Responsibility for Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 2.9.2026 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks