Ratherism
Nick's post on the language of war reminded me of something I heard CBS' Dan Rather say fairly early on in the conflict. He mentioned that U.S. divisions would be bringing "weapons of quite considerable destruction" to the party.
Courage Dan, courage.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Reminds me of Kent Brockman's (Springfield's primary champion of "infotainment") comment to his audience: "Avoision--it's a word--look it up."
Matt B.,
Is that true? Is there a link or something to look at?
YA Steve,
Sorry, no link, only my recollection.
--Matt B.
What is the adjective, Kenneth?
On the first night of bombing, while watching live pictures from Baghdad, Dan could be heard saying, "the rockets red glare, the bombs bursting in air..."