Saddam, We Hardly Knew Ye
The Atlantic has an interview with Mark Bowden, author of that mag's May cover story on the Butcher of Baghdad (and of Black Hawk Down and Killing Pablo. Among the tidbits:
In modern times tyrants have tended to be motivated primarily by ideology. So you have Pol Pot and Mao and Stalin and Hitler and Castro, all of whom were driven by fantasies of creating a higher social order. And then you have tyrants like Mobutu Sese-Sekou and Idi Amin and Papa Doc Duvalier, who were primarily motivated by greed?who were just trying to amass as much power, and have sex with as many women, and eat as much food as they could. Saddam is different in that he appears to be motivated primarily by vanity. And by this romantic fascination with Arabian history?the glory of Arabia.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As an aside, I'd put Milosevic in the same category - motivation from a romantic vision of the past, and by the 'glories' of Serb history. He wanted a chance to finally win the battle of Kosovo...
Bowden's cover story is totally worth reading.
I'd say Stalin was pretty willing to move around ideologically to sustain his own power and add to his future glory.