Talk to the Hand
Barbie's waist is too small to support her torso. Is that why Mattel is so overprotective?
Most recently, the company appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its trademark complaint against MCA Records for the 1997 Aqua song "Barbie Girl." The justices have rejected the case.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I think Mattel is gunshy about a lawsuit because it got burned so badly fighting the "White Trash Barbie" parody a few years back (black roots, cutoff jeans, a cigarette, and baby on hip).
Mattel would have been better off suing on trademark infringement. Then I could have enjoyed Universal defending itself on those charges while at the same time using the courts to go after downloaders.
So maybe consumers did the right thing after all. "Gee, this song sounds like a trademark infringement, I'd better download it instead of buying it so no one gets hurt."