Not-So-Public Domain
The U.S. Supreme Court, as expected, ruled in favor of Big Entertainment in Eldred v. Ashcroft, the high-profile case about the legitimacy of the Sonny Bono Act of 1998, which extended copyrights by 20 years.
Reports the AP:
A contrary ruling would have cost entertainment giants like The Walt Disney Co. and AOL Time Warner Inc. hundreds of millions of dollars. AOL Time Warner had said that would threaten copyrights for such movies as "Casablanca," "The Wizard of Oz" and "Gone With the Wind."
This isn't quite accurate. Yes, had Eldred won, those giants would have lost some of their copyrights. But it's far from clear that they would have lost "hundreds of millions" of dollars. Check out this, this, and this.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I’m sure that Hollings, the Senator for Disney, will be pleased…
They are not just ruling for Big Entertainment. They are extending the monopoly on their own memoirs. Did we just read about Clarence Thomas’s book deal?