Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Cracklin' Oat Bran and the TSA

Tim Cavanaugh | 1.9.2003 9:14 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

What I'd like to know is whether using a cardboard Cracklin' Oat Bran box was part of this couple's political statement, or just an effort to reuse and recycle.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Check Cashing

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (7)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mark Draughn   24 years ago

    It sounds like somebody in security got pissed off at the message and decided to drum something up to cause trouble for the author.

    I'm the kind of person who keeps a copy of the "To Serve Man" cannibal cookbook in my desk drawer at work, just to upset somebody who's snooping where they shouldn't. I can understand leaving a message for people pawing through my luggage.

    Building a fake bomb, however, is not cool. Still, no one of those items is very suspicious by itself. I imagine the TSA will argue that the note makes the bomb-like arrangement of shapes more likely to have been intentional and therefore a crime. Then again maybe his bags get opened every time he has an electrical power strip in them and this pisses him off so he wrote a note.

    I suppose the truth depends on what "a snow boot with batteries, wires and an electrical power strip arranged in a suspicious way" turns out to be.

  2. Casey Tompkins   24 years ago

    Oh, no, Mark; you miss the true brilliance of the satire!

    Please note the last sentance of the article:
    "Don't force our screeners to waste their time playing political games."

    Lovely, truly lovely. No, let's force THE BLOODY GOVERNMENT TO DO IT FOR US.

    This is irony that only a Shakespeare could write upon his own. Truly life is stranger than fiction...

  3. JD Weiner   24 years ago

    Casey,

    My thought was that maybe Johnson of the TSA ("Don't force our screeners to waste their time") is secretly Applegate of the Port of Portland ("Thousands of people go through the same process every day and don't get upset enough to get arrested"). But then, all bureaucrats are basically the same under the skin.

    I'm always amused, too, at how official types claim you're "wasting their time" whenever you make them do anything they didn't want to do (like think, or expend energy). So the searchers would have gone home early if the couple hadn't brought their fake bomb? I doubt it. They would have searched other people, whom they had to let go because they were too busy with a ski boot? I doubt that even more; I'm sure everyone still got searched that day. They would have gotten other important work done? But standing there searching people is their job! Maybe other people's time was wasted as they were held up waiting while the searchers all fussed over the boot...but you notice that Johnson doesn't say that? No, he's concerned about wasting the feds' time, not the citizens'. Heck, if one were of a sufficiently flippant bent, one could say that not bringing a bomb into the airport was a waste of the searchers' time, because then they spent their time searching you for nothing...

  4. Steve   24 years ago

    While I agree with the protest, I don't agree with the methods. I don't see how intentionally placing items in a suspicious manner to simulate a bomb provides this couple with any credibility.

    I have had enough of "civil disobedience". It is nothing less than lawbreaking to make a point. We could have made our point in elections at any time we chose. We continue to put the same people in power and blame it on who the other guy voted for.

    Gimme a break. We get what we want AND deserve.

  5. Craig   24 years ago

    A question arises. Were the boots in question indeed, "arranged in a suspicious way", or rather were the boots wired for heat (nice toasty toes, never bought them myself)? As to the note, it goes into the column of "joking" and we all know that the screeners do not have a sense of humor.

  6. Casey Tompkins   24 years ago

    JD: good point. Maybe someone should bring one in, just to make their day. :))

    Steve: "I have had enough of 'civil disobedience'. It is nothing less than lawbreaking to make a point."

    Well, gee, Steve, that's the working definition of "civil disobedience". Durrr. Heh.

    Considering that we've only had ONE round of elections after 9/11, I find your remarks about "making your points during elections" disingenuous, at the least... 🙂

  7. Steve   24 years ago

    Casey:

    Point taken regarding CD.

    Regarding elections, we NEVER make our point during elections. We'd just as soon bitch about some other guys' pork while being happy about the jobs opur guy brought to our community.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

$40 Trillion and Parents' Night Out

Liz Wolfe | 8.20.2026 9:30 AM

Texas Requires the Ten Commandments Be Posted in Every Classroom. SCOTUS May Decide If That's Constitutional.

Damon Root | 8.20.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Fake Stop

Charles Oliver | 8.20.2026 4:00 AM

ICE Handed Over Specific Iranians at the Islamic Republic's Request

Matthew Petti | 8.19.2026 4:15 PM

Breakthrough Personalized mRNA Vaccines Are Highly Effective Against Melanoma Skin Cancers

Ronald Bailey | 8.19.2026 3:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason