Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Cracklin' Oat Bran and the TSA

Tim Cavanaugh | 1.9.2003 9:14 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

What I'd like to know is whether using a cardboard Cracklin' Oat Bran box was part of this couple's political statement, or just an effort to reuse and recycle.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Check Cashing

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (7)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mark Draughn   22 years ago

    It sounds like somebody in security got pissed off at the message and decided to drum something up to cause trouble for the author.

    I'm the kind of person who keeps a copy of the "To Serve Man" cannibal cookbook in my desk drawer at work, just to upset somebody who's snooping where they shouldn't. I can understand leaving a message for people pawing through my luggage.

    Building a fake bomb, however, is not cool. Still, no one of those items is very suspicious by itself. I imagine the TSA will argue that the note makes the bomb-like arrangement of shapes more likely to have been intentional and therefore a crime. Then again maybe his bags get opened every time he has an electrical power strip in them and this pisses him off so he wrote a note.

    I suppose the truth depends on what "a snow boot with batteries, wires and an electrical power strip arranged in a suspicious way" turns out to be.

  2. Casey Tompkins   22 years ago

    Oh, no, Mark; you miss the true brilliance of the satire!

    Please note the last sentance of the article:
    "Don't force our screeners to waste their time playing political games."

    Lovely, truly lovely. No, let's force THE BLOODY GOVERNMENT TO DO IT FOR US.

    This is irony that only a Shakespeare could write upon his own. Truly life is stranger than fiction...

  3. JD Weiner   22 years ago

    Casey,

    My thought was that maybe Johnson of the TSA ("Don't force our screeners to waste their time") is secretly Applegate of the Port of Portland ("Thousands of people go through the same process every day and don't get upset enough to get arrested"). But then, all bureaucrats are basically the same under the skin.

    I'm always amused, too, at how official types claim you're "wasting their time" whenever you make them do anything they didn't want to do (like think, or expend energy). So the searchers would have gone home early if the couple hadn't brought their fake bomb? I doubt it. They would have searched other people, whom they had to let go because they were too busy with a ski boot? I doubt that even more; I'm sure everyone still got searched that day. They would have gotten other important work done? But standing there searching people is their job! Maybe other people's time was wasted as they were held up waiting while the searchers all fussed over the boot...but you notice that Johnson doesn't say that? No, he's concerned about wasting the feds' time, not the citizens'. Heck, if one were of a sufficiently flippant bent, one could say that not bringing a bomb into the airport was a waste of the searchers' time, because then they spent their time searching you for nothing...

  4. Steve   22 years ago

    While I agree with the protest, I don't agree with the methods. I don't see how intentionally placing items in a suspicious manner to simulate a bomb provides this couple with any credibility.

    I have had enough of "civil disobedience". It is nothing less than lawbreaking to make a point. We could have made our point in elections at any time we chose. We continue to put the same people in power and blame it on who the other guy voted for.

    Gimme a break. We get what we want AND deserve.

  5. Craig   22 years ago

    A question arises. Were the boots in question indeed, "arranged in a suspicious way", or rather were the boots wired for heat (nice toasty toes, never bought them myself)? As to the note, it goes into the column of "joking" and we all know that the screeners do not have a sense of humor.

  6. Casey Tompkins   22 years ago

    JD: good point. Maybe someone should bring one in, just to make their day. :))

    Steve: "I have had enough of 'civil disobedience'. It is nothing less than lawbreaking to make a point."

    Well, gee, Steve, that's the working definition of "civil disobedience". Durrr. Heh.

    Considering that we've only had ONE round of elections after 9/11, I find your remarks about "making your points during elections" disingenuous, at the least... 🙂

  7. Steve   22 years ago

    Casey:

    Point taken regarding CD.

    Regarding elections, we NEVER make our point during elections. We'd just as soon bitch about some other guys' pork while being happy about the jobs opur guy brought to our community.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death

Jack Nicastro | 7.3.2025 3:38 PM

Federal Prison Guards Allegedly Beat an Inmate to a Pulp. The Supreme Court Says He Can't Sue.

Billy Binion | 7.3.2025 2:48 PM

Jurassic World Rebirth Chases Summer Movie Nostalgia

Peter Suderman | 7.3.2025 1:40 PM

The $4 Trillion 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Breaks the Bank and Violates Congress' Own Budget Rules

Veronique de Rugy | 7.3.2025 11:25 AM

Trump's New Trade Deal Has a Clear Winner: Vietnam

Eric Boehm | 7.3.2025 11:10 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!