The State of Hate
Does the First Amendment forbid states to punish bigots more severely than other criminals? The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to decide this summer. Last year the Wisconsin Supreme Court overturned that state's hate-crime law, which imposes extra punishment on offenders when they are motivated by prejudice. (See "What's Hate Got to Do with It?", December.) The state appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in the case, Wisconsin v. Mitchell in April. The Court's decision is likely to determine the constitutional status of similar laws in 28 other states, including Ohio, whose Supreme Court has also rejected penalty enhancement for hate crimes.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "The State of Hate."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?