Liberal Harvard Groupthink Criticized By... Michael Bloomberg?

Harvard UniversityWikimedia CommonsFormer New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is infamous for his liberty-unfriendly views on racial profiling, gun control and public health. But as the saying goes, even a broken, miserably authoritarian clock is right twice a day.

Bloomberg, who delivered the commencement address to Harvard University's graduating class yesterday, harshly criticized the climate of leftist indoctrination at Ivy League campuses.

"There was more disagreement among the old Soviet politburo than there is among Ivy League donors," he said, noting that 96 percent of Harvard faculty members and administrators donated to President Obama's re-election campaign.

Bloomberg warned that some campuses seem determined to root out all dissenting views.

"Today on many college campuses, it is liberals trying to oppress conservatives, even as conservative faculty members are in danger of becoming an endangered species," he said.

The dangers of groupthink at American universities have rarely been more apparent. Over the past few weeks, intolerant students and faculty at campus after campus have succeeded in their efforts to shut down events featuring non-liberal viewpoints. Speakers from all across the ideological spectrum suffered persecution, as long as they subscribed to at least one opinion deemed unacceptable by the forces of political correctness.

Predictably, some Harvard students opposed Bloomberg as a commencement speaker, given his support for heavy-handed police tactics and racial profiling.

"It's unsettling to me, [for] someone to speak who advocates a racist policy when you want students of color on campus to feel comfortable," said Harvard junior Keyanna Wigglesworth in a statement to CNN. "It's confusing and I don't think it's what Harvard stands for."

This view that the emotional comfort of students is more important than fostering a climate of open inquiry is disturbingly common and even increasing, according to a recent report by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. FIRE President Greg Lukianoff wrote:

"FIRE has informally tracked disinvitation incidents for a long time, but the attention paid to the problem this year because of the prominence of the speakers at issue led us to systematically evaluate the problem,” said FIRE President Greg Lukianoff. “The data confirms what we and many others suspected: The desire to silence speakers on campus is strong—and disturbingly, ‘disinvitations’ are becoming more common."

More on campus free speech battles here.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Auric Demonocles||

    Bloomberg, who delivered the commencement address to Harvard University's graduating class yesterday

    Seriously, who has graduation on a Thursday? My commute (through Harvard Square) sucked yesterday due to these liberal jerks.

  • WDATPDIM?!||

    Keyanna Wigglesworth

    WTF?

  • GILMORE||

    "It's unsettling to me, [for] someone to speak who advocates a racist policy when you want students of color on campus to feel comfortable"

    Because that's why we go to college = to be protected from ever having to listen to points of view that are different, or to ever not 'feel comfortable'.

    I'm not even sure what words like 'settled' or 'comfortable' mean in this context.

  • Paper Wasp||

    She says, after getting into Harvard by benefiting from racist policies.

  • Juice||

    He only spoke out against it because some college crown booed his old pal, the corrupt shitheel, Ray Kelly.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement