Eric Holder Calls for Crackdown on Drug Smuggling Through 'the Mails'

Terry Ross/WikimediaTerry Ross/Wikimedia

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) are warning that "the mails" are increasingly being used to ship illegal drugs. Murkowski told the Senate Appropriations Committee Thursday that this scourge was "wiping out whole families" in rural areas of Alaska and "we need to get on it yesterday." 

Holder called it "shocking to see the amount of drugs that get pumped into communities" through the U.S. Postal Service and "a major problem we have to deal with." The warning was part of his testimony regarding the Justice Department's Fiscal Year 2015 budget request. 

How big of a problem is USPS drug smuggling, really? The number of arrests related to narcotics shipments did jump 33 percent in 2012 from the previous year, according to U.S. Postal Inspection Service figures. Whether this is due to an uptick in drug-o-grams or increased law enforcement efforts is hard to say. 

But if we use the number of arrests as a proxy for the amount of drugs being shipped through the USPS, the practice has been pretty stable for the past two decades. An 1999 article from The Arizona Republic notes that "typically, the Postal Service...arrests 1,800 people nationwide for smuggling drugs and money through the mail each year." In 2001, there were only 1,662 such arrests. 

Between 1994 and 1996, 6,170 people—an average of 2,056 per year—were arrested for attempting to deliver or receive drugs through the mail, according to The Christian Science Monitor. In 2012, there were around 1,760 such arrests. 

According to a report in Louisiana newspaper The Advocate, most mailed drug cases involve very small amounts of drugs (and end up being prosecuted through local, not federal, laws). To catch these small-scale drug shiptments, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service already places "prohibited mail narcotics teams" around the country. Suspicious tape or odors may get package flagged, officials said—as might having a return address from "suspicious" location. 

From The Advocate:

Wagner, the local mail sleuth, was profiling parcels at the mail processing facility on Bluebonnet Boulevard in May when he singled out an express package sent from San Leandro, Calif., that he deemed suspicious because it originated in "a known source city for narcotics."

Shipping something from San Leandro, California? Apparently that's all the probable cause needed!

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat||

    Are you sure he didn't mean "the males", as in rectal transport?

    I wonder which end the mail arrests come from: the recipient or the sender. I believe that for packages, you have to either sign for it or open it to have custody. I'm not sure about mail, though.

  • Adam330||

    There is only one solution- shut down the postal service.

  • RishJoMo||

    Screw you Eric Holder, you worthless P O S.

  • croaker||

    The goal is to make snail mail as open to tracking/recording/storage as email. "Drugs" are just the excuse.

  • Number 2||

    So where are the "entire families" being destroyed ?

    I am increasingly convinced that all that will be needed to win the debate over drug prohibition is to let the drug prohibitionists do all the talking. The more they talk, the more preposterous they make themselves.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.