Sequestration Furloughs? More Like Sequestration Reduced Business Travel, GAO Reports

Remember those reports of suffering federal workers, starving in their cold, unheated apartments after being furloughed because cruel Republicans forced sequestration of funds on Uncle Sugar last year? OK, that's a bit over the top, but that's true, too, of a lot of reporting on sequestration and "government shutdowns." And so are federal agencies' media-ready "closed for business" signs on facilities that are actually self-supporting or privately run. As it turns out, according the Government Accountability Office (GAO), sequestration involved some annoying bookkeeping, and some workers were briefly sent home (many of those sent home for the government shutdown collected both back pay and jobless benefits), but forcing $80.5 billion in savings on federal agencies (the 2014 federal budget is $3.651 trillion, for comparison) wasn't exactly a catastrophe.

Of 23 federal agencies surveyed by the GAO:

19 agencies reported curtailing hiring; 16 reported rescoping or delaying contracts or grants for core mission activities; 19 reported reducing employee training; 20 reported reducing employee travel; and 7 reported furloughing more than 770,000 employees from 1 to 7 days.

Overall, as the report title captures it, "agencies reduced some services and investments, while taking certain actions to mitigate effects." When you're talking about business travel, grants, and new hiring, it's hard to argue that doom is in the works, when you think about it.


There was also a fair amount of accounting sleight of hand:

To implement sequestration, most agencies reported using funding flexibilities to balance mission protection and required sequestration reductions. These flexibilities included reprogramming funds within an account, transferring funds between accounts, and using unobligated balances from prior years.

Of the 770,000 furloughed workers, about 640,500 were civilian employees of the Department of Defense. Back pay for the sequester, separate from already approved back pay for the government shutdown, is pending.

One other result of sequestration? The Department of Justice filed 1,600 fewer civil and criminal cases. Given how that department has thrown its weight around over the years, that actually may be a net benefit.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • DJF||

    But, but, but they closed the Mall in Washington!!!!. Unless of course you were illegal aliens protesting for amnesty.

  • DJF||

    They would have closed the Washington Monument but unfortunately it was already closed for repairs.

  • Rich||

    A *real* sequester would have allowed people into the Monument during the time construction was halted.

  • DJF||

    Right, no money for guards

    The White House access would have been like when it was first built, the public just wandering in and out as the pleased.

  • Doctor Whom||

    The federal government was so broke that it had to send people around to put up "Closed" signs on usually unstaffed pull-off areas on the George Washington Memorial Parkway. Are you heartless loonytarians fine with that?

  • AlmightyJB||

    and all of the lobbiest went home because the government was out of money and they all livex happily ever after. The end.

  • Bo Cara Esq.||

    "One other result of sequestration? The Department of Justice filed 1,600 fewer civil and criminal cases. Given how that department has thrown its weight around over the years, that actually may be a net benefit."

    Oh, they have found a way to make that work against citizens, some of the biggest cuts have been for federal public defenders.

  • SIV||


  • Bo Cara Esq.||

    Aw, is his feelings hurt or something?

  • Swiss Servator, alles klar?||

    Why just Thursday?

  • CE||

    We can't seem to escape this TrollFreeThursday troll. He's commenting on every article, like the women who make 85,000 a month in a few hours on their computers.

  • CE||

    Everyone deemed inessential should have been permanently furloughed. Then federal agencies should have been ordered to cut 20% of the remaining employees too.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.