Police Militarization is Not Inevitable: 58 Percent Think It’s Already Going Too Far

they've gone to disneylandTwitterAmericans, it seems, have had enough police militarization, with the latest Reason-Rupe poll finding a full 58 percent of respondents believing that the use of drones, military weapons, and armored vehicles by local police departments as already going “too far.” That includes a full 60 percent of both Democrats and Tea Partiers. Opposition is under 50 percent among non-Tea Party Republicans.

Policing in the United States has seen rapid militarization, fueled by the war-like mentality that comes with the “drug war,” as well as by the abundance of military surplus available to local police departments from the federal government, especially since 9/11. The military gear ends up at agencies across the country, from New York to Wyoming. Earlier this year, the Defense Department even sent “free” (original cost to taxpayers: $658,000 each) mine-resistant ambush protected (MRAP) vehicles to 500 local police departments; vehicles the Pentagon didn’t think the military needed are now being used by local police forces. Disturbingly, an ACLU FOIA request revealed one police department, that of Concord, New Hampshire, cited the presence of Free State Project and Occupy New Hampshire activists as domestic terror threats for which the military vehicles were necessary. Concord had spent some time trying to get the feds to cover the cost of a military vehicle, and ended up getting at least the one for “free.”

The Super Bowl has become one annual display of such a post-9/11 dedication to security theater. Next month’s Super Bowl, to be held in New Jersey, has the NYPD promising “unprecedented” security for the event. Police militarization is difficult to ignore. Evidence of the policy greets Americans at nearly every transit center in the country, and at countless other points of interest.  It’s inherent danger is displayed every time a story about police abuse pops up; not many may make it into the national news cycle, but there’s a constant stream of such stories in the local news. Former Reason editor Radley Balko’s new book, Rise of the Warrior Cop, chronicles the history of police militarization in America, helping make the policy part of the national debate and not an inevitability to be resigned to.

The opposition to police militarization even (or especially) extends to the use of drones by cops, the least readily identifiable of domestic law enforcement’s military toolbox. Earlier this year, the FBI acknowledged using drones for domestic surveillance in “a very minimal way,” but it’s impossible to point to a drone the way you can point to an automatic weapon, a military vehicle, or full body armor. Nevertheless, wherever a local cop or politician has suggested the acquisition or deployment of drones, there’s been a backlash from concerned residents.

Related: Watch Reason TV’s “Cops With Machine Guns: The Killing of Michael Nida,” a piece from 2011, below

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • sarcasmic||

    not many may make it into the national news cycle, but there’s a constant stream of such stories in the local news

    Yet every single act of "gun violence" makes national headlines in effort to enact more laws restricting the public's access to weapons for self defense. Hmmmmmm....

  • Mainer2||

    It will never happen, of course, but imagine if police abuse was a regular segment each night on the evening news. Diane Sawyer could get all fake concerned as she introduces tonight's example of police abusing or even killing private citizens. Just a dream.

  • CE||

    or their pets. that would go over well with soccer moms.

  • Heroic Mulatto||

    Awww...how cute of you to think this issue could be resolved without spilling the blood of tyrants!

  • AlmightyJB||

    Exactly. This is not unplanned. And the power structure will not abandon that plan voluntarily. This is "for their protection" after all.

  • The Late P Brooks||

    Next month’s Super Bowl, to be held in New Jersey, has the NYPD promising “unprecedented” security for the event.

    WTF?

  • WTF||

    Because it is assumed a lot of the visitors will be spending time in Manhattan, and the Super Bowl publicity would theoretically make a terrorist strike at that time appealing.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Unless the citizens are also militarized, there is not stopping it.

  • WTF||

    Tis why only the cops should have guns, and the Second Amendment doesn't allow anything but basic firearms to be possessed by citizens.

  • Paul.||

    Muskets!

    /Bill Maher

  • Loki||

    Police Militarization is Not Inevitable: 58 Percent Think It’s Already Going Too Far

    Like the rulers care what us peasants think.

    The Super Bowl has become one annual display of such a post-9/11 dedication to security theater. Next month’s Super Bowl, to be held in New Jersey, has the NYPD promising “unprecedented” security for the event.

    Anybody else suspect this is just a big show of force similar to what's done in other authoritarian regimes? "The little people are getting uppity, better remind them who's boss."

  • ||

    “a very minimal way”

    Just the tip!

  • sarcasmic||

    Next month’s Super Bowl, to be held in New Jersey, has the NYPD promising “unprecedented” security for the event.

    How many people do you think the cops are going to kill?

  • WTF||

    I don't know, but between the cops and the traffic, which already sucks around here, I'm not leaving my house that weekend.

  • The Late P Brooks||

    Will we be permitted to see the ceremony in which Generalissimo Bloomberg, in full Austrian Cavalry regalia, including a solid gold jewel encrusted helmet with a plume of ermine tails, hands over control of the Grand Army of the Hudson to de Blasio?

  • Mainer2||

    There was lot's of uproar and criticism of Concord officials, but in the end, they got their BearCat...and that's all that really matters.

  • toasted||

    I don't think they care what Americans think. People outside this country put up a bigger fight.

  • CE||

    How about a female Indian diplomat getting locked up and strip-searched for not paying minimum wage?

    http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/17/.....-diplomat/

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement