President Obama Visits Israel, Says Alliance is Eternal

things change things stay the sameWhite HouseBarack Obama is on his first visit to Israel as president, after insisting in his first term he’d only visit if he had something concrete to accomplish. Both he and the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, are recently re-elected, and both would have likely preferred to be meeting with the other’s opponent. Nevertheless, the president said he was there “to reaffirm the unbreakable bond between our nations, to restate America's unwavering commitment to Israel's security”, but, also!, “to speak directly to the people of Israel” (to go “over the heads” of its leaders, as some put it)

America’s alliance with Israel is eternal—lanetzach—the president said, and Israel branded the visit “Operation Unbreakable Alliance,” with the country in a high state of alert for the 48 hours Obama will be there. After Tel Aviv, the president will be in Jerusalem, which the Washington Free Beacon notes the White House did not identify as part of Israel on the itinerary. The Free Beacon also found discrepancies in the map of Israel used in a White House video (Jerusalem, northern Israel, and areas around the West Bank were not identified as Israeli territory).

Meanwhile, in Jersualem itself Deutsche Welle finds neither Israelis or Palestinians optimistic about what President Obama’s visit might accomplish. In 1898, the German broadcaster notes, the sultan of the Ottoman Empire prepared six months for the Kaiser’s visit to Jerusalem. Palestinians have set up a protest camp in a region zoned by Israel for settlement (E1) for President Obama’s visit. Obama began his first term pushing for a settlement freeze but has since settled for not saying anything about it. Arab hopes for Obama have steadily declined, reports the Guardian, since his 2009 Cairo speech. America, in fact, is less popular now in parts of the Muslim world than it was when George W. Bush was president.

Another big issue on the itinerary is Iran, which President Obama last week told Israeli news was only a year or so away from having a nuclear bomb. Estimates for when Iran would get a nuclear weapon have ranged from 2000 to 2015. On the eve of his trip to Israel, meanwhile, Obama released a video address to the Iranian people on the occasion of the Iranian new year, warning them the country faced increased isolation if its leaders continued to pursue a nuclear policy.

Obama’s arrival in Israel comes on the tenth anniversary of the war in Iraq, a war Netanyahu supported (and Obama wanted to prolong) that arguably strengthened Iran’s influence in the region. This time, in addition to the looming prospect of war with Iran is a two-year-long civil war in Syria. Israel fears spill-over from that conflict, and will reportedly ask the president for U.S. support for any potential strikes on Syrian weapons convoys headed for Hezbollah in Lebanon. And while Israeli officials have said it was “apparently clear” Syria has used chemical weapons against its people, the White House says there’s no evidence of that.

Obama looks likely to continue the tradition of American presidents visiting Israel in their second term, endorsing the U.S.-Israeli alliance, and then not accomplishing much else.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Counterfly||

    Say his name, like sunshine in the rain..

  • LTC(ret) John||

    "America, in fact, is less popular now in parts of the Muslim world than it was when George W. Bush was president."

    Something, something, better to be feared than loved, something, something.

  • wareagle||

    America is certainly not feared in most of the Muslim world under Obama, at least not in the places drones tend to avoid.

  • Lord Peter Wimsey||

    Hey, Ed. That's a pretty damn good article on Israel. Reason should have you write ALL the articles on Israel. This one actually managed avoid reflexive anti-Israel undertones while maintaining a reasonable libertarian outlook.

    Of course, you may soon be poisoned and replaced by someone who thinks Noam Chomsky (the "libertarian") has some fascinating ideas on the subject. So watch your back.

  • sarcasmic||

    Q: How can you tell if Obama is lying?

    A: His lips are moving.

  • LTC(ret) John||

    "that arguably strengthened Iran’s influence in the region."

    Strange, I sure remember a lot of killed and captured IRGC around Basrah. And it was the IA that got 'em.

    I wonder about the "influence" Iran has on the Gulf States ... unless you mean "influencing them to arm, squash their Shi'a minorities and behave in a manner antithetical to stated Iranian goals?"

  • R C Dean||

    Iran is on the cusp of a major setback, depending on what happens in Syria (and, by extension, Lebanon).

    Whether they can expand their sphere of influence into Iraq, of course, is the next question.

    And how aggressive/successful they will be once they are snug under their own nuclear umbrella is probably the other major variable.

  • DJF||

    I like older American traditions, like the one about no entangling alliances with foreign countries.

  • Question of Auban||

    + googolplex

  • Question of Auban||

    As was pointed out in another thread we have heard this "year away from a nuclear bomb" story before.

    http://reason.com/blog/2013/03.....ch#comment

  • The Late P Brooks||

    "I like bagels. You guys are alright."

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement