Eminent Domain Abuse in Fort Collins, Colorado

Fort Collins, Colorado officials are threatening to use eminent domain to help a private developer acquire a Sears department store in the aging Foothills Mall. Sears owns its building and has rejected a purchase offer from developers Alberta Development Partners and Walton Street Capital, who bought the mall in July.

Via the Coloradoan:

City Manager Darin Atteberry ... [says] ... the city is “doing everything it can to minimize the possibility” of having to use eminent domain but said the probability that it will be necessary is relatively high. “We knew going in that (eminent domain) was something we might have to consider and it looks (like) the probability is high that we will have to consider it, but we also have a lot of work to do before we get to that point.”

The city is, in fact, already using eminent domain. Officials decided the mall is “a menace to the public health, safety, and welfare of the community” and approved an urban renewal plan for the area in 2007. Whether the city eventually files for condemnation or not, negotiations between Sears and the developers are clearly influenced by the fact that the city can seize the property.

Just how menacing is the mall? The blight study cites “elevation changes” that could lead to “hazardous slip and fall situations,” inadequate sidewalks, drainage problems, poor lighting and loading zones that extend into sidewalks and roadways. Click here for shocking picures of UPS trucks parked on curbs, empty parking lots, and other menacing menaces.

Despite the great threat Foothills has posed to the citizenry over the last 37 years, the study provides precisely zero examples of anyone getting hurt ever.

In addition to using eminent domain, the city is offering tax-increment financing to redevelop the mall, which is bringing in half the $4 million in sales tax revenue it has produced in years past. Now half empty, the mall's decline can be traced, at least in part, to competition from newer shopping centers in Fort Collins and nearby Loveland, both of which received public subsidies as well.

In 2006, the Colorado legislature passed weak eminent domain reform barring private-to-private transfers purely for economic development. However, municipalities can still seize “blighted” property for private use—and Colorado’s blight statutes are so vague they could apply to virtually any neighborhood.

Click here and here for more Reason coverage of recent Colorado eminent domain abuses.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Paul.||

    "elevation changes"

    I'm looking at a map of CO, and it appears that Ft. Collins is located in that decidedly Great Plains section of Colorado. You know, that part that actually is flatter than a pancake.

  • sarcasmic||

    In between the flat plains and the rising mountains is an area called the foothills that is, well, hilly.

    That's where Fort Collins, Boulder, Colorado Springs, and whatever other cities I can't remember off the top of my head are located.

    Denver is on the plains.

  • Paul.||

    I can definitely say that Denver is one of the flattest places I've ever been.

  • Agammamon||

    I wonder if by "elevation changes" they mean that the sidewalk is cracked and you could trip on it.

    If it was dark.

    And you were really drunk.

  • John||

    http://connecticut.cbslocal.co.....dra-fluke/

    I read somewhere that no one had bid on this, not surprising. Come DC reason items, lets pool together and bid. Lets fly sugar free and warty in for entertainment value what an ambush that would be.

  • Brandybuck||

    Why would anyone bid on that? Her only claim to fame is going through condoms so fast that her allowance from her one-percenter parents won't cover it.

  • John||

    For the same reason they watch reality shows about midgets and fat people; the oddly compelling nature of staring at a train wreck.

  • Agammamon||

    I wonder id Steve Smith would be up for a trip to the big city.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    ...negotiations between Sears and the developers are clearly influenced by the fact that the city can seize the property.

    I think it's nice of the city to go through the motions of negotiating at all. It's clear they don't have to.

  • fried wylie||

    and Colorado’s blight statutes are so vague they could apply to virtually any neighborhood.

    That settles it, I'm moving to Colorado. Now I just need to pick what property I want to have condemned and transferred to my ownership.

  • waaminn||

    Thats downright crazy when you think about it man!

    www.Anon-Goes.tk

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement