Baylen Linnekin on Challenging the Conventional Wisdom About Organic Food

Many of us have been told for years that organic food was healthier (for people, streams, bees, cows, Gaia, etc.) than conventional alternatives. But others have disagreed. “Organic foods may cost nearly twice as much as ordinary foods without offering consumers extra nutritional values,” reported a USDA official in 1974. The debate raged.

But this week a report issued by Stanford University researchers attempted to answer the question once and for all. The study, a meta analysis of more than 200 studies over the past decade looking at the nutrient and pathogenic content of organic food and conventional food, concludes that organic food is a big fat waste of money. Are the researchers correct? Baylen Linnekin investigates.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement