Union-Busting Scott Walker is Not a Job Killer After All

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is taking no chances in the union-instigated recall election he is facing in early June. He won more votes than all of the other Democratic candidates combined in the primary last week, prompting Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Craig Gilbert to remark:

It’s just not normal in politics for a major incumbent with token opposition to generate turnout on a par with a heavily contested race in the other party. It was an unexpected turnout bomb, a demonstration of Walker’s greatest political asset, even greater than his considerable money advantage -- the ability to mobilize his base.

And after being in a statistical dead-heat for a while with Tom Barrett, his Democratic challenger, he has now opened a six-point lead. Still, one of the raps against Walker is that his attacks on public sector union collective bargaining rights had yielded no economic benefits for the state.

Walker had been arguing that controlling government spending by making it difficult for public unions to negotiate lavish wages and benefits would allow the state to control taxes and attract business. Wisconsin’s business taxes are among the worst in the country. And according to the Tax Foundation, in 2009 Wisconsin had the fourth-highest combined state and local tax burden in the country, with only New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut residents paying more, as Nick Gillespie pointed out.

But months after the union reforms, Wisconsin’s job situation had deteriorated. Walker had promised to create 250,000 during his campaign. Instead he lost 33,900 jobs in his first full year from December 2010 to December 2011 – many of them, incidentally, in the private sector. At least that’s what his opponents claimed.

But they turned out to be quite wrong.

Their job loss figures, it seems, were estimated from a sample of 3.5 percent of Wisconsin’s businesses. However, new numbers released by the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages which are based on an actual count of all state businesses found that far from losing jobs, Wisconsin gained 23,321 jobs. This is not great. But it is heck of a lot better than losing jobs. And it'll make Wisconsin’s unemployment rate – already about a point and a half less than the national average – even better.

It is unusual for a state to release these figures before they are vetted and blessed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Hence, Walker’s opponents, who have been accusing him of killing jobs, are now accusing him of – gasp! – playing politics. But just how foul is Walker’s move? This is what the Bureau told the Milwaukee Sentinel Journal via email: “No, BLS does not have any concerns. Wisconsin is free to publish its data as it wishes.”

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • RFID||

    Wisconsin’s business taxes, are among the worst in the country.

    Dat comma splice.

  • ||

    Not quite. joe's Law has a long reach.

    A comma splice is the joining of two independent clauses with a comma, you generally should be using a colon, semicolon, or period instead.

  • Geoff Nathan||

    Actually it was just a mistake (you don't put any punctuation between a subject and a predicate) but I see it's already been fixed.

  • ClemonsLucinda||

    as Christopher responded I'm in shock that someone able to make $5945 in one month on the internet. have you seen this website..GoogleJob7.NOTlonG.CoM

  • Sevo||

    No, I haven't.

  • Jerry||

    Don't you need a comma there before instead?

  • ||

    I don't think so. I think it would be superfluous.

  • AlmightyJB||

  • Sevo||

    Latest "It's Bush's Fault":
    (if the squirrels approve)
    "Romney Attacks Obama for Not Cutting Debt Bush Amassed"
    Sounds (at least sort of) hypocritical on Mitten's part, no?
    Well, Mittens actual comments clear up the matter:
    "He (Obama) said that doing that (Bush running up the debt) was unpatriotic -- irresponsible and unpatriotic -- and he said he would cut the debt in half if he became president. Instead he doubled it."
    Hmmm. Wonder if the headline writer has a bias...
    The commenters obviously miss the point.
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.....159D32.DTL

  • Sevo||

    And latest award in Broken Window Prosperity:
    "Japan's economy grows 4.1 pct amid recovery"
    Measured by GDP, which includes government spending on all that new glass.
    Plus, let's add a bit of cherry picking. This is measured against:
    "across the country many Japanese were in mourning and stayed away from stores, theaters and pubs after the disaster, hurting an already hobbled economy."
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.....159D32.DTL

  • Mike M.||

    Considering that Wisconsin was the birthplace of the communist movement in America, it sure would be ironic indeed if it was also the place where it first died. Wouldn't that be something though?

  • Phil_EngAmer||

    Yeah, when it comes to job numbers in the state, you have to remember that both sides will have their own version of the story, and it’s hard to really get a totally accurate read of the situation (http://bit.ly/Kotz8q). In the lead up to this election we’ve seen a lot of political gamesmanship at play, in an effort to make numbers appear a certain way. Consider the public sector, we’ve heard a lot about job loss, but a large portion of that is coming from areas where Walker’s legislation is not in place, and unions would prefer it that way so they could make Walker look worse (http://bit.ly/yPR9db).

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Progressive Puritans: From e-cigs to sex classifieds, the once transgressive left wants to criminalize fun.
  • Port Authoritarians: Chris Christie’s Bridgegate scandal
  • The Menace of Secret Government: Obama’s proposed intelligence reforms don’t safeguard civil liberties

SUBSCRIBE

advertisement