Reason.com
ObamaCare's Exchanges: The Administration Makes the Rules, States Take the Blame
The Hill reports that state officials are worried that they might be blamed for problems inside ObamaCare's state-run, federally regulated health insurance exchanges:
Federal regulators are writing the rules governing key aspects of the law, including the guidelines to determine who's eligible for subsidies to buy private insurance.
Those benefits will be delivered through state-based exchanges, however, leaving state officials on the receiving end of angry phone calls if glitches in the law aren't ironed out by 2014.
ObamaCare's health insurance exchanges are set up so that the administration gets to make the rules, but states get to take the blame. This is one of the reasons why I've argued that states, especially those opposing the law in court, ought to think seriously about declining to participate in the exchanges entirely.
What sort of problems are states anticipating? Here's The Hill, again:
One key shortcoming is found in the law's subsidies for people who don’t have access to affordable coverage through their employer. As The Hill first reported in July, the law links the subsidies to the cost of coverage for a single employee. If that coverage is found to be affordable, the individual does not qualify for subsidies in the state health exchanges.
But the determination is based on the single-employee rate regardless of whether the individual has a spouse and/or children — meaning that someone could end up disqualified from the federal assistance yet unable to afford the family coverage that an employer offers.
"Such an outcome would undermine Maryland's goal of reducing the number of uninsured residents," Maryland Health Benefit Exchange officials wrote in comments to the Department of Health and Human Services that were due Monday.
Changing that calculation, however, could add as much as $500 billion to ObamaCare's price tag.
Most Popular Stories
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- When Government Privileges Trump the Rights of Citizens (5.25)
- Is the Ron Paul the Best Hope for Progressives? (5.25)
- Rand Paul Amendment to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Raiding Farms Fails, 78-15 (5.24)
- Friday Funnies (5.25)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
John Tagliaferro|11.8.11 @ 10:42AM|#
Those pesky local governments getting in the way of Obama's grand plan.
With executive orders he is attempting to bypass Congress without even the courtesy of the equivalent "Enabling Act", now he is trying to pull a "Reconstruction of the State" without bothering with a law there either.
Der Fuhrer had more respect for German law than this clown.
Rich|11.8.11 @ 11:24AM|#
I urge anyone who has not at least skimmed through the actual text of ObamaCare to do so.
John Tagliaferro|11.8.11 @ 11:25AM|#
That is a lot of skimming.
Rich|11.8.11 @ 11:34AM|#
Yep. No wonder no congresscreatures read it.
|11.8.11 @ 1:48PM|#
They did say it would have to pass before they knew what was in it. That's because no one would bother to read that monstrosity UNLESS it passed.
Federal Dog|11.8.11 @ 5:03PM|#
These people have no idea what is coming.
People are shit stupid to have ignored Massachusetts history.
|11.8.11 @ 10:55PM|#
Obamacare equal everything Dems supposedly hate: Bait and switch, hidden costs, gimmicks, misleading terms.
Nike Dunk High|12.9.11 @ 4:59AM|#
thanks