Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Seth Joppe

Donate

Policy

Indiana Bans Texting While Driving. But Web Surfing While Driving Is Still OK!

Peter Suderman | 7.1.2011 5:49 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The state of Indiana has officially banned texting while driving. Starting today, it is illegal to use any "telecommunications device to type, transmit or read a text message or an electronic mail message" at the same time you are driving. Individuals caught violating the texting ban face a possible $500 fine.

But don't worry. It's still legal to post comments to Hit & Run from behind the wheel. The Indy Star reports:

Activities such as searching the Internet, playing games and making a playlist on your iPod all remain legal for drivers, who are prohibited only from texting and emailing. The law was watered down after Indiana lawmakers balked at a comprehensive ban on using handheld devices behind the wheel.

"We were just not able to get that done in the legislative session," said Sen. Travis Holdman, R-Markle, who had supported a full ban but agreed to sponsor the existing law. "This is the best that we could do," he conceded during a news conference Thursday to outline the new law.

Is there a point to passing a law that bans texting but not, say, a Facebook message or a blog post? If anything, it seems likely that banning just one form of mobile communications is likely to drive more people to attempt even more awkward, and possibly more dangerous, work-arounds. 

According to The Star's report, the Republican lawmaker behind the texting-only statute gave two reasons for focusing only on texting. First, he wanted to increase the chances that the law would pass constitutional muster. "The other challenge," he said, "is the swift evolution of technology." There's a simpler way to avoid constitutional challenges and avoid being overtaken by new technology: Don't regulate texting while driving at all! 

But what about the safety implications? Won't a texting ban make the state's roads safer? Dangerous driving is what's on the mind of one Indiana police chief: 

Bluffton Police Chief Tammy Schaffer said she routinely sees drivers sending text messages.

"We're not going to catch everybody that's texting," she said. "But maybe if we can catch a few we can make our roads a little bit safer."

Maybe. But there's empirical evidence to suggest otherwise. According to a study conducted by the Highway Loss Data Institute last year, texting bans haven't resulted in decreased vehicle crashes. And in three of the four states that HLDI studied, crash rates increased following the passage of texting bans. The working theory as to why is that once texting bans kick in, drivers simply hold their phones lower in order to avoid being seen by police, and thus avert their eyes from the road for longer periods of time. So Chief Schaffer may indeed see fewer people texting on the road thanks to the new law. But that doesn't mean they won't be doing it, or that her state's roads will be any safer. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Study: Menu Labeling Doesn't Impact Food Choices

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

PolicyNanny StateTelecommunications PolicyAutomobilesTexting Bans
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (35)

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 909 donors, we've reached $566,245 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

Donald Trump Says He'll 'Be Involved' in Choosing Who Gets To Merge With Warner Bros.

Jack Nicastro | 12.8.2025 4:14 PM

The Government Wants To Punish Orgasmic Meditation Defendants for Crimes They Weren't Charged With

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.8.2025 12:11 PM

Hegseth Mulls Releasing a Video That Illustrates the Brutality of Trump's Murderous Anti-Drug Strategy

Jacob Sullum | 12.8.2025 10:00 AM

Final 40 Hours of Reason's Annual Fundraising Webathon Gets One Last $25,000 Matching Grant!

Matt Welch | 12.8.2025 9:45 AM

Boat Strike Inquiry

Liz Wolfe | 12.8.2025 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks