"Eminent Domain as Central Planning"
Writing in City Journal, Nicole Gelinas argues that New York's recent high-profile use of eminent domain on behalf of Columbia University and the Atlantic Yards stadium project in Brooklyn represent "government officials' belief that central planning is superior to free-market competition." A snippet:
To cure yourself of the notion that the government can do better than free markets in producing economic vitality, stroll around Atlantic Yards. You'll walk past three-story clapboard homes nestled next to elegantly corniced row houses—the supposedly blighted residences that the state plans to demolish. You'll see the Spalding Building, a stately sporting-goods-factory-turned-condo-building that, thanks to [Bruce] Ratner and his government allies, has been slated for demolition and now stands empty. You'll peer up at [Daniel] Goldstein's nearly empty apartment house, scheduled to be condemned and destroyed.
And you'll see how wrecking balls have already made the neighborhood gap-toothed. A vacant lot, for example, now sprawls where the historic Ward Bakery warehouse was, until recently, a candidate for private-sector reinvestment. Today, Prospect Heights finally shows what the state and city governments want everyone to see: decay. The decay, though, isn't the work of callous markets that left the neighborhood to perish. It's the work of a developer wielding state power to press property owners to sell their land "voluntarily." It's also the result of a half-decade's worth of government-created uncertainty, which stopped genuine private investment in its tracks.
For more on the Atlantic Yards boondoggle, see Reason's coverage here. For the Columbia University case, see here.
Show Comments (114)