A federal advisory panel recommended last
week that women between the ages of 40 and 49 no longer receive
routine mammograms to screen for breast cancer. American women
angrily rejected the panel's conclusion and a rattled Secretary
of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius quickly disavowed
the recommendation. Reason Science Correspondent Ronald
Bailey argues that the mammography controversy should encourage
the public do some cost-benefit analysis of its own about
increased government interference with health care.
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245