Tim Cavanaugh | July 11, 2009
Go ahead and get a few yucks from this TV news story about a teacher at a highly rated Sacramento school who "accidentally" (is there a psychiatrist in the house?) sent out a DVD to her students that contained what looks like nude autostimulation footage starring the teacher herself. Yes, of course it's every schoolboy's dream come true, but the scandalized reaction of parents is perfectly understandable. My kid's excellent teacher got laid off this year because she doesn't have enough time in the union, so I'm not shedding any tears for this person. Whatever the school decides to do with her is fine by me.
Still, I have to point out what a big weenie outraged
dad "Joe" is for: acting out Mrs. DelFonte's
(sp?) Mrs. Defanti's sex act on camera; dragging up that
ancient gag where the wide-eyed kid asks the
speechless parent a tough question; demanding the school make him
whole; expounding on how shocking it all is; and yet keeping his
mushmouthed noggin artfully out of frame while he's telling his
story. If you want to join in shaming a woman of easy virtue, at
least show your face, man.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I had a teacher in high school who was pretty hot and who
everyone would have loved to be statutory raped by. There were lots
of rumors about her banging students. Turned out she was
banging...the married vice principal. We were all very
disappointed.
If you want to join in shaming a woman of easy virtue, at least
show your face, man.
He didn't want you to see the leering mask of smug pseudo-morality
that he couldn't wipe off his face.
Still, I have to point out what a big weenie outraged dad
"Joe" is
The proper dad response is to confiscate the DVD and study it
carefully for educational content.
'Whatever the school decides to do with her is fine by
me.'
According to the article:
'CBS 13 reports that the local school district is investigating the
case, but that it is unlikely that teacher, who is well-liked and
respected, will lose her job.'
Of course, since it's CBS reporting it, it might not be 100%
true.
I'm very disappointed at the article's lack of thoroughness. It assumes that we'll just take their journalistic analysis of the contents of the DVD. I demand to decide for myself!
I have trouble taking "Joe" seriously since "Joe" can't even tie his shoes.
At least 'outraged dad "Joe"' hasn't (yet) made a federal case
of the school material to which his elementary-school child was
exposed, unlike another outraged dad with a daughter in the same
school system.
The DVD teacher's school is in the Elk Grove School District, where
the
famous Newdow case about the use of the phrase 'under God' in the
Pledge of Allegiance originated.
Recall that, in the Newdow case, the Ninth Circuit federal appeals
court declared that the use of 'Under God' was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court dismissed the case on jurisdictional
grounds.
In striking down the use of 'Under God,' the Ninth
Circuit said: 'The coercive effect of this policy is
particularly pronounced in the school setting given the age and
impressionability of schoolchildren, and their understanding that
they are required to adhere to the norms set by their school, their
teacher and their fellow students.'
As discussed in the Ninth Circuit opinion, 'Newdow does not allege
that his daughter's teacher or school district requires his
daughter to participate in reciting the Pledge. Rather, he claims
that his daughter is injured when she is compelled to "watch and
listen as her state employed teacher in her state-run school leads
her classmates in a ritual proclaiming that there is a God, and
that our's [sic] is `one nation under God."'
I wonder: what would the constitutional implications be for
exposing elementary-school children in the Elk Grove district to
this teacher's DVD? I suppose that the Ninth Circuit would insist
on editing out the word 'God,' if the teacher ever utters it during
her throes of ecstasy.
After all, the teacher is 'state employed,' and we know that even observing objectionable content has a coercive effect on young, impressionable students. The kids in this school might get the impression that the school is endorsing the utterance of religious names during sexual passion, and we can't have that kind of mixing of Church and State.
"A Gentleman Doesn't Kick a Lady Who's Flat On Her Back"
unless, of course, she asks him to do so
Tim, can you get Nick to post the vid to reason.tv?
thanks
My god, she was pixellating herself! I hope they give the kids some eye bleach.
Again, the question no one has dared ask, but I will (for the
good of the group):
Was she hot?
A lunch lady
in my town was forced to resign.
More
Anyway, idiot Dad "Joe" makes a good case for mandatory parenting
classes. Sounds like he has his own issues to deal with.
You're from Vineland, Tricky? The fearful sphere of South
Jersey.
This is the kind of scandal I'd expect out of a lowlife town like
Millville.
Actually, SomeGuy, the proper Dad response is to take the video, rip it to his computer, edit the video to remove the offending bit, reburn a clean DVD so the kid can watch, and save the offending bit to a difficult to find folder...should it become useful at some time in the future.
Mad Max ftw.
I have no problem with mandatory school prayer. Parents can just
keep their kids home an extra 15 minutes every day. The First
Amendment says "Congress shall make no law", and I'm pretty sure
they were talking about the U.S. Congress, so where did they get
the idea that it applies to public schools?
How is this teacher only in jeopardy of losing her job? Remember that sub who was sentenced to forty years in the slammer because of the porn lick she clinked in front of the class.
My kid's excellent teacher got laid off this year because she
doesn't have enough time in the union, so I'm not shedding any
tears for this person. Whatever the school decides to do with her
is fine by me.
To this person and everyone else:
Thats what's wrong with people now. Whether you are gay,
straight, single, married, divorce,"People have sex, that's what
we do. This was a mistake that the woman is truly sorry. Have
some compassion. People are so self righteous until their own
dirty little secrets comes to light. Stop condemning people
nobody's condemning you for every stupid thing that you do or
have done
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245