Tim Cavanaugh | June 26, 2009
The so-old-it's-new
Federal Housing Finance Agency has an interesting study [pdf] out of previous
depreciations in real estate markets.
Expected finding: The rapid-drop pattern of the last three years is, as I noted the other day, historically unusual. Usually the pace of decline is much slower over a long duration (obviously, we don't know when or if current markets will bottom out). Real estate values can take the better part of a decade to find the bottom, and about that long to recover to their prior peaks.
Unexpected (to me) finding: Although California, in a walk, has already taken five of the top ten total-depreciation spots for the period studied, it turns out Midland, Texas still holds the record for longest period from peak to trough:
Home prices in Midland, TX -- the worst [metropolitan statistical area] by duration of house price decline -- lost over 56 percent of their value from the second quarter of 1982 to the fourth quarter of 2000 and have yet to recover 8¼ years later.
Here are the ten biggest losers in total depreciation:

How long will Midland hold its place in the real estate Hole of Shame? I don't see Merced picking up anytime soon, but could it really be 2024 before that jewel of the San Joaquin Valley hits bottom? Elsewhere in the piece, FHFA flirts with measuring booms and busts in nominal rather than real dollars, which tends to make the return-to-previous-peak come faster. (That's the only anti-inflation rhetoric you're likely to hear from the government for a long time.) But even if you use that trick, "the time it takes for an area to recover still tends to be longer than the time it takes for the same area to move from peak to trough. Correspondingly, annual depreciation rates in the downturn tend to be of larger magnitude that annual appreciation rates in recovery."
Midland shared in the statewide oil boom of the 1970s and the subsequent oil collapse of the 1980s, which put nearly a quarter-million Texans out of work. The same cannot be said for the biggest clowns of this decade:
[M]ost of the larger historical downturns were caused by sharp increases in unemployment rates and shocks to personal income. Although the U.S. economy has experienced such conditions in the last year, those factors were not among the precipitants of the latest downturn, which began in 2006, well before the financial crisis erupted in the third quarter of 2007 and the recession began in the fourth quarter of 2007.
I vaguely recall a Thor comic from the 1970s in which the god of thunder is given a tour of hell by a grim reaper figure who starts off by whispering, "There is so little to see....and so much time!"
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Ahh, Lafayette, Louisiana rode that same oil boom that Midland,
TX did...it was going to be the next biggest city in Louisiana! Oil
was so magincal that it was going to turn UofLA-LA (ULALA) and
McNeese (Harvard on the Bayou) into something to rival LSU (already
low sights!).
And then it all withered away.
Oil is a helluva drug.
Damn it, wasn't McNeese, it was Nicholls that was/is/will remain
"Harvard on the Bayou."
And yes, that name was never a compliment.
"And then it all withered away."
Glad it did. The loss of Breaux Bridge, LA would have sucked. One
of the greatest places on earth (after Grand Isle, LA of
course).
Wai wai wai wai wait a second. Hooooold on just one second
there, podner...
I got Bill Maher on my TV set, telling me about the horrors of
Detroit, MI. Telling me that houses are going for a stick of gum
and a package of Razzles. And the Motor City doesn't even get a
mention in the top ten for depreciation?
What that tells me is Bill Maher may be fluffing his statistics, or
Detroit has been in the shitter for so long that a pack of Razzles
is actually considered a slight uptick.
What that tells me is Bill Maher may be fluffing his
statistics, or Detroit has been in the shitter for so long that a
pack of Razzles is actually considered a slight uptick.
Bill Maher is a dick and a half, but my guess would be the second
one.
So he's depreciated by 25%.
I'm not sure -- he's been holding steady, dickwise, for quite a
while now.
I got Bill Maher on my TV set, telling me about the horrors
of Detroit, MI. Telling me that houses are going for a stick of gum
and a package of Razzles.
The FHFA article has an interesting section on Michigan as the
reverse image of Texas. And You're a sucker if you accept payment
in both Razzles and gum, because Razzles is a gum (and a
candy).
As a former resident of Midland, Texas during the oil boom days,
getting a kick, etc.
Sam Houston Elementary
San Jacinto Junior High
Edison Freshman High (Now Midland Freshman High)
Midland High School Class of '80
George Bush may have lived there but he didn't go to school there
or live there very long.
These cities share a common feature - I'd rather die than live in any of them.
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island
The Quad Cities depreciated down to the Tri Cities.
I live in the suburbs of New York City. My town had 11,000 - 12,000 people in 1980. Today, it has 10,000 - 11,000 people, mostly due to declining family size. At the last council meeting, the council balked at the idea of allowing affordable housing. They said they didn't want to pay for kids from affordable housing units in their school districts. So, instead of growing in population, the town is slowly and steadily declining. It's kind of macabre watching the town I've lived in for 28 years slowly decay from the inside as the town elders congratulate themselves for legislating this demise.
All this talk of bubbles and busts has me wondering if we're talking about an economic crisis or an overworked plot for a porno.
If I recall correctly, the California housing bubble of the late
'80s also burst rather suddenly, and then clattered along the
bottom for a number of years until starting to pick up steam in the
late '90s. Prices may not have reached bottom overnight, but the
bulk of the drop occurred quickly.
This housing bubble seems different mostly in size and scope, not
in quality. Actually, the documented history of asset bubbles goes
back hundreds of years, and they all follow mostly the same
pattern, AFAIK.
On the other hand, I don't see prices rising again anytime soon.
How could they? Lots of people and institutions are tapped out, and
use of reasonable lending standards would never have permitted the
bubble to happen in the first place.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245