Katherine Mangu-Ward | June 8, 2009
Remember when all those
toys were full of
lead and everyone freaked out? Remember a full year later when
Congress passed badly-written,
redundant, do-something legislation? Remember when that
legislation went into effect and wound out scaring the bejeesus out
of small toymakers and others who suddenly found themselves
laboring under strict (and often pointless) testing requirements?
And remember when I wrote a big article about
this in the June issue?
It all seems so long ago.
And yet! After years of hullabaloo, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has finally gotten around to levying a $2.3 million fine against Mattel and Fisher-Price for violating a perfectly good law that went into effect in 1978. That law, of course, already banned all of the stuff that freaked people out in 2007.
From the Homemade Toy Alliance, which is leading the fight against the new law:
“One of the biggest frustrations with this issue is that Mattel and Fisher-Price broke a law that was already on the books, but the Congress reacted by writing another law that doesn’t improve the safety of children’s products on the market,” Mary Newell of Terrapin Toys (OR) states. “Instead, small companies get penalized for not having the capital to third party test their safe products, and Mattel and Fisher-Price get a financial slap on the wrist.”
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
And yet... And YET, lawmakers will fail to see the stupidity of the CPSIA and will not repeal it.
Repeal would make the overlords appear impotent.
More laws = more "freedom"
Only a conspiracy theorist would think that this is anything but a innocent mistake.
I love all the bullshit about rescuing the economy, helping The
Little Guy on Main Street.
They throw billions of dollars are giant failures while leaving
small business owners completely unable to get credit, so now they
have to lay off more people. And since small business owners employ
90+% of the people in this country, that's no small problem.
Then they make it illegal for any of those at-home by choice or by
circumstance to have a go at supporting themselves by some creative
endeavor.
Way to grind The American Dream into the dirt, Dear Leaders.
Bra-fucking-vo!
Hmmm... incoherent rant.
My humble apologies for the typorific nature of that last
post.
*sigh*
"These highly publicized toy recalls helped spur
Congressional action last year to strengthen CPSC and make even
stricter the ban on lead paint on toys," said CPSC Acting Chairman
Thomas Moore. "This penalty should serve notice to toy makers that
CPSC is committed to the safety of children, to reducing their
exposure to lead, and to the implementation of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act."
*FUMES*
Somebody rant for me, please. I'm too worked up.
Oh. For a while there, I thought you were going against the 1978 law, which, as you say, was perfectly adequate. As Mattel just found out.
Third party testing is no guarantee of compliance. Remember Arthur Andersen? Now we are saddled with Sarbanes Oxley BS. I have to push a button and sign in just to go into a room where our servers are located at work. Ridiculous.
Now we are saddled with Sarbanes Oxley BS.
Which, I might point out, has failed utterly. But won't be repealed
in my lifetime.
It seems like Ms Newell is saying the fine levied against Mattel should be larger. I wonder how much larger.
You people all missed the important part of this post!
Those stuffed space invaders are really cool.
"Instead, small companies get penalized for not having the capital to third party test their safe products, and Mattel and Fisher-Price get a financial slap on the wrist."
While gathering market share from small companies and the
effectively illegal toy resale market.
Don't throw me in that briar patch, Brer Congress.
These fuckhead dicks and twats on capitol hill have their heads
so far up each others ass ...
Okay we passed an monumentally imbecilic unneeded law because we were too goddam stupid to look and see whether applicable laws alreaddy existed.
So what if the law was overly broad and poorly written by the least intelligent shit for brain staffers of the most "challenged" committee memeber.
Nobody will notice that we lack the testicular fortitude necessary to admit we screwed the pooch on this one after numerous organizations pointed out the consequences that an above average 12 year old could have forseen.
It was in the news and we are such a bunch hystercal pussies in D.C. that we had to something, no matter how poorly thought out, no matter how much it rewards the very people who were responsible for this public relations fuck story in the first goddam place.
God I hate fucking congresscritters. Guess what lying incompetent
bastard signed the bill.
As I've been saying... We've got so many laws and regulations on the books that it's easier for the political class to simply pass new ones than it is to figure out what the old ones are.
Thank you, J sub D. Thank you kindly.
*kiss*
I packaged up a passel of aprons, bibs, overalls, and quilts for
consignment at The Makery on Bardstown Rd. here in
Louisville.
Who do you think will go to jail first? The owner of The Makery, or
me?
And to make my life even more of a joke, I'm going to spend the
rest of my day writing a Pre-IDE for the FDA. After reading 21 CFR
(parts 1 through 1499, thankyouverymuch) and finding "(332)
Antiflatulent products for over-the-counter human use"...
The Beano Regulation, ladies and gentlemen! Courtesy of your stupid
fucking government.
I'd suggest the best way to convince someone to become a
libertarian is to make them read the CFR.
The worst part about it is that now, almost a year after passing CPSIA, Congress STILL hasn't released the extra funding for the CPSC that would have allowed for better enforcement of the existing laws, PLUS they still only have two commissioners even though CPSIA raised the number of commissioners from three to five. CPSIA was supposed to "strengthen" the CPSC, but so far all it's done is required CPSC to enforce an unenforceable law with a staff that wasn't adequate to the task before the unenforceable law was passed.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245