April 13, 2009
For his debut
"Blood Diamond" column over at the new website True/Slant,
Reason Editor in Chief Matt Welch writes that Mothers
Against Drunk Driving is using the opportunity of the Angels
pitcher's tragic death to push through a questionable ignition
interlock law that almost certainly would not have prevented it.
People who think sports tragedies make for good criminal law, Welch
argues, need look only at the case of Len Bias.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I put that there to make sure Hit & Run regulars were reading closely.
Tangentially related: HrBunny told me a ski-helmet
law was being debated in response to Qui-Gon Jinn's wife
dying.
Oh Canada indeed.
FrBunny, if it had been enacted after the loss of elder statesman Sonny Bono, this tragedy could have been avoided.
People suffering from diabetes or hypoglycemia produce significant amounts of a compound called acetone. Acetone is sometimes identified as ethyl alcohol by breath analyzers, so someone with diabetes or hypoglycemia can appear legally drunk to a breath analyzer [ref].
Link
Fuck you MADD. Fuck you to death.
Speaking of crazy, militant, dumbasses, I saw a story over the weekend that PETA was pressuring the Pet Shop Boys to change their name to something less cruel.
Speaking of crazy, militant, dumbasses, I saw a story over the weekend that PETA was pressuring the Pet Shop Boys to change their name to something less cruel.
!!! please link!!!
"Speaking of crazy, militant, dumbasses, I saw a story over the
weekend that PETA was pressuring the Pet Shop Boys to change their
name to something less cruel."
Are you fucking serious...?
Please, tell me you're joking.
And SugarFree, use it to your advantage! You can actually be drunk
while driving but just say that you're diabetic! Of course if you
puke on the cops shoes and then claim to have fucked his wife
before passing out it kind of screws up the plan.
SugarFree,
I don't understand; that link went right to an appropriate
article.
It's like Wile E Coyote just caught the Roadrunner.
Kyle,
You bethca. I don't drive drunk, but it's nice to know I have the
option.
I don't understand; that link went right to an appropriate
article.
I've got a garbage bag of STFU under the desk, you know.
So how soon before MADD gets wind of the name of Reason's blog, and starts launching into a tirade? Or have the good folks at Reason already gotten e-mails on the "insensitivity" of the name?
"Rescue Shelter Boys"
My head hurts now...
And "Sea Kittens"?! Holy shit are these people a different kind of
stupid.
Well to be fair, not all hit and runs are done by drunk
drivers.
I remember getting so much shit in high school for wearing a
"DDAMM" t-shirt. DDAMM standing for Drunk Drivers Against Mad
Mothers. It was awesome.
It's been said before, but it bears repeating. PETA is awesome at shameless self-promotion.
Nude, Pregnant PETA Protesters Target Jamie Oliver
Money quote from Oliver:
"It's a slightly odd place for them to be protesting but
nonetheless they are welcome to do that. My main concern was that
they would get cold."
outlawing falling would also do the trick.
I read that as "outlawing failing" the first time
by, which is what our Congressional Nannytarians have been trying
(with zero effect) to do for decades.
Failure is *always an option*.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving. That's how they roll - using
high-profile tragedies to help push anti-drunk driving legislation
through the political process.
Minor quibble: I think they have progressed from
"anti-drunk-driving" to "anti-drinking".
Anybody who, while driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs,
kills another person should be tried for murder. However, if
somebody who has been drinking is pulled over while driving in a
controlled and appropriate manner (for a faulty taillight, for
example), I do not believe that person should be treated as a
murderer who has miraculously been apprehended in the act of
pulling the trigger.
And, as most people already know, words on paper (i.e., laws) are
not magic spells.
A guy who is willing to get shitfaced and drive around town
after his license has been taken away for doing that very
thing is probably not going to worry too much about finer
points of law, like installing an ignition interlock.
I can't imagine anyone thinking of circumventing the ignition
lock by having his passenger or his child start the car for him.
But just in case, there will have to be a law against it.
"Illegally starting a car" or something.
FrBunny, if it had been enacted after the loss of elder
statesman Sonny Bono, this tragedy could have been
avoided.
I'm not sure that passing a Sonny Bono-Michael Kennedy Ski Helmet
Act in the U.S. would have prevented Natasha Richardson from dying
in Canada.
But if Richardson had gone skiing in the U.S. and hit a tree, even
in the absence of such a law, she'd have had a better chance of
surviving than she did in Canada, since our wastefully expensive
health care system is so profligate with the availability of CT
scan equipment and medevac helicopters.
As long as we are going to play politics wit hthis, Nick would be on the DL and heading back this summer if the car had bounced off the van and hit dirt or another car. Instead they were thrown into a light pole. We need to stop putting lighpoles, trees, and other overly strong things right next to the road.
Approximation of an exchange I had with the MADD freaks.
Scenario: My sister is driving, her boyfriend is in the front seat.
I'm in the back seat. We're coming home from a ballgame. We run
into a roadblock. Each car is stopped by a cop standing at the side
of the road. Next to him is a housewife. We roll down the window.
"Have you been drinking?" "No, officer." Housewife leans forward to
give her elevator-pitch for MADD. My sister: "I understand what you
do, can I go now?" Housewife turns to cop, clearly displeased with
my sister's inability to play nice with normative road blocks. Cop:
"Helen here gave up her evening to help us prevent accidents and
raise awareness." My sister: "Terrific, if we're not being
detained, can we go now?"
Cop and "Helen" were mortified by my sister's unwillingness to be
awed by their intrusiveness, but the cop waved us onward because he
-- unlike Radley Balko's tedious rotten apples -- knew he had
precisely no reason to detain us further.
I remember when MADD was seen as something that prevented bad
things from happening. Now, when I hear their acronym, I think of
evangelicals, nosy desperate housewives, conservative PACS, drug
wars, and other wastes of sensible people's time.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245