Jesse Walker | February 5, 2009
In Forbes, Kathy Kristof takes on college loans,
arguing that
there is
an unfolding education hoax on the middle class that's just as insidious, and nearly as sweeping, as the housing debacle. The ingredients are strikingly similar, too: Misguided easy-money policies that are encouraging the masses to go into debt; a self-serving establishment trading in half-truths that exaggerate the value of its product; plus a Wall Street money machine dabbling in outright fraud as it foists unaffordable debt on the most vulnerable marks.
At one point Kristof tackles the oft-cited factoid that college grads earn $1 million more over their lifetimes than people who only made it through high school. She argues that the figure is misleading, but I have a more fundamental question about it: If such numbers are accurate, to what extent do they mean that a college degree makes your labor more valuable, and to what extent do they mean that college itself is overvalued? In a world of degree inflation—and unnecessary licensing laws—is college lubricating class mobility, or is it an expensive barrier between the classes?
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
In a world of degree inflation-and unnecessary licensing
laws-is college lubricating class mobility, or is it an expensive
barrier between the classes?
Mostly the latter.
There's another problem with the $1 million factoid: it doesn't prove that going to college caused the difference in earnings. It could well be that the people who go to college are on average smarter and/or better at taking direction and/or more ambitious than people who don't.
When I started college at UF, the tuition was $23/hour. Now it's something like $90/hour. Granting that it's been a while, but why has public school tuition increased at multiples of the inflation rate over the last 20 years?
Pro Lib,
subsidies.
I know you knew the answer, but in case anyone else was
wondering.
My older sister can sell ketchup popsicles to a woman in white gloves and she was turned down for a pharmaceutical sales job she would have been great at because she only has an associates degree and a dozen years of sales results. They would have hired me out of college right away because I have a BS in Geography but couldn't sell water to a thirsty millionaire in the desert. Degrees are overrated.
College, for a lot of people, has become the party reward for
graduating high school. You served your time in children's prison
(grade and high school), and now you're been paroled. You can
choose whether to go to class. You live away from mommy and daddy
with a ton of people your own age and 50% of the opposite sex. You
can get your hands on alcohol, drugs, and sex partners with
incredible ease.
It's sort of like Club Med for 18-year-olds. Except that you don't
have to pay until you leave, courtesy of student loans. Since most
18-year-olds are terrible with money, they just sign up for the
debt.
Grade inflation is just the colleges serving the customer. The
students paid for a degree and a party, god damn it, and they want
it. They didn't pay for an education.
There's another problem with the $1 million factoid: it
doesn't prove that going to college caused the difference in
earnings. It could well be that the people who go to college are on
average smarter and/or better at taking direction and/or more
ambitious than people who don't.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, there. Are you implying that correlation does not
equal causation?
No stimulus check for you!
I've got four kids. Three have prepaid tuition plans, but my
daughter does not. It's like $13,500 to sign her up for
one--seventeen years before she'll be old enough to attend! Time
value of money has no meaning with tuition, that's for sure.
And, as robc notes, my kids are paying a premium so other kids can
go to school for free. I'm sorry, but aren't I a taxpayer? How many
times do I have to pay for education?
Education should not cost something comparable to a house. Yet my
law school tuition could've bought me a small home. Even granting
that that's graduate school, it's still obscene.
It's yet another instance of government meddling totally fucking up
any home of rationality in the market. But if education ever
totally blows up, it'll be blamed on deregulation.
Nick,
While it sucks for your sister, it will also suck for the company,
as they will end up with an inferior salesperson.
There's another problem with the $1 million factoid: it
doesn't prove that going to college caused the difference in
earnings.
Yeah, that's the argument in the Forbes article. It's an
important point to keep in mind, though I think there have been
some studies of the earnings premium that at least attempted to
control for other factors.
Add in the fact that segregating the population by IQ and college readiness during prime pair bonding years means the college business is making it's own future clientel.
College, for a lot of people, has become the party reward
for graduating high school.
For the rest it's just where they get their high school level
education.
There's another problem with the $1 million factoid: it
doesn't prove that going to college caused the difference in
earnings. It could well be that the people who go to college are on
average smarter and/or better at taking direction and/or more
ambitious than people who don't.
Yep. Even with the shaky assumption that college doesn't teach
anything, a degree holder from a real school has demonstrated
they....are on average smarter and/or better at taking
direction and/or more ambitious than people who don't.
Employers like these things.
Education should not cost something comparable to a house.
Yet my law school tuition could've bought me a small home. Even
granting that that's graduate school, it's still
obscene.
Are you still paying off the debt? Do you make a good living? With
four kids, I would guess you make a good amount. Obviously, your
education paid off for you, and you were willing to pay for it.
That's not obscene, that worked.
I do think that student loans interfere with competition between
schools to lower prices. But the prices are still worth it to
people. When they get too high, people will stop paying. But right
now, telling a kid that after graduation they'll have to pay off
$100,000 in debt is like telling a child that if he eats all that
candy later he'll have a stomach ache.
You live away from mommy and daddy with a ton of people your
own age and 50% of the opposite sex. You can get your hands on
alcohol, drugs, and sex partners with incredible ease.
what else could explain a 6-year degree in art history?
Pro Lib,
In Floriduh's case, state funding has gone down correspondingly
(systemwide, not just at UF). If you take the total of state $ plus
tuition, the rate of growth of revenue isn't nearly so high. [
Insert standard "state shouldn't be funding college at all", etc.,
disclaimers here. ]
At a lot of colleges, the extra tuition goes toward wealth
redistribution as universities sell the increase by promising to
plow much of it back into various financial aid programs for
underrepresented groups.
I think that $1 million dollar difference is going to come way
down, if it ever was accurate in the first place, as more and more
students major in stuff like humanities, psychology, geography, and
education, that don't generally result in great jobs.
what else could explain a 6-year degree in art
history?
An overwhelming love of Klimt?
Try as I might, I cannot get that page to load. Must be a weird connection issue on my end. But I'm curious how the article -- which I imagine focuses on four year colleges -- relates to this piece from Brookings concerning stimulus support overstuffed but undersupported community colleges. I think it relates to your rate of return question, Jesse, since acknowledging name brand four year college degrees are overrated will also result in community (and technical) college degrees not being so undervalued. There are probably also valuable statistics somewhere out there about how many students find it worthwhile to transfer to full four year institutions versus those who find the two year degree sufficient for job hunting purposes.
Episiarch,
I don't agree. If I thought my tuition was even somewhat tied to
the marketplace, I'd accept the cost. But the full price I paid
(even with academic scholarships) was nothing compared to the
subsidized price many others paid. And that's with me coming from
the middle class. Actually, come to think of it, I got subsidized
loans myself, which also helped to drive up the overall cost.
They'll give graduate loans to dead people.
Frankly, I wonder what the real difference would be if I just spent
a couple of years reading casebooks and treatises, then went off to
take the bar exam. Probably very little. At most, that would cost
me a couple of thousand in books.
Epi,
Loans arent going away obviously. They need to make the kids put
20% down to get the loan like old-school mortgages.
Shit, I forgot the quote:
"Mr. Melon, your wife was just showing us her Klimt."
"You too, huh? She's shown it to everybody."
Frankly, I wonder what the real difference would be if I
just spent a couple of years reading casebooks and treatises, then
went off to take the bar exam. Probably very little. At most, that
would cost me a couple of thousand in books.
Madison did that and quickly found out the law was not for him.
Good thing he depend take out a loan for the 1st year of law school
before discovering that.
Doesn't it just depend on the college? I'm currently embarking on a three-year associate's degree in nursing and when I graduate I'll be making at least 50 thou. However, I made the mistake of going to a private college for two years after graduating HS (and switching majors three times) and now I'm $32000 in the hole. So you can make $1 million dollars more a year, it just depends on if you want to go to some artsy-fartsy liberal arts university and make kibbles when you graduate while paying off student loans or if you want to not pay too much and get a practical degree.
"Frankly, I wonder what the real difference would be if I just
spent a couple of years reading casebooks and treatises, then went
off to take the bar exam. Probably very little. At most, that would
cost me a couple of thousand in books."
Well, Frank Abagnale, Jr. passed the Louisiana State Bar Exam with
only two weeks of self-study.
I see it every day. When a dumbass gets a degree, the only thing that is different is that he has proved he can sit through those classes without falling asleep. Give me a truly smart person over a stupid well-educated one any day.
Another question to ask is what affect licensing has on degree
value? Many licenses require a degree.
Also many certifications for businesses required by state and
federal government require college educated employees. NELAC is one
of the ones I am familiar with, it requires lab techs to be college
educated - job description: follow a recipe and get a result - and
used to be done many HS grads.
I never see this mentioned in the value of calculation of
degrees
ProL, the point is that you felt it was a price you were willing
to pay--so you did.
Give me a truly smart person over a stupid well-educated one
any day.
It's SO easy to tell the difference, too.
Hmmmm. Well honestly I don't know. I do know that most degrees are worthless. Half the cocktailing and bartending staff have degrees. Problem is it's in shit like English, Literature, History, Art History, etc.
Finally got through. The article seems to blur the line between
two questions: Is college worth it ("college" broadly defined)? and
How did financial shenanigans screw over all sorts of college
students over the past decade or so? At the very least it seems
clear that the shenanigans made college a much more dangerous
proposition for a large number of students -- from lawyers to web
designers. The article doesn't really address how curtailing
private lending practices might affect prices -- or how the
situation looked before the privatization occurred (was the outlook
not so bad then?) -- which would seem to be a crucial question. In
the context of the Brookings piece above, I would wonder whether
pursuing greater federal funding of the community college system --
tied to the metrics like time-to-degree and not just number of
enrollees -- and purging private lending practices would begin to
yield prices more in line with what a (community) college degree is
properly worth.
j
I have to admit that, after taking the bar, I thought I could've
passed it with just the prep course alone. Or reading the materials
without the course. Although the Florida bar has essays, it's
really all black-letter law--most of the reasoning and the gray
areas of law school are chucked out altogether. I got full points
on a family law essay by pretty much just listing the fifty (okay,
maybe just thirty) factors to consider in an equitable
distribution.
Seemed that way to me, anyway.
Episiarch,
Yes, and I also pay my taxes. And people willingly pay blackmailers
and extortionists, too. Those aren't legitimate markets,
either.
zoltan,
The Skyway Man only mentions it once in his books. He has a
photographic memory. He likes to leave that IMPORTANT bit of info
out of his stories.
Yes, and I also pay my taxes. And people willingly pay
blackmailers and extortionists, too. Those aren't legitimate
markets, either.
Nobody put a gun to your head and made you go to school to become a
shark in a suit lawyer.
"The Skyway Man only mentions it once in his books. He has a
photographic memory. He likes to leave that IMPORTANT bit of info
out of his stories."
What the hell does this mean? I'm so lost right now.
The devil visited a lawyer's office and made him an offer. "I
can arrange some things for you, " the devil said. "I'll increase
your income five-fold. Your partners will love you; your clients
will respect you; you'll have four months of vacation each year and
live to be a hundred. All I require in return is that your wife's
soul, your children's souls, and their children's souls rot in hell
for eternity."
The lawyer thought for a moment. "What's the catch?" he asked.
True story: One of my crappy jobs before law school was as a
video store manager. I was working for a low salary myself, but my
six full or near full-time hourly workers all had college
degrees. One was retired, so maybe he doesn't count. Granted, the
economy at the time was crappy and the non-retired staff was young,
but that's insane.
Incidentally, one of the staff--who I promoted to Asst. Mgr. before
I left for greater things--was a film school graduate.
Episiarch,
Uh, huh. I think I'd be more bitter if I'd gotten my PhD in Physics
(I came within a hair of doing that when I was applying to law
school--which would've meant two solid years of post-bacc work just
to get started). Lots of debt and low salary. Lovely.
zoltan,
What it means is he remembers EVERYTHING! He probably scanned every
page in every law book he could get his hands on in Louisiana.
I think I'd be more bitter if I'd gotten my PhD in
Physics
Hey, I'm the retard who got a BS in Biology and BA in Anthropology.
Thankfully I've been programming since I was 10, and no one cares
about degrees in programming, just experience and knowledge.
"I know I'm a lawyer, but I took the bar in Alaska. They only have like four laws and most are about when you can kill seals!"
I was an early programmer, too. My dad pushed me to do that professionally (that was what he did early on, though he was an EE). He was probably right. Dammit.
I've been programming since I was 10, and no one cares about degrees in programming, just experience and knowledge.
Unfortunately, I'm finding that what they want is a career oriented
toward programming -- not degrees but certificates, and/or
experience with a job title of programmer or the like in a
particular language. I can program, and I can pick up any language
quickly enough to be coding in it in hours or days, but programming
has always been an adjunct to other activities for me, and it seems
nobody wants to hire me as a programmer when they see a resumme
that says "scientist" or "teacher" or "medical office flunkie" --
and I don't have certificates for either of the latter two
either!
Epi,
Lucky bastard. I stumbled on economics. I was originally a polymer
science major. They should have named it polymer engineering. I'm
just not geeky enough to hang around my house and do all that
higher math with equally geeky classmates and then go play D&D.
I looked at getting a chemistry degree and was shocked at the 30k a
year price tag. I mean, for Christ's sake, I make about 35k year
now. The college of business got wind of all my math and chemistry
and recruited me. Blissfully happy since.
Hey, I'm the retard who got a BS in Biology and BA in
Anthropology. Thankfully I've been programming since I was 10, and
no one cares about degrees in programming, just experience and
knowledge.
I started down the path towards a PhD in Plasma Physics. Probably
best I didnt finish it. Programming pays the bills.
THE URKOBOLD'S LAST DEGREE WAS IN PORN MANAGEMENT. LIKE RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT, BUT WITH MORE NAKED WOMEN.
Its now been over 15 years since Ive been paid based on my Nuke E undergrad degree.
I was not aware of Abagnale's nickname so I had no idea who you were referring to. Ah, Google.
My father always told me: "There's always a need for engineers.
So become an engineer. Because, to be perfectly honest, you're not
going to get by on good looks and charm."
I'm paraphrasing, of course, but my father tended towards brutal
honesty.
Sunday: "Do we have a Klimt?"
Boy Vampire: "Big score for Klimt! Monet still well in the lead,
but look out for Team Klimt coming from behind."
Sunday: "Freshmen. Man, they're so predictable."
Boy Vampire: "And you can never eat just one."
Economist, that's probably better than a parent who tended toward "You can do anything you want to do!"
I've told all four kids that technical or science degrees will be rewarded. Law degrees will be punished. When they want to make me visibly annoyed, they mention wanting to go to law school. In fact, my wife does that, too.
Despite my profession (engineering), I can't program worth shit. I took one computer science class (plus another that was major specific and required that class) in college, barely passed, and have tried to avoid programming ever since.
I went to school to study physics. Halfway through, a visiting
professor showed the salary comparison of BS vs PhD ten years after
graduation. The BS salary beat the shit out of PhD salary
(basically engineer vs college professor).
I took an engineering position after undergrad and never looked
back.
By the way, where is MNG to remind us of his terminal degree?
Jill Biden? Hello?
I think the big problem is that a middle-class 18-year-old has
basically been coddled since birth by either parents or school (or
both). Giving them x amount of time, which is usually less than two
years, to have them decide what they're going to do with the rest
of their lives and the repercussions of how they will pay for it is
a big mistake for most people at that age, though some obviously do
it successfully (with parental help, usually).
It's funny, I cannot imagine pursuing a humanities degree in the
information age. The liberal arts degree doesn't show that you have
obtained any skills beyond what you started with. I was told "you
can go to any school you want and be whatever you want to be". I
wanted to be a dinosaur, but instead became an engineer.
The engineering classes weren't particularly difficult and I had
ample time in my schedule to pursue philosophy, creative writing,
architecture, and a dash of music appreciation. It boggles my mind
why people think being a paying for a history degree will somehow
pay off.
"Urkobold™ | February 5, 2009, 1:40pm | #
THE URKOBOLD'S LAST DEGREE WAS IN PORN MANAGEMENT. LIKE RESTAURANT
MANAGEMENT, BUT WITH MORE NAKED WOMEN."
If this isn't the hyper-hetero ranting of a deeply closeted
homosexual, nothing is.
Trust your feelings, Urk.
I had to look up Edith Cowan University, and it turns out it's in Australia. Did the reporter just see them on a list of unusual majors and take a dig at them for surf science, or has there been an exodus of US college students that I'm unaware of?
GDD, let me help you out with Urkobold's cryptic emanations: You admit to being a closeted homosexual first.
WRONG ZOLTAN! THE URKOBOLD WAS SUGGESTING THAT GAY DAR DELUX
PERFORM SODOMY ON A MEMBER OF HIS OWN SEX FIRST. IF HE IS A SHE,
THEN THE URKOBOLD SUGGESTS DOING SO IN FRONT OF A WEBCAM.
YOU MUST FORGIVE THE URKOBOLD. ENGLISH IS NOT HIS FIRST
LANGUAGE.
Creative Writing BA, minor in Philosophy. Masters in Library Science. No student loans, luckily.
"I see it every day. When a dumbass gets a degree, the only
thing that is different is that he has proved he can sit through
those classes without falling asleep. Give me a truly smart person
over a stupid well-educated one any day."
Even worse: when a stupid person stupidly gets a degree in a
non-accredited program at a university, making his piece of paper
totally worthless.
"College, for a lot of people, has become the party reward for
graduating high school. You served your time in children's prison
(grade and high school), and now you're been paroled. You can
choose whether to go to class. You live away from mommy and daddy
with a ton of people your own age and 50% of the opposite sex. You
can get your hands on alcohol, drugs, and sex partners with
incredible ease."
This is only true if you are an LAS major. Engineering, Science,
and Architecture students usually spend their time in the lab or
studying.
I was watching a Warren Miller film the other night. Great quote
from one of the skiers:
If you can afford to go to college, you shouldn't go.
That's poetry.
Even though I have a B.A. in English Lit and a J.D., I am able to guesstimate that putting away $100,000 (which (a) won't cover one's costs at many colleges anymore and (b) does not include any savings achieved or the value of the experience gained from being in the workforce instead of college for four years) for the approximately 50 years one would survive after the would-be graduation date at a healthy but not terribly aggressive rate of 5% would yield in excess of $1,000,000.
When a dumbass gets a degree, the only thing that is
different is that he has proved he can sit through those classes
without falling asleep.
My personal experience was that 100% wakefullness was not a
requirement either.
I went to college and majored in history. And since 1983,all my jobs have been based on that major. I now have three degrees in the subject and now make a good salary. My parents paid for my undergraduate work (completed in four years) but I paid for all the graduate work. This required some loans, but I've now paid them off. So, it can be done. I once worked as a dishwasher, but that was before I got my B.A. I've also worked as a mail clerk, before I got my M.A. Not everyone will want to follow that path; it may be more difficult now than it was then (1970s/80s). But, you can do well (if not necessarily six figures) with a non-"practical" degree.
If we let corporate america keep staffing their workforce
to
- India
- China
- Phillipines
- Russia
- The rest of the third world
because americans MAKE TOO MUCH MONEY...well, then what's the point
of college.
The minute you start making a lot of money in Corporate America...u
r a TARGET. They want to get rid of you and bring in someone
cheaper.
Here in NYC...it's either someone younger, someone in India, or
someone in another part of US that makes less.
Yes, that's capitalism. But if you just let it go its natural
path...there's no point. We all might a well sell crack on 145th
street.
Programming saved my ass. I graduated with an MBA in finance
from SUNY Buffalo. I moved furnature in a warehouse, managed a Taco
Bell, did temp work for the SBA, and was a commercial credit
analyst. None of these positions paid more than the mid 20s.
Within one year of changing to programming my salary was over
70k.
Unfortunately, this statistic would be counted in the college
earnings average. It had nothing to do with college and I regret
the wasted time.
PHALKOR! SINCE MASON IS TOO UNMANLY TO RESPOND ON HIS OWN
BEHALF, HE HAS ENGAGED THE URKOBOLD TO RESPOND FOR HIM:
"PHALKOR, YOU ARE A WORK OF FRICTION."
I swear I read a different article, but one that used the exact same individuals interviewed in the LA Times a few weeks ago - yet I can't find any reference to it. Same Author peddeling the same story to multiple publications?
But right now, telling a kid that after graduation they'll
have to pay off $100,000 in debt is like telling a child that if he
eats all that candy later he'll have a stomach ache.
Yep.
Student loans are an excellent way to get people hooked on debt.
They're certainly justified for occupations that pay a nice wage
premium, otherwise they're mostly a waste of money. Certainly most
people who have little choice but a student loan would benefit from
2 years at a junior college but far too many think such a path is
beneath the.
I have to admit that, after taking the bar, I thought I
could've passed it with just the prep course alone.
Pardon my sounding like Jesse Walker, but I think the lead
guitarist of Country Joe & The Fish did exactly that.
A lot of money goes into the administrative overhead needed to
deal with federal and state financial aid programs, grant
processes, and such.
A lot is also bureaucratic bloat caused by the proliferation of
specialized departments like "Chicano Studies". I don't think any
of the ethnic or gender studies departments are self-financing.
They're mostly academics leeching off of the science and
engineering departments, which is where the money comes from.
That is if you can count receiving publicly funded research grants
as legitimate sources of income.
Almost nobody actually pays full tuition anyway. Most students get
a pell grant or some other kind of scholarship.
But education is only a waste for people who take stupid trendy
majors like gender studies.
Anyone with a lick of sense ought to know that won't get you a
decent job.
A CS degree on the other hand is pretty much a guarentee of future
employment, assuming that you aren't a total slacker.
However, as far as business management, arts, and music are
concerned, the article is correct. I don't know any artists or
musicians who actually benefitted from getting a degree.
And people with management degrees generally end up stuck as
middle-managers. They aren't the type to own their own business, so
they never get really rich.
I think much of your success after college is related to the
business cycles position when you graduate. If you graduate during
a boom, you will probably get a position related to your career
goals. If you graduate during a recession, you will probably find
it difficult to get relevent experience. After a few years, your
prospects for professional employment are nearly zero.
I am a bit surprised that noone advises current students to take
some time off and return to graduated when the economy is better. I
would have done much better in finance if I had waited until 1996
to get my MBA instead of getting it in 1992.
College is even more expensive than the tuition would suggest.
There's the opportunity cost.
Take two people: one goes to college for four years, the other goes
through an apprenticeship to be an electrician.
The college kid will come out maybe $100,000 in debt. During that
time, the electrician will have earned maybe $150,000, and will
have four years of job experience and a journeyman's ticket. He may
be married and have a house and a credit rating.
So right off the bat, the college kid is starting a quarter of a
million dollars behind. If they did nothing else, and the tradesman
took half his earnings and put it in a 40 year investment, then
even if the college kid earns a million dollars more over his
professional life, he will never catch up.
But around here, a journeyman in a good trade makes far more money
than your average college grad. I'm a senior engineer in a large
company, and my brother is a tradesman, and he makes significantly
more money than I do.
It used to be that degrees in the humanities were luxuries to be
pursued by the idle rich. If you were poor, you studied a trade, or
you worked your ass off in school to get scholarships, or at best
you went to college and made sure you studied a field that would
allow you to pay back your student loans.
But then the government got involved, and subsidized the hell out
of education, and created easy money programs like interest-free
student loans that could be had with no credit rating. And they
told everyone that college was damned near mandatory for success.
So the kids flooded into the colleges - half of them having no
business being there - and the colleges, like the rent-seekers they
are, used the infusions of cash to jack tuition through the roof
and feather their own nests.
Standards were watered down so that all the kids could go, so now
we have millions of people entering the workforce with no real
skills, not much of an education, and debt up to their eyeballs.
And we're short on people who actually know how to build and
maintain things. So we're a society of paper pushers and consumers,
heavily in debt and thinking we're much smarter than we really
are.
NOW THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT WORKS OF FRICTION. WE CALL THOSE TEST-TUBE BABIES.
Good point Dan. There is a serious market distortion caused by
the government.
Colleges are producing far more graduates than the market needs.
This is also creating far fewer skilled workers that the market
needs. The wages for college educated people are falling while
those for skilled trades are rising.
These million dollar studies are backward looking by nature. I bet
the wage differential will be far less going forward. I also would
wager that the lifetime earnings for skilled workers compared to
college educated ones will show a negative earnings advantage for
degree holders.
Auto mechanics with certifications id fuel injection or computer
diagnostics make 80k a year. This is much more than your typical
college graduate will ever earn.
I call it a scam.
There are significant legal obstacles for employment tests or
reasonable employment requirements in general; there is case law
wherein asking a job candidate to demonstrate proficiency at the
task required by the job is deemed discriminatory (quite a lot of
it, in fact).
This greatly increases the value of job credentials --- and of
course, the primary business of colleges and universities is to
provide job credentials.
One of the primary reasons for the growth in the higher education
sector -- both in terms of the number of students and the costs ---
is that employers view colleges as a mechanism for passing on the
costs (legal and otherwise) of screening applicants. That the
process is grossly inefficient is of no consequence to employers as
they bare none of the costs (or only a very small portion, very
indirectly).
Good administrators are well aware of this fact --- which is why
the graduation rates for AA students (affirmative action) are low
and their degrees are primarily in nonsense (even more so than the
usual).
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245