Reason.com

Print|Email

Tuesday Morning Variety Pack

* Matt Labash visits Detroit.

* Patrick Cockburn demystifies Deep Throat.

* Daniel McCarthy reviews the career of a quasi-libertarian senator.

* Yasheng Huang reconsiders the sources of China's economic growth.

* The perils of Godwin's Law.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

jimmydageek|12.23.08 @ 8:40AM|

cockburn - deepthroat

someone has his mind in the gutters this morning!

|12.23.08 @ 9:34AM|

That Labash piece took me completely by surprise. Not the sort of thing I ever would have expected to see in the Weekly Standard.

Jesse Walker|12.23.08 @ 10:23AM|

Not the sort of thing I ever would have expected to see in the Weekly Standard.

Labash specializes in those.

robc|12.23.08 @ 10:28AM|

Jesse,

The (common) misapplication of Godwin's Law makes that xkcd less funny. This is my favorite.

Jesse Walker|12.23.08 @ 11:11AM|

He could do a sequel where Mike Godwin pops out and explains that his law is descriptive, not prescriptive, thus allowing the Allies to win WW2.

|12.23.08 @ 11:36AM|

Here's a thought.

The firemen in Detroit should concentrate on preventing the uncontrolled spread of fires, while allowing abandoned eyesores to burn to the ground.

|12.23.08 @ 1:27PM|

Incidentally, folks can check out Charlie LeDuff's website for several of the articles Labash mentions. It was actually after someone sent me a link to the "Flight of the Dead" story that I began to realize just how much of LeDuff's work I'd read and enjoyed.

Anon

|12.23.08 @ 1:39PM|

Also, from the McCarthy review:

"He won acquittal for a woman who had shot her husband dead, in full view of witnesses, at a card table."

There is no further context given for this statement. In the context of the article it is clearly meant to be laudatory. But since I read Balko, I immediately thought it was one of those weird logic puzzles, where the answer is he was holding a dog.

Anon

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245