Jesse Walker | October 7, 2008
Alcoholic drinks have been forbidden on Belmont University's campus since at least 1951. The small Christian school in Nashville has decided to make an exception to the rule when it hosts a presidential debate Tuesday.
Unfortunately, this doesn't mean the live audience will be able to play drinking games or just blot out the horror with beer, wonderful beer. The drinks will only be served in a hospitality tent for reporters -- further proof, I suppose, that politics and the media undermine traditional morality.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I wonder if reporters for the school paper will be admitted to the hospitality tent.
If you think about it, it's actually a pretty cool thing for them to do. They don't want to drink on campus (you wouldn't attend the college if you did), but they're letting guests do so if they want.
Do you think they'll mind if use my preferred drug of choice? God created mine. Is that reason enough?
The drinks will only be served in a hospitality tent for
reporters
We had to, or none of them would have come.
I work on a dry campus too. Funny how they never seems to arrest
all the football taligaters who bring multiple kegs onto to
campus.
CYA is the rule of the day, but it don't pay the bills.
Like all loyal, patriotic Americans, I'm outraged, yes outraged
that McCain and Obama are holding a debate at a University doesn't even have a football
team!
Reading what passes for reportage in MSM publications, I'm not
surprised that the hack writers are a bunch of souses.
We had to, or none of them would have come.
The wise and the foolish are all alcoholics. The sober are the
boring in between.
There isn't enough whiskey to get me to sit through one of
those "debates".
Seconded.
Agreed. I'd go to about anything but an Amway sales pitch if you promise me a free drink tent.
My wife is back from her conference. She says she's going to punch me in the brains if I watch the debate. She's right, as usual.
I once was assigned to cover an economic-development conference
in Tullahoma, Tenn., home of George Dickel and not too far from the
home of Jack Daniels. All attendees got free samples.
*hic*
Ah, Dickel... my favorite of the semi-bargain tenn-whiskeys. Oh, please, sophomore year of college, forgive me for forsaking you!
With the drinking age at 21, most campuses are de facto
"dry" anyway.
I think you mean de jure, not de facto. The kids are still
drinking, trust me.
With the drinking age at 21, most campuses are de facto
"dry" anyway.
Really? Count freshmen, sophomores, and some juniors v. the rest of
the juniors, seniors, grad students, non-traditional (older)
students, faculty, and staff. I'd think it would balance
>21.
There isn't enough whiskey to get me to sit through one of
those "debates".
I prefer to clean guns or reload ammo. Not at the same time, of
course. Too much temptation.
The kids are still drinking, trust me.
No one drank on campus at my school. It was less hassle to find an
off-campus party or even just present your fake ID at a bar.
J sub D:
I went to a private university that dropped out of NCAA football
years before I matriculated. The % of schools playing in the Bowl
Division that are private is pretty small. Take a look at the top
25, and you can count the private schools on one hand.
What's unAmerican are all those @#$%^&*~! tax-eating state
universities.
Belmont and Washington are private, as is Hofstra, the site of the
next debate-like simulation. What strikes me as odd is that Ol'
Miss, a publik skool, managed to snag a spot on the venue list. I
thought the debate commission was going with private universities
in order to have a stronger position when protesters get arrested
for trespassing.
Kevin
No one drank on campus at my school.
I know for a fact there's lots of on-campus drinking at the two
schools I have any familiarity with.
For "dorm parties" the students have migrated to hard alcohol
rather than beer. Kegs are hard to sneak anywhere; fifths, pretty
easy. Once again, prohibition has managed to encourage, not
discourage, abuse.
There isn't enough whiskey to get me to sit through one of those "debates"....sure there is, or is blind, stinking, knee walking, piss drunk that far away for you?
kevrob,
Tell me you didn't take my comment seriously and are just playing
along. Please.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245