Jesse Walker | November 26, 2007
New York interviews the fan video auteur Luminosity, with a conversation that covers copyright enforcement, feminism, and the history of visual remixes:
Vids are fan-made music videos. We create them using scenes taken from our favorite TV shows and movies, pairing them with a particular piece of music and imposing our own video-editing choices and style....
Vidding started in 1975 with Kandy Fong, a Star Trek fan, who made the first ever vid, at a convention, by setting a slideshow to music. Almost as soon as VCRs became available, fans started using them to make vids, which were shown mainly at fan conventions or passed around on tape by mail. Computers and the Internet have made it a lot easier both to make vids and to share them—now everyone wants to make things like vids. Vidding is not a static art form. It is subject to waves and schools, just like any other art. It may have started with parody, but now it has progressed, I think, into modern and postmodern interpretations of the source.
Caveat: That may be the history of vidding as a self-conscious community of fan producers, but the practice itself is actually older than that. Go here and here to see what one acclaimed remix artist created in 1936. Go here to see Luminosity's contributions to the tradition.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Fair use? Who the hell knows? We should have all majored in copyright law. Thar's gold in dem dere hills!
I once saw a "vid" of Jeff Buckley's Hallelujah cover
on YouTube.
It consisted of a black screen for most of it, with the word
"Hallelujah" popping up in big white letters every time Buckley
sang that particular lyric.
I imagine some religious asshole made it, trying to co-opt the
songs for some Bible reading or something.
If only they knew who Leonard Cohen was...
Jesse, did you go to film school, or just do a bit of side reading? First the Frederick Wiseman interview, now a link to Rose Hobart. What's next, a study of the libertarian implications of Makavedjev's Innocence Unprotected? Or perhaps Wajda?
Side reading & side viewing. Who needs film school in the
age of home video?
Anyway, Wajda made one of my favorite films of the '80s
(Danton), and while Innocence Unprotected isn't
one of the two or three Makavejev movies I've seen I did enjoy
W.R. quite a bit.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245