Radley Balko | September 24, 2007
This Bush Q&A from last April seems rather relevant now.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Don't his handlers like prepare him and stuff? Like, you know, to artfully answer or even dodge questions? No one really expects the president to be an expert on everything, and, perhaps, it would be nice if they didn't pretend that they were. However, I don't exactly feel a great deal of confidence in the current occupant when he seems scared of some college kid (I assume) asking him a question.
Oops, my handlers screwed up. Let's restate: No one really expects presidents to be experts on everything, and, perhaps, it would be nice if they didn't pretend that they were.
So, Uh, Did Rummy Ever Get Back to You?
What difference would it make? It sounds like Rumsfeld had lied to
the questioner about Order 17 previously.
No one really expects the president to be an expert on
everything
Sure, but the laughter all around -- from president, questioner,
and audience alike -- does not bode well for the health of the
republic.
W: So, Don, I had this question come up at a Q&A. What law
applies to private contractors in Iraq?
Rummy: Well, Mr. President, that's an easy one. You see, [crinkles
piece of paper near phone] oh, wait. Hold, on. I'm in a ... bad ...
cell ... have to ... call .... later [hangs up].
oncogenesis,
Actually, I'd prefer that the presidency (and the rest of the
federal government) be so weak that this sort of ignorance would be
of little consequence.
Four and half years into this and they don't know what law
Blackwater has to abide by?
Question: When Blackwater operated in New Orleans under a state
of emergency, what law did they have to follow? None?
Question: When Blackwater operated in New Orleans under a state of emergency, what law did they have to follow? None?
Don't be silly. Iraqi law, natch.
Maybe they have some mal-practice insurance?
You know, in case an operation goes badly?
Seriously, this is one time I'd be rooting for the Trial
Lawyers.
I am not a fan of the President's by any stretch but it seems to
me that the issue of private contractors, in a war zone, is
interesting but a side issue.
Again, I'm no fan but I found the candor refreshing. I cannot
recall another president as comfortable with the concept "I don't
know."
I was also quite impressed with the questioner.
Bill Walsh
William Walsh -- I don't disagree that it was refreshing to see a politician say "I don't know" when he didn't. For me, however, the problem wasn't the non-substance of the response, but the smirking, juvenile way Bush acted during the entire conversation. I really don't understand how anyone can look at him and think, "Leader."
"I am not a fan of the President's by any stretch but it seems
to me that the issue of private contractors, in a war zone, is
interesting but a side issue."
Total fucking bullshit.
William Walsh,
Take a wild guess at who represents the second largest security
force in Iraq. You guessed it! It's the "side issue" guys!
So, to sum up for the pres and his obtuse fellow travelers, the
second largest security force in Iraq is running around in the war
zone of Bush's own creation, mowing people down at will, beholden
to no laws, and it's a side issue for you and apparently to Bush. I
guess it's on par with that Shia Sunni Kurd thing that Bush also
chose not to learn about before he pushed for invasion.
So maybe you can help me out and let me know what the real issues
are.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245