Brian Doherty | September 5, 2007
A survey of his voting record--he voted with his party 85 percent of the time.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Any idea what the spread of vote-with-party might be for GOPers
and Ds on average might be, for comparison purposes?
I mean, he's clearly more of an independent thinker than, say, any
of the representatives from Texas, but it'd be interesting to see a
histogram of vote-with-party percentages.
I mean, he's clearly more of an independent thinker than,
say, any of the representatives from Texas
More independent than Ron Paul - Texas, R?
"...he's clearly more of an independent thinker than, say, any
of the representatives from Texas..."
Just out of curiosity, don't you think it's possible to be an
independent thinker who agrees with a major political party much of
the time? Or is "independent" now a synonym for "deviant"?
OK, I admit I was just mentally editing Paul out of the Texas
stats.
Mostly I was thinking of Sam Johnson, who bragged about how well he
voted with the party.
As we approach the sixth anniversary of the tragic events of
9/11 it is important for the sake of the victims of the terrorists
attacks, and for the sake of preventing such a disaster from
happening ever again that we remember what happened on that day,
however it is even more important that we remember correctly how
the events happen.
Unfortunately (and yet, predictably) there exist certain factions
in this country, and across this world who actively seek distort
the reality of what happened on that fateful day. Although in
membership in the beginning of the 9/11-Conspiracy moment was
limited to those who wished to promote their anti-capitalist and
anti-Semitic agendas, in recent years these ideas have spilled out
into the mainstream with the help of internet memes such as Loose
Change. Although in first glance, the claims of the 9/11 Truth
Movement seems to be meticulously researched, upon closer
inspection the theories fall apart. The conclusions of are not one
reached through scientific reason by through the use of
out-of-context quotes, fuzzy science, and lies by omission.
Did 9/11 happen exactly how we believed to happen? Most likely not;
it took years after the Titanic sinking and the Hindenburg
explosion to find out the engineering specifics of what made the
disasters happen. However, when the day comes we find out the true
"truth" behind what happened on 9/11 it is more likely to be
something benign in nature when compared to the improbable concepts
such as controlled demolitions, unpiloted planes, and phone calls
using digitally altered voices of the passengers of the
planes.
The events of 9/11 was horrific enough; to pervert the memory of
those who died that day and the lessons that could be learned from
that terrible, terrible event by yielding to conspiracy mongers
only serve to compound what was already a horrible tragedy.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245