Radley Balko | June 29, 2007
The Reason Foundation has released its annual ranking of state highway systems across America. Noth Dakota, South Carolina, and Kansas top the list. New York, Alaska, and New Jersey get the golden pothole award.
Full report, press release, and data here. Interactive map where you can locate your state here.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Not surprised to see Massachusetts so low.
The state and federal money that would have been keeping up the
road system as a whole has been shoveled into the Big Dig for a
decade.
Is Maryland so bad it's unranked? I only looked at the interactive map, but I couldn't find it. I also didn't see DC on there.
A facile analogy of taxes as "payments" for "services":
You order a hamburger, they charge you for a steak, and you get a
room temperature tofu dog.
Would you recommend that restaurant?
Kid Handsome
They labelled Delaware as Maryland! And they labelled New Jersey as
Delaware...
In addition, we also have the wonderful state of "Noth Dakota" . . . that must be the home to all of Cheney's undisclosed locations.
Having spent a lot of time driving on SC highways, I can't see how they are ranked as the 2nd best in the country. The streches of I-95 are some of the worst pavement I've seen in years.
Oh how proud I am to be from New York. At least we have the 6th lowest fatality rate... although, I guess that's not taking into account the fatalities of cars' suspensions.
SugarFree - Nice, and I would only emend to: You are ordered to receive a hamburger, etc.
I-90 in NY is the Thruway. Some of the nicest road I've ever
driven. Always happy to pay the $2.00 from Rochester to Buffalo.
Back in the days of 55mph speed limits, if you were doing 70 the
state troopers would pass you by. No other law enforcement was
allowed. Niagara to Syracuse can get some nasty winter weather. The
big plows and salt keep the Thruway moving.
I don't know if it's still true, but the Thruway authority also ran
the locks and drawbridges on the Erie Canal.
Warren -
I don't drive that stretch a lot myself, but while the tolls used
to be used to maintain the roads (which, given how much winter
weather they get, are pretty well cleared most of the time), much
of the tolls are now used to fund other things that are under the
control of the Thruway Authority, such as the Erie Canal.... who
knows, but they certainly don't tell us much about it.
Balsim, Warren,
This was a study of "state-owned roads and highways." Not the
interstate system.
Why the interstate system is in better shape in some states than in
others is an interesting question, though.
It should also be noted that when the Thruway was built, they promised that the tolls would be used to pay-off the construction of the road, and once it was paid for, the tolls would be eliminated. Yeah, that never happened. They got used to having the funds.
I'm surprised Californicate is not the worst. Still a shame at
44th worst because this is the state that invented the car culture
and the freeway. California's roads were once the finest in the
known world.
I blame illegals. :-)
Actually 90% of our budget goes to education, social services, and
MediCal. That don't leave much for asphalt and bridge repair.
Worst, I mean absolute worst, highway I've ever driven is the Pennsylvania Turnpike. And they have the cajones to actually charge people to use that thing.
Reinmoose,
I remember back in the 80's there was some rumbling in the state
legislature to do away with the tolls. I'm glad they didn't, the
tolls are what kept the traffic down and the maintenance up. And a
lottery tax (i.e. speeding tickets) free zone, as well I think.
It's been a few years since I've been on it. I think they need to
raise the tolls. It's been getting pretty crowded.
Of course, as a good libertarian I'd prefer the roads be privately
owned and operated.
For perspective we should note that American roads are some of the world's finest (outside of Europe and Japan).
TWC:
IMO, Pennsylvania has the worst roads because they are
constantly under construction and are never completed. But
those are the interstates, which aren't explored in this study.
They also have the most over-developed road system I've ever seen,
and many of their local roads resemble highways. Personally, I
wouldn't want a concrete barrier running down the middle of a road
in my town.
Warren: Agreed. Too bad Amtrak is a piece of shit along that
corridor and still manages to be more expensive than driving with
the tolls. I'm going to visit some friends in Rochester in a couple
of weekends and I'm taking Amtrak to get there, despite the fact
that it's more expensive than gas+tolls.. I try to figure in milage
on my car, but I don't know how to assess that cost.
whatever.
Of course, as a good libertarian I'd prefer the roads be
privately owned and operated.
Bingo
Of course North Dakota is number one.
There's like three old Chevys and a goat using the road...
"Worst, I mean absolute worst, highway I've ever driven is the
Pennsylvania Turnpike. And they have the cajones to actually charge
people to use that thing."
Amen to that. Among the worst 10 hours of my life were spent
driving the PT in a 18' Uhaul packed to the gills.
I remember when NM had bad roads and good schools. Then we got a
libertarian gov who fixed the roads and let the schools go to shit.
Now they seem to be doing pretty well with both at the same time.
Can't imagine what's next.
Commonsewer:
The Pa 'Pike is getting better, but only in the western part of the
state where they've done a lot of recent construction. Eastern
'Pike still sucks.
Oh how proud I am to be from New York. At least we have the
6th lowest fatality rate... although, I guess that's not taking
into account the fatalities of cars' suspensions.
Kind of hard to have a fatal accident if the cars can't move.
I also didn't see DC on there.
Rule of thumb. If it's "fifty states" D.C. won't be one of
them.
They labelled Delaware as Maryland! And they labelled New
Jersey as Delaware...
The New Jersey tag is in New York City harbor. All those dinky
states run together.
I thought it was really interesting that eight states; Texas, North
Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, Missouri,
West Virginia, and Kentucky, have more state
highway miles than California.
Grotius,
"For perspective we should note that American roads are some of the
world's finest (outside of Europe and Japan)."
So we beat what, Africa, South/Central America, and parts of Asia?
Not bad for the richest country in the world.
Worst, I mean absolute worst, highway I've ever driven is
the Pennsylvania Turnpike.
That's where I score the highest when I play Count the Deer
Carcasses.
Neu Mejican,
And Antartica. I would guess European Russia and portions of
Eastern Europe as well. ;)
I try to figure in milage on my car, but I don't know how to assess that cost.
What won't I do for my
friends at Reason!
I had a jazz history class at Pitt, in which the professor told
me about his days on tour. (He actually played with Miles Davis
once or twice)
Apparently, the PA Turnpike was considered severely cursed in the
minds of 60's-70's jazz musicians.
He added that more jazz musicians died on that stretch than any
other in the country (Often traveling the NY-Pittsburgh-Chicago
circuit)
Joe
Interstate highways are part of a State's highway system. They are
just another class therein, with a different level of federal
funding (usually about 95%) and with some criteria imposed by the
Federal Highway Works Administration. They are still counted as
part of the state's road inventory.
Note that three of the eight categories that were rated applied to
interstates.
Several people mentioned that federal interstates aren't in this
study.
California has a large number of highway miles that are jointly
owned/financed by BOTH state and federal gvt.
That was done to obtain federal highway money and if the Reason
Study does not look at any road that is federally financed then
there aren't any roads in California to look at. I mean the
Pasadena Freeway morphed into I-110, Santa Ana/Golden State
Freeways morphed into I-5, San Diego Freeway (which doesn't get
within 75 miles of San Diego) became I-405. Etc.
Almost every mile of freeway in California is a federal interstate
by virtue of funding.
They suck too. Just as badly. In fact, they're probably worse.
M -
Thanks, but I guess I didn't articulate very well what I meant. I
keep pretty good tabs of my car's MPG (especially easy on long
trips), but I was trying to refer to how much the added
milage/driving would add in maintenence costs on my car. Sometimes
I use the standard mileage reimbursement rate, but that just seems
so high ($0.485)
Looks to me like the study does include the interstate highway
system.
From the study:
In most states these [roads] are generally the interstates and other major U.S.-numbered and state numbered
roads
Worst, I mean absolute worst, highway I've ever driven is the Pennsylvania Turnpike. And they have the cajones to actually charge people to use that thing.
TWC, I concur. Driving the Penn. turnpike is a hours long
flee/flight experience that leaves me physically, mentally and
emotionally drained. Basically I'm scared shitless or pissed off
the entire trip.
BTW, I noticed my hone state of Michigan was rated below West
Virginia and Arkansas. Not a surprise, but humbling nontheless.
"Gridlock isn't going away," said David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., the
study's lead author.
Gee, ya think? Is my Reason subscription money paying for this? I
notice that Massachusetts has the safest highways and Montana the
deadliest. "Live free or die"? Maybe that should be "Live free and
die". I'm also underwhelmed by the fact that construction costs are
cheaper in South Dakota than in Jersey. This study seems to be
aiming at a "libertarian policies mean good highways" moral that I
find damn near invisible. Shouldn't highways be privatized?
Several people mentioned that federal interstates aren't in this study.
As I noted above:
"three of the eight categories that were rated applied to interstates."
And:
"Interstate highways are part of a State's highway system. They are just another class therein, with a different level of federal funding (usually about 95%) and with some criteria imposed by the Federal Highway Works Administration. They are still counted as part of the state's road inventory."
M,
I agree with that as well, but I was going for more of "I'd like to
have a road to drive on, they tax me enough to build a four-lane
highway, and I generally get a dirt path."
If I'm going to have to eat here, I get to complain about the
prices or the service, preferably both, but at a bare minimum one
or the other.
I think microlibertarianism (local level) is easier to explain to
the regular folks than macro concepts like getting rid of the Dept.
of Education (which, of course, I'd like to do as well.) If wanting
to reduce taxes is written off as being "uncharitable," then I'd
like to see the defense for poor service.
JKP, the southerly freeway (70/76 ?) coming out of the 'Burgh is
actually pretty good (or it was). One thing that struck me was the
rest stops. They were clean and had TILE on the walls. Unheard of
in our fair state.
If you travel the I-10 across the desert the rest stops in Ca are
ghastly. Cross into Az and they ain't great, but they're clean and
usable. Same clientèle yet completely different states of
cleanliness. Pun intended.
Alan -
I think you're confusing two types of libertarians.
You have the faux-libertarians who want their blessed holy roads to
continue to be funded and maintained by the government, but they
don't want any rules guiding how they drive, whether or not they
wear their seatbelt, if they can talk on a cell phone, etc.
Then you have the actual libertarians, who want the roads to be
privatized. The private owner of the roads can develop rules of
conduct as they see fit and enforce them with whatever fines or
whatever they wanted.
What won't I do for my friends at Reason!
The calculator desn't factor in depreciation of the auto. That is
not good.
Is my Reason subscription money paying for this?
I doubt if subscription money even covers the cost of printing the
magazine. :-)
Reason survives on donations. Lots of them, large and small.
Based on my so-far limited experience of the Dallas-Fort Worth
area, I'm a bit surprised that Texas roads ranked so well. Then
again, it is monsoon season here (forget global warming, when the
hell is someone going to do something about the weather in Texas?)
and the poor drainage means I spend about a third of my time on the
road hydroplaning (no fun in a Miata!)
I can't say I was all that impressed with European roads, btw.
Sure, the autobahn and non-German equivalents to our interstate
highway system are kept in good repair, but try taking a scenic
road trip off the autostrade in Italy sometime.
RM, excellent points. I would point out, however, that there was
a time when fuel taxes closely resembled a sort of user fee that
was economically connected to driving. The more you drove the more
you paid toward the cost of highways. Long haul truckers paid a lot
of fuel taxes and those ghastly Volkswagens paid very little. A
rough correlation between use and tax.
That's not much true anymore although the fuel taxes do still make
up a huge chunk of that three buck a gallon gas.
The other problem with the fuel tax scenario is that it leaves
localities out of the picture because only the state and feds get
the money.
BTW, I am a real libertarian, let's privatize the roads. Hear that?
That's the sound of 300 million Americans LOL at my foolish
remark.
Why the interstate system is in better shape in some states than in others is an interesting question, though.
This is not particularly mysterious considering that like
other state highways interstates are designed and built by
State DOTs*. FHWA impose some design criteria to qualify for
federal funds but other than cursory audits stay out of the
picture.
Add to that the question of the ability of local pols to bring home
pork. So, is any one really surprised to see W Va so high in the
rankings?
*Most of the design and all of the construction is contracted out
but the ultimate responsibility lies with the state DOT.
D.A.R.,
It depends on the country in question. Anyway, I wouldn't pick
Italy as typical of Western Europe when it comes to local roads,
etc.
Grotius,
How many of them have you had extensive experience driving in?
TWC: If you're going to continue to support the government
ownership of the roads, then you can't complain about the rules
that they devise, the fact that some parts of the state/country get
mountains more funding than others, what a shitty job they do at
maintaining the roads, how long it takes them to do a project from
time of conception to time of completion, etc. beyond the
boundaries that Dan T. frequently reminds us of.. that it's a
system of social contract, and the "right" or most effective
policies aren't what get implemented.. the most popular ones
do.
Or were you not mocking my assertion that "real" libertarians
support privatized roads?
Hmm, I guess I was thrown off by the phrase "state-owned roads
and highways." So it's only local streets that weren't
surveyed.
TWC, that would probably explain the oddity of the California
numbers. Lots of multi-lane superhighways, and lots of local
surface streets, but relatively little in between. One ten lane
limited access highway will have fewer linear miles than a mixed
system of six-lane highways and smaller numbered routes, even if
their capacity was the same.
That's the sound of 300 million Americans LOL at my foolish
remark.
Don't let the bastards wear you down TWC. That's the same laughter
we heard when we suggested privatizing garbage.
D.A.R.,
Even if I had spent my whole life driving the highways and byways
of Europe (which I haven't) I doubt that it would tell me much
(particularly given my rather inaccurate guesses re: the the Reason
map - I thought North Carolina roads would be ranked far higher for
example).
Anyway, I'd be interested to see any study that compares Japan, the
U.S. and Europe.
With respect to the PA turnpike, it is interesting to note that
at the time it was built it was considered to be an example of some
of the best highway engineering ever.
Today we have refined many of those criteria and observations of
conditions on roads like the PA Tpk have helped.
The problem is that the PA Tpk is stuck with its 1940 alignment and
grade. Some improvements have been made to be sure, especially
adding tunnels etc but there's not too much to be done beyond that.
Right-of-Way acquisition costs are out of sight and in congest
urban section it is pretty well impossible to add any ROW.
Add to that the fact that sections of this road are built through
some of the most rugged terrain in North America. I do not know
this personally but I have been told that the Appalachains and the
Alleghenies present a bigger barrier to road and rail construction
than do the Rockies.
Isaac Bartram,
Every time I drive through PA it seems like major stretches of the
interstate are under heavy construction.
Don't let the bastards wear you down TWC. That's the same laughter we heard when we suggested privatizing garbage.
So, you're suggesting we let organized crime take over the roads
and highways?
Issac -
Good sir, you have been duped by the people of Pennsylvania. They
talk up their state more than anyone I've ever seen. I went to
school there and they were always "Isn't it so beautiful here?" and
"Look at all the mountains," but in my own experiences they have
less to brag about than most states.
It is true that their system is probably older than most, but that
doesn't really make any excuses for how bad it is. They're in the
process of building Interstate 99, and it's just as hideous and
shoddily constructed as the old ones.
The traffic around Harrisburg is terrible, and mostly for 1 reason.
They force all the traffic that is coming from the north and is
taking 83-south to Baltimore to drive THROUGH Harrisburg to get
there instead of bypassing it with a couple of miles of road. Not
to mention you have to take 1-lane "exits" to stay on the same
interstate you were already on. It's seriously messed up, and
ugly.
Pennsylvania is famous for having miles and miles of roadway
'under construction', where one lane of two is blocked off by
cones, cones, and more cones... but there are no workers to be
seen. Then you'll pass 8 or 10 guys working on a 50-foot stretch.
Then a couple more miles of cones until the other lane opens back
up.
Common
jokes about PA roads.
I'm not sure I agree with the ordering of the study, although it
would probably mean I put more emphasis on some factors than
others. It seems like the results are skewed less toward roadway
condition than roadway congestion, meaning small states with big
cities get dinged in the rankings no matter what, and states with
huge expanses of nothingness get pushed up.
Or were you not mocking my assertion that "real"
libertarians support privatized roads?
Not mocking you. Dead serious. Mocking the fact that not one person
in America will take the idea of private roads seriously.
We had one in my area. A 10 mile stretch of High Tech toll road on
one of the most congested freeways in the state. It took years to
bring it to fruition and Bob Poole (Beloved Founder of Reason) was
instrumental in making it happen.
Privately financed
Congestion Priced to keep it flowing
Free towing to get broken down cars off the road immediately
Guess What? The locals, the media, and the politicians bitched and
moaned and pissed and griped and agitated until finally the state
bought it from the private owners.
Prices went up
Maint went down
And now, everybody is dead silent.
The good news is that the entire rest of the world is light years
ahead of the US in private highway construction. Bob Poole has
written extensively about it and his work is available at
http://www.reason.org/poole.shtml
Don't let the bastards wear you down TWC. That's the same
laughter we heard when we suggested privatizing garbage.
Thanks Warren. :-)
When I moved here we had five different garbage companies to choose
from. Then the county decided that was inefficient and assigned us
one. Of course, it wasn't the one I wanted and had been using for
years and was quite happy with. No, it was Waste Mgmt, the worst
run and largest company of it's kind in the US. Naturally, prices
went up.
Unfortunately, when garbage is privatized property taxes do not go
down to reflect that the city isn't providing that service any
longer. Course, the service is often better so I guess that's
something.
Do any of those people actually, you know, FUCKING DRIVE in South Carolina? I'm guessing the roads are "cost effective" because they SUCK.
So, you're suggesting we let organized crime take over the
roads and highways?
Yoos got a problem wid dat?
Based on my so-far limited experience of the Dallas-Fort
Worth area, I'm a bit surprised that Texas roads ranked so
well.
Dallas-Fort Worth roads are extremely congested and poorly
maintained compared to the rest of Texas. I35 from Dallas to San
Antonio is not much better. But get into the back country on state
and U.S. highways and you can comfortably do 70mph for hours. I10
is a good road also.
U.S. 281 from McAllen to Burkburnett is a really nice drive, but
the highway goes to crap as you cross the Oklahoma border.
TWC:
Sorry, I couldn't tell. Sometimes tone doesn't come across so well
in typing. (this gets me into more situations than you know)
Congestion pricing is the shiz-it. Unfortunately, then you get
those loons who whine about how only the rich get to use the
congestion-free roads, so therefore everyone should have to sit in
2 hours of traffic on their way to work. Unfortunately, these same
people would advocate that more people use public transit.
Ironically, if busses used the private congestion-priced roads, it
would be more efficient. People could both pay less AND get places
faster.
Dim-wits
Well, no shit Alaska is number 49. This is the Dalton
Highway and this is the Denali
Highway. These are not "rural roads" these are two lane, major
highways (though to be fair the Denali is closed
in winter). Nothing saying about improving the road system, just an
observation.
But why is NY last??
RM, (this gets me into more situations than you
know)
Me too.
Just can't see the smirk or the other visual cues that help
communicate what is being said.
Idaho roads 10th? It is to laugh. The aptly (nick)named 'Goat Trail', supposedly connecting North Idaho to the southern part of the state, is a nightmare to drive. No wonder there have been several attempts to separate and form a new state. Our only real advantage is having fewer people attempting to travel our state North to South.
The problem with gas taxes is that so much of them are diverted into vanity light rail projects and other public transportation boondoggles that our roads aren't getting the attention they deserve. If we stopped wasting money on rail, which is worthless, we'd have plenty of money to improve and expand our road system.
Bob Smith,
Or, we could stop wasting our money on roads, which are wasteful,
and have plenty of money to improve and expand our rail
system...
=^0
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245