Jesse Walker | May 18, 2007
Remember the immediate aftermath of Katrina, when officials insisted on turning away willing volunteers? According to Dave Strano, a left-anarchist activist who wanted to help out after the recent Kansas tornado, the system hasn't changed much:
Shortly after the tornado, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) took control of the recovery efforts in Greensburg. The United Way became the coordinating organization for relief volunteers but, after orders came from FEMA, halted the flow of volunteers into Greensburg. FEMA demanded that Greensburg needed to be "secured" before the area could be opened to real recovery efforts.
So, as hundreds of recovery volunteers were told to not come to Greensburg by the United Way, hundreds of police from dozens of Kansas jurisdictions were mobilized to enter the city and establish "control."
Reports coming from the recovery effort in Greensburg had been woefully short of information. We made multiple phone calls to the United Way and other aid agencies, and were told repeatedly not to come, that "We don't need volunteers at this time." We were told that if we wanted to help, we should just make a financial donation to the Salvation Army or United Way.
The authorities eventually allowed volunteers to enter, as long as they reported to a tent operated by Americorps. Strano and his comrades signed in, then wandered the city.
After a short while, we met with several people evacuating belongings from their home. They told us that FEMA had been there for a week, and that all FEMA could offer them was a packet of information. The packet, however, had to be mailed to the recipients, and they had no mailing address!
More FEMA fun:
In the immediate recovery after the storm, FEMA and local police not only worked to find survivors and the dead, but also any firearms in the city. As you pass by houses in Greensburg, you notice that some are spraypainted with how many weapons were recovered from the home. This is central Kansas, a region with extremely high legal gun ownership. Of the over 350 firearms confiscated by police immediately after the storm, only a third have been returned to their owners.
The whole dispatch is here.
After Katrina, Neille Ilel watched some other anarcho-volunteers lend a hand in New Orleans. Her Reason dispatch is here.
More Reason Katrina coverage here.
Update: Looks like there's a benign explanation for the effort to collect firearms.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
In the immediate recovery after the storm, FEMA and local
police not only worked to find survivors and the dead, but also any
firearms in the city.
I would expect this kind of behavior from a federal agency if it
was reporting to, say, a Bill Clinton who had no use for gun
rights. I guess I shouldn't be disappointed or surprised that it
happens even though the boss man in the big house was put there by
gun rights supporters and is from the party that supposedly is the
bulwark against gun control and confiscation.
And just what statute is it, I wonder, that allows FEMA or the
local police to confiscate firearms?
I was going to make a joke that "control" probably means performing totally unrelated shows of power such as looking for "contraband" - until I got to the last quote and realized that joke isn't funny anymore.
My mother grew up 25 miles south of Greensburg. A large part of
my family still lives there. Greensburg was one of those, rare now
days due to the huge influx of illegal immigrants and the
contracting farm economy, classic American farm towns or neat
houses and churches and shops. The kind of town that you only see
in the midwest in places like Nebraska and Kansas. Crime is
virtually unheard of and people tend to be very self sufficient and
pretty hardy, you have to be to live out there and it is definitely
"out there".
Leave it to FEMA and federal bureaucrats to assume that a small
farming community of 1200 is full of criminals who are going to go
crazy and loot. Must establish control. Forget about helping
people, lets just make sure they stay in line. Assholes!!
a left-anarchist activist was not allowed to wander
around private property until it was secured?
I seem to be missing the problem with that. Perhaps a different
source for the rest of the information is in order too?
Leave it to FEMA and federal bureaucrats to assume that a
small farming community of 1200 is full of criminals who are going
to go crazy and loot.
Weren't the first looters caught some of the rescue workers?
Guy,
The were National Guard soldiers and one active duty soldier from
Fort Riley. They were caught taking booze and cigs from a destroyed
store. Unbeleiveable. The Army is going to kill them. I hope they
enjoyed the booze and cigs because it is going to cost them a few
years at the bar hotel and a bad conduct discharge. Scumbags.
I'm starting to wonder which is more frightening - a mile-wide tornado bearing down on your home, or the idea that after the storm, FEMA is going to show up and "help" you?
The were National Guard soldiers and one active duty soldier
from Fort Riley. They were caught taking booze and cigs from a
destroyed store. Unbeleiveable. The Army is going to kill them. I
hope they enjoyed the booze and cigs because it is going to cost
them a few years at the bar hotel and a bad conduct discharge.
Scumbags.
I hope they get that or worse, rather than just a discharge or
invitation to retire. If the reports were true of course.
At the risk of appearing to defend FEMA...
I think its not unreasonable to ask people to check in, in case
something happens. Also, "secure" often includes things like
clearing downed live power lines and dealing with gas leaks.
Disaster areas are dangerous places, and even trained people can
get into trouble.
Of course, I'm sure there has been a lot of typical bureaucrat
SNAFU. Though I would want to hear from viewpoints other than "a
Lawrence based class struggle anarchist collective" before making
too many judgements. I'd think that was a joke except they appear
to be serious.
Hmmm...not that I'm saying that FEMA is a well-run organization, but it does kind of make sense that if you're trying to organize a large-scale recovery effort you don't necessarily want a ton of untrained people wandering around possibly making things worse.
What does the federal government do well?
Shits on the Constitution better than a coprophiliac's whore ever
could.
What does the federal government do well?
We make some of the best weaponry available anywhere in the world,
and we're not afraid to use it.
aren't soldiers supposed to be the opposite of (the much feared
around here) anarchists?
Soldiers from a nearby military base were busted looting in
Greensburgh. "Free beer!"
The imported cops who "secured" the city let them in because they
were wearing BDUs and had regulation haircuts.
If we ever have a disaster around here, I want the governor to tell
FEMA to fuck off. I'd rather be "helped" by scary "anarchists" than
by the ham-handed and inept central-scrutinizer control freaks
we're passing off as government these days.
Shits on the Constitution better than a coprophiliac's whore
ever could.
That's hot.
We make some of the best weaponry available anywhere in the
world......
Trust me the Federal government doesn't make anything (although
they do print a great many forms and documents)! They
spend tax money to buy...from those much smarter
than themselves...weapons and then find themselves in a position of
being not afraid to use them!
We makepurchase some of the best weaponry
available anywhere in the world from private
contractors, and we're not afraid to use it.
Fixed.
I will say one thing in defense of FEMA. If it is the case that they are seizing unattended weapons from debris and holding them until the rightful owners show up to claim them, then I don't have a problem with it. I can see where weapons scattered over hell's half acre is a problem and you are doing the owners a favor by policing them up. It is not clear if that is what is going on here.
Trust me the Federal government doesn't make anything . .
.
Literally true.
However, most of these amazing gadgets are developed with federal
dollars and from federal specifications, with the feds having
substantial ownerhip rights of all derived IP.
The sub-contractors need permission to sell to anyone other than
the feds (with said permission frequently tied to the political
motiviations of the current adminstration).
So the feds don't make anything, but many things wouldn't exist
without the feds either.
Also given the flow of people between government agencies, military organizations, military sub-contractors, and third-party lobbying groups, it is not particularly obvious where the federal government actually ends.
I read a pretty cool story this morning about a Greensburg alum involved in the golfing world, had heard that all the equipment for the high school golf team had been destroyed just 4 days before a regional tournament. He contacted Titleist who got the kids specs. and shipped out equipment, some of which had to be custom made, for next day delivery. Pretty trivial stuff, but still pretty cool to my mind.
Also given the flow of people between government agencies,
military organizations, military sub-contractors, and third-party
lobbying groups, it is not particularly obvious where the federal
government actually ends.
It begins at the Congress authorizing funds and ends at the
signature authority of a federal officer. No contractor can
authorize a federal expenditure.
Not as complicated as those crafty media types wish you to
believe.
FEMA sucks. FEMA has always sucked. It's arbitrary,
bureaucratic, and frequently useless. The whole Katrina political
nonsense aside, FEMA sucked then, too.
Bovard trashed FEMA like crazy during and after the Clinton years.
I have a friend who used to deal with FEMA professionally (back in
the 90s) who has only terrible things to say about the
organization.
FEMA is hamstrung by the fact that simply because they're part
of the government, people will hold them to impossible
standards.
Consider that when New Orleans was destroyed by natural disaster,
only something like 2,000 people died. That's an extremely small
percentage of the people in that area but don't think that the
various government agencies that were responsible for the keeping
the loss of life very low will ever get any credit.
Consider that when New Orleans was destroyed by natural
disaster, only something like 2,000 people died. That's an
extremely small percentage of the people in that area but don't
think that the various government agencies that were responsible
for the keeping the loss of life very low will ever get any
credit.
Don't forget, the very first pictures of rescues there were those
orange and white helicopters from that Coast Guard portion of
Homeland Security.
The Star Trek school of critics seem to think that transporters and
tractor beams should have been used.
Consider that when New Orleans was destroyed by natural
disaster, only something like 2,000 people died. That's an
extremely small percentage of the people in that area but don't
think that the various government agencies that were responsible
for the keeping the loss of life very low will ever get any
credit.
Damn straight. Have you losertarians already forgotten the
inspiring scenes of National Guardsmen swimming through the
stormwaters to pluck little children from the slime? And who knows
how many cases of food poisoning and cholera were averted by the
government's turning back volunteers driving to New Orleans with
food, water and other supplies?
Various state and local government players were responsible
before the mess in New Orleans for making conditions there so ripe
for disaster. The chaos and the failings since then are not, in my
mind, particularly the fault of the government. Fixing something
like that isn't easy.
FEMA still sucks, however.
FEMA still sucks, however.
Those $2,000 ATM cards saved more lives than I can count.
"FEMA is hamstrung by the fact that simply because they're
part of the government, people will hold them to impossible
standards."
Yes, because we all know that suspending people's civil rights and
body-slamming little old ladies who are just fine,
thankyouverymuch, instead of, say, helping to clean up the mess is
an impossibly high standard.
Look, if the Feebs aren't able to actually help out, then at least
you'd think they could get out of the way.
Jennifer, Dan T. has no hope of winning that title. Your real competitor is Urkobold.
suspending people's civil rights and body-slamming little old ladies who are just fine, thankyouverymuch, instead of, say, helping to clean up the mess is an impossibly high standard.
Hey? What happened to the rest of my last post? I pointed out that it's all part of the social contract, and if the little old ladies didn't like how the government was acting they were perfectly free to move to a community more to their liking.
URKOBOLD ACCEPTS THOREAU'S CRINGING PLEA TO OFFER FEALTY TO THE
URKOBOLD AND LOOKS FOR A NEW WAR.
HOWEVER, URKOBOLD DESIRES NO WAR WITH JENNIFER, HAVING A WEAK SPOT
FOR BOUNCY, BOUNCY PHONE SEX WORKERS.
This is what happens when Republicans inherit a system created
by Democrats: totalitarian nannyism. For all those amazed that a
Republican administration is showing no respect for gun rights,
remember that they only talk about gun rights in terms of
"heritage" and hunting. A quick look at their foreign policy of
macro and micro disarmament shows that they don't want yokels
anywhere to have guns if they can help it.
I don't know whether to be pissed at the Democrats for being so
naive or the Republicans for being themselves.
HOWEVER, URKOBOLD DESIRES NO WAR WITH JENNIFER, HAVING A
WEAK SPOT FOR BOUNCY, BOUNCY PHONE SEX WORKERS.
Not to mention knowing better than to start a fight he CANNOT
win.
DID YOU SPEAK? ALL URKOBOLD SEES IS BOUNCY, BOUNCY.
BEAR YOUNG AND REPENT! OR BARE YOUNG AND REPENT--URKOBOLD IS
PRO-CHOICE IN THAT REGARD.
The war is ON, Urkobold. If that is indeed your real name. And the "bare young" thing is EXACTLY how I paid for college, remember?
For once Dan T does make a good point. FEMA is held to impossible standards. Yeah, there were lots of stupid things done during Katrina, but it was an enormous operation. There would have been stupidity no matter how well it was run. Further, the fact that the largest and one of the most powerful hurricane's ever hit the gulf coast in a heavily polulated area and busted the levies in New Orleans and only managed to kill 2000 people is a miracle. Back in the day hurricane's like that killed 10s of thousands even though the population on the gulf coast wasn't even a quarter of what it is now. But we live in a world of 24 hour news where anyone who misses lunch is "starving", anyone who stays in their below sea level home despite being told to get out is a "victim of government incompetance" and anyone inconvienced by a diaster bigger than a nuclear weapon going off is only inconvienced because their government failed them.
There is only one Presidential candidate who is talking about
this. FEMA used to be an overweight organization that managed a
small measure of effectiveness. Then it got shoved under the
Homeland Security umbrella, and now it's just a bloated mountain of
lard whose every attempt at movement crushes those too slow to
avoid it.
I would give the name of that candidate, but Reason would think I'm
just comment spamming, so I won't. But if we want to get away from
a government that thinks that the priority in emergencies is to
confiscate guns, then we need to get him elected.
the fact that the largest and one of the most powerful
hurricane's ever hit the gulf coast in a heavily polulated area and
busted the levies in New Orleans and only managed to kill 2000
people is a miracle. Back in the day hurricane's like that killed
10s of thousands even though the population on the gulf coast
wasn't even a quarter of what it is now.
But not a miracle the government wrought; it had more to do with a
combination of "accurate forecasts and ample warnings to leave
before the storm struck" combined with "those with the means and
the wisdom to leave did so." The reason hurricanes were so deadly
"back in the day" is that nobody had any idea they were even coming
until they struck.
I'm kinda with Jammer on this one. FEMA most probably does suck,
but in this case the observations cited don't really strike me as a
slam dunk case for the prosecution.
Alternative scenario: FEMA/state police allow anarchist volunteer
relief workers who don't know shit about relief work and various
other lookee-loos to comb the area immediately after the storm.
Some end up in the emergency rooms of neighboring towns, a few die,
additional looting occurs. FEMA gets pilloried for not managing the
scene properly.
Also, the gun thing doesn't strike me as a massive rights
abridgement, for the reasons pointed out by John. The fact that
only one-third of the guns have been returned thus far doesn't stir
much outrage either. Most of these people are probably living some
distance away from Greensburg right now, and have matters more
immediately pressing to attend to than recovering their guns. Hell,
the fact that their guns have been sequestered is spray-painted
right on the front of their houses, so it doesn't strike me as some
sort of sinister gun grab on the part of the feds.
Some of the language in that post is pretty entertaining
ideologically, but I do salute Mr. Spano's efforts to at least do
something to provide relief.
The fact that only one-third of the guns have been returned
thus far doesn't stir much outrage either. Most of these people are
probably living some distance away from Greensburg right now, and
have matters more immediately pressing to attend to than recovering
their guns. Hell, the fact that their guns have been sequestered is
spray-painted right on the front of their houses, so it doesn't
strike me as some sort of sinister gun grab on the part of the
feds.
I have not yet heard of any gun owners complaining that they tried
to get their property back but the feds would not let them have it
back. Does not mean it is not happening, but also guessing Radley
would be on top of that one swiftly.
My wife works for FEMA. She led a medical team that was posted
just outside the storms path well before Katrina hit. Her team went
in when the winds dropped under 50 mph, chainsawing their way
through tree clogged roads hours after the storm passed. There were
thousands of FEMA employees deployed before the storm. There were
FEMA teams in the superdome during the storm. Any news story that
doesn't start out with "Despite massive federal assistance ..." is
pretty much crap. It seems the general public expects FEMA to
actually turn the tide.
As for accepting volunteers, it's hard enough to keep the people
with training safe, let alone hundreds of wackers looking for a
thrill. Ever see what a chainsaw can do to a newbie? Ever step on a
nail? Meanwhile, beside whine, what have you folks done? Get some
training, join a VFD or an ambulance corps and do something
productive.
It seems the general public expects FEMA to actually turn
the tide.
As for accepting volunteers, it's hard enough to keep the people
with training safe, let alone hundreds of wackers looking for a
thrill. Ever see what a chainsaw can do to a newbie? Ever step on a
nail? Meanwhile, beside whine, what have you folks done? Get some
training, join a VFD or an ambulance corps and do something
productive.
Most of them watch Star Trek, does that count?
"But not a miracle the government wrought; it had more to do
with a combination of "accurate forecasts and ample warnings to
leave before the storm struck" combined with "those with the means
and the wisdom to leave did so." The reason hurricanes were so
deadly "back in the day" is that nobody had any idea they were even
coming until they struck."
That and the massive evacuation effort that took out over a million
people in lower Louisiana alone. See Ron's points above. Further,
if FEMA accepted every volunteer willy nilly, all it would take is
for one criminal to volunteer and use their position in FEMA to
commit some horrible crime and all of the people who now scream
that FEMA won't accept volunteers will then be screaming about FEMA
incompetance for taking too many volunteers.
Further, if FEMA accepted every volunteer willy nilly, all
it would take is for one criminal to volunteer and use their
position in FEMA to commit some horrible crime and all of the
people who now scream that FEMA won't accept volunteers will then
be screaming about FEMA incompetance for taking too many
volunteers.
All FEMA had to do was get the hell out of the way of those who
would actually help. And would that mythical criminal FEMA
volunteer be worse than the real-life military looters?
"All FEMA had to do was get the hell out of the way of those who
would actually help."
Give me a break. Which is it, is FEMA incompetant because it didn't
get there fast enough or because it didn't "get out of the way of
those who would actually help"? It can't be both. Katrina was a
disaster of unimaginable proportions. It devistated 90 miles of
coast line and two large cities and smaller towns up to 50 miles in
shore. Hattisburg Mississipi took it on the chin and it is not that
close to the coast. Do you honestly believe that the only reason
bad things happened is because FEMA got in the way? That the whole
thing could have been handled on a volunteer basis with no
assistance from the state or federal governments? That is just
nonsense.
yeah get productive or don't criticize the government!
ron, i think part of the issue here is that the government is
interfering with small affinity groups trying to do their own
thing, especially in the face of massive government failure.
it's almost like they want things to suck, thus justifying more
spending increases. (i don't believe this, since i think the
suckitude in some cases, like katrina, was unavoidable due to
several layers of stupid in the local, state and federal govs)
Give me a break. Which is it, is FEMA incompetant because it
didn't get there fast enough or because it didn't "get out of the
way of those who would actually help"?
My main complaint has been with them interfering with those who
would help. In an emergency I don't expect the government to save
my ass or anyone else's, but I DO expect it not to interfere with
somebody who IS trying to help.
Or at the very least, don't have the gall to make things worse and
then tell me it's for my own good.
Jennifer,
Back off, lady, we're helping you. Here, let me persuade you with
this bat.
Typical bibertarianism. Tyranny in the name of doing good.
Dhex, my point was there wasn't massive govt failure, at least
not Fed-Gov. Who do you think owned all those orange helos? In a
disaster of any size small goups just don't do it, they don't have
the logistical support, communications, training, etc. It's why Mom
and Pop stores fail when Walmart comes to town. You need
orginization to scale a response.
Get productive and stop talking out your ass, which is what you're
doing.
"I have not yet heard of any gun owners complaining that
they tried to get their property back but the feds would not let
them have it back. Does not mean it is not happening, but also
guessing Radley would be on top of that one swiftly."
The NRA took Louisiana law enforcement to court for exactly this,
actually.
What you guys don't get is that things are not that simple. Effort without planning and coordination is ussually wasted effort. If the wind blows your fence down, the sollution is for you and your neighbors to rebuild it. If a hurricane hits and devistates a few 1000 square miles and completely knocks out the infrastructure supporting a few million people, not everyone can save their own ass and even hoards of well meaning volunteers are not going to cut it. If anything, huge numbers of people roaming around a disaster area with no coordination or planning are going to make things worse not better.
John, you've got it. Been there and saw it happen. Wackers become victims and you have to haul their butts out, wasting time and equipment. But they mean well....
If the wind blows your fence down, the sollution is for you
and your neighbors to rebuild it. If a hurricane hits and
devistates a few 1000 square miles and completely knocks out the
infrastructure supporting a few million people. . .
. . . then FEMA will find some way to make it illegal for you to
focus on your own backyard and rebuild your own goddamned fence,
and anyone who offers to lend you a hand will get the run-around
instead.
Jennifer, do you have an example?
Yes, but first an admission: I said "FEMA" when I should have said
"the government." That said:
Confiscation of guns, lest the citizens of New Orleans be able to
defend themselves after the cops either abandoned their posts or
joined with the Wal-mart looters
Sheriffs forcing people at gunpoint to turn back when they tried to
walk out of the devastated city
Volunteers with truckloads of food and water turned away while
official government-approved food and water STILL hadn't made it to
those who needed it
...and too goddamned many more to recall.
Does a subject exist that Jennifer has not mastered? She's now an expert at managing natural disaster recovery.
YES, DAN T., YOU PATHETIC BLIGHT ON THE SOUL OF TROLLDOM, THERE IS A SUBJECT THAT SHE IS NOT ABLE TO MASTER. JENNIFER IS NOT THE MASTER OF HER OWN DOMAIN.
Jimmy, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that doing things like forbidding people to evacuate a devastated city might not be in their best interest.
Jennifers right in part. The stunningly corrupt LA staties and NOLA locals did some eye-rollingly stupid things, and then blamed FEMA for it. Knowing the other side of the story, it really annoys me.
Nobody's saying that FEMA or the various governments involved
worked perfectly, but it's pretty clear that few here are willing
to give the government even an ounce of credit for keeping the
country's worst natural disaster from being a whole lot
worse.
I mean, people here are seriously suggesting that had the
government done nothing, volunteers would have magically organized
and provided better results. This sort of thinking requires an
almost religious faith.
John and Ron,
Effort without planning and coordination is ussually wasted effort.
Has nanny-statism ever been expressed so succinctly?
What astonishing hubris to tar independent volunteers as "wackers
looking for a thrill" who are more likely to need saving and are
more likely to commit crimes than the FEMA blessed and the National
Guards, who are documented as being inadequate for the task to
begin with, counterproductive with what they do have, and to
frequently commit looting and violate simple civil liberties.
There were tons of stories about outsiders -- not just ordinary people but trained professionals -- who came to New Orleans to help but were turned away by one agency or another. This was not standard operating procedure in the past.
Which is it, is FEMA incompetant because it didn't get there fast enough or because it didn't "get out of the way of those who would actually help"? It can't be both.
Why, yes! Yes, it can be both! They are incompetent and
bureaucratically slow, and they didn't permit groups of volunteers
to help. The only thing that they did competently was keep anyone
else from helping.
I cannot fathom why FEMA and the National Guards cannot work
alongside irregular volunteers. Yes, there will be criminal
opportunists. There are criminal opportunists in FEMA and the
Guards. Having irregulars there will provide extra eyes to watch
the watchmen, as well as each other.
What is the historical precedent to support this "order at all
costs" approach to disaster recovery? We certainly now have
precedent for why not to use such an approach.
Meanwhile, beside whine, what have you folks done? Get some training, join a VFD or an ambulance corps and do something productive.
Some of us are taxed like hell to pay for the bang-up job FEMA
does. Right now, in NOLA, FEMA (yes they are still there) pays
$1000s monthly per apartment to house employees brought in from
other parts of the country to work. This is on top of salaries and
expenses which include paid parking, food and utilities.
I will say that a few of those employees are generous with their
expense money- my son in law parks cars for them.
TWC- can you do our taxes next year? Gotta get the bill down. I've
done enough for FEMA and its ilk and they don't pay my utility
bills. At TX summer rates, I need to keep more of my cash. ;o)
Jennifer | May 18, 2007, 2:59pm | #
Jimmy, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that doing things
like forbidding people to evacuate a devastated city might not be
in their best interest.
Um, I wasn't arguing against that. I'm sure there's plenty of
readers that you can discuss that with.
I was simply stating that 'women know more than men' ;)
Remember when FEMA was going to be at the center of ushering in the New World Order? Now we know they couldn't organize a gangbang at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch. Kind of takes the shine off of X-Files reruns don't it.
There were tons of stories about outsiders -- not just
ordinary people but trained professionals -- who came to New
Orleans to help but were turned away by one agency or another. This
was not standard operating procedure in the past.
Well, you'd hope FEMA would be spending their time trying to rescue
and shelter people and keep the general peace instead of trying to
figure out what to do with a bunch of people who show up wanting to
help.
I mean, resources were scarce and they were trying to get people
out of a dangerous disaster zone...why would they want to send
untrained, unaccounted-for people into the zone, however good
intentioned they might be?
Rimfax, since you mention hubris I think it's fair to point out
that I've been a volunteer fireman since 1976, got a MS in chem in
84 and have worked in industrial and regional hazmat teams ever
since. My wife is an ER MD I met doing mountain search and rescue
in the late 80's. I'm teaching an incident command class
tomorrow.
She's been working with a FEMA team since a few days after 911 and
she was deployed to Katrina for months. I've been to national
conferences with her and got to meet many of the other FEMA teams
that were deployed, and listened to their stories over dinner and
beer, etc, illustrated with digital pics and video clips on
laptops.
Your qualifications are what exactly?
I'm sick to death of listening to Cliff Claven clones pontificate
about how FEMA screwed up. Talk about hubris.
And theres no good reason for the ignorance. The local fire and
ambulance services are begging for new members. Most community
colleges have EMT classes. There's a wealth of ICS training
availible on line, much of it through FEMAs website.
I've been to national conferences with her and got to meet
many of the other FEMA teams that were deployed, and listened to
their stories over dinner and beer, etc, illustrated with digital
pics and video clips on laptops.
Whoa! You went to a national conference and listen to shoptalk?
Well, that clearly negates any criticism one might have
about FEMA.
Did you hear, everybody? FEMA workers know how to use a digital
camera and put videos on a laptop! That means tales of their
incompetence can't possibly be true.
Well, they were there. They have the pics to prove it. My wife
was there. I've been though most of the FEMA training with her. You
were in CT doing what?
Chatting on the phone, perhaps?
Going into a big disaster is more dangerous than going into a
structure fire, and yet these armchair theorists can tell you just
how it's done, and scoff at the ones who really did it.
Has nanny-statism ever been expressed so
succinctly?
Good Lord, man get a grip. FEMA and other agencies might have done
a better job of dealing with volunteers, but simply allowing them
into the disaster area with no coordination was no solution either.
Even a barn-raising requires someone to direct traffic.
Any %$%*%^ football coach will tell you that all the effort in the
word won't do squat if you don't act like a team.
Going into a big disaster is more dangerous than going into
a structure fire, and yet these armchair theorists can tell you
just how it's done, and scoff at the ones who really did
it.
No, I'm scoffing at the ones who said "We're the only ones allowed
to do it, and even though we're not doing a good job we will refuse
help on behalf of those to whom it is offered."
Even a barn-raising requires someone to direct
traffic.
And it absolutely has to be someone from the government. Nobody
else is smart enough, right? And if the government fucks up, nobody
else is allowed to step up to the plate.
Jennifer, when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
We get it - you simply cannot bring yourself to acknowledge any
good done by the government. Duly noted.
My point is you'd be a fool enter a disaster area without a
plan. Freelancing gets people killed. Contrary to popular opinion,
FEMA had a plan, one that worked pretty well. Unfortunetly like I
said, it seems the general public wanted them to stop the tide.
Other groups were there. Salvation Army for one. They had a plan.
If you want to help, join a team that can actually support a rescue
effort and become part of someones plan.
And yes, you were scoffing at the ones who actually did it. Most of
the men and women I know from FEMA are ER docs, with a generous
portion of fire chiefs thrown in, along with at least one EE who
sets up communications. Smart, honest people who gave a lot of
their time, for a GS grade well below their normal salary, and
you're belittling them.
Meanwhile, your expertise in this is what? You watch TV? You saw
Backdraft?
DAN T., YOU SQUIRREL-LIKE THING, DON'T YOU KNOW THAT WHEN
JENNIFER STOPS DIGGING HER HOLE, SHE INTENDS TO THROW YOU INTO IT?
AND THEN REFILL IT?
URKOBOLD WOULD SIMPLY ALLOW HER TO KEEP DIGGING AND STOP PROVOKING
HER WITH STATEMENTS ABOUT STOPPING.
Even as a liberal Democrat, the FEMA comments are too critical.
I drove to Greensburg that same night--270 miles away. It was/is my
hometown. Since I was there, I'd like to add to the
discussion.
FEMA does have to ensure that helpers aren't killed trying to help,
falling stuff, electrocution, gas lines, etc.
Also, they were searching for survivors and found one a day or two
later!
But FEMA was slow to allow residents like my parents to get in, in
my opinion. They seemed about a day late in allowing residents back
in.
For once the Urkobold speaks truth. The silence you hear is the sound of raw dirt doing nothing, as it's already filled the lungs it was destined to stifle.
Ron,
When you get back from supper, please take time to read this report
regarding FEMA and it's failures in New Orleans and tell us your
informed opinion on it.
To quote parts of the intro:
When the levees broke, pundits pointed fingers everywhere. Most concluded that the Federal Emergency Management Agency hadn't done enough to evacuate people or bring them aid, but in the end, it was the agency's sins of commission, not omission, that made its response so disastrous.
As Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco complained, "No one, it seems, even those at the highest level, seems to be able to break through the bureaucracy."
FEMA turned away generators needed by hospitals, refused Amtrak's offer to evacuate victims, and didn't return calls from the American Bus Association. Sheriff Dennis Randle of Carroll County, Indiana, had a team ready to help, but was never able to navigate FEMA's approval process to enter New Orleans. FEMA failures caused millions of pounds of ice to be shipped mistakenly to Maine and Arizona, and firefighters and rescue squads to be sent to areas where they were of little help. A mobile communications unit with a chartered plane sat in Germany for nine days because FEMA didn't return its calls.
...
FEMA's model required both the demands for relief and offers of supply to be communicated first to the agency for approval. Private individuals and local governments that attempted to bring in their own supplies quickly found that FEMA would not allow it.
FEMA actually confiscated medical supplies for Methodist Hospital and fuel purchased by Jefferson Parish, and even prevented the Red Cross from entering New Orleans.
If I were a conspiracy theorist, and I'm not thankfully, I would
say Katrina was a dry run for government agencies to prepare and
get feedback for the coming country-wide martial law and police
state after we're "attacked." This provided training in taking over
and "securing" large urban areas and also a testing the reaction to
and the ways in which the country will be systematically
disarmed.
If I were a real nutty conspiracy wackjob, didn't Dave Koresh say
one of the reasons the government was attacking them was that he
was "revealed" that one of the plans of the government was to use
urban gangs and prisoners to enforce an upcomming martial law? (I
heard it today on NPR, srsly!)
Man, thank god I'm not into conspiracies though lol. That sounds
completely preposterous.
THE PREDESTINATION OF DIRT--URKOBOLD LIKES IT!
YET, YET, I FEAR THE RISE OF. . .ZOMBIE DAN T.!
Kwix,
Are you asking are those accusations true? Damned if I know. Are
there incompetents in every large organization? Undoubtedly, but
not as many as some here would like to think. Were there screw-ups
in a massive ad-hoc supply chain? Probably. Any idea what
percentage of goods shipped this represents, or how soon after the
storm and for how long was the stuff delayed? Will CATO cherry pick
to make a point? They have an agenda.
I know my wife and her peers had all the stuff and staff they
needed to run a couple of field hospitals treating hundreds of
patients a day each. There were many such hospitals scattered all
along the Gulf coast, in spite of massive damage to the roads,
bridges, etc. Did whole towns disappear? Yup. Can we fix that?
Nope. Are the local and state governments corrupt as hell in LA.
Looks that way to me. Interesting that Mississippi didn't have the
same complaints, even though Bay St Louis, and the aptly named
Waveland had a 30 wall of water engulf the town.
Were the $2K cards a bad idea? I'll give you that one.
The rest of it sounds like politics to me.
NACT,
You sound like those John Birchers that infested usenet back in the
90's. Is that goofy crap still floating around? Hell, everyone
knows it's really the "grays". (grin)
And it absolutely has to be someone from the government.
Nobody else is smart enough, right? And if the government fucks up,
nobody else is allowed to step up to the plate.
Oh for Christ's sake, work with the context, will you? That's not
even close to what I was saying. Consider what I was replying
to.
The Governor of Kansas needs to stop using Jesse Adam Macbeth to write her soundbites. Her claim that the State could not respond because her National Guard units were deployed to Iraq was a pure load of Fairbanksing.
"Those $2,000 ATM cards saved more lives than I can
count."
Last night a DJ saved my life for the first time.
John writes: " Further, if FEMA accepted every volunteer willy
nilly, all it would take is for one criminal to volunteer and use
their position in FEMA to commit some horrible crime and all of the
people who now scream that FEMA won't accept volunteers will then
be screaming about FEMA incompetance for taking too many
volunteers."
Then again, wasn't a high-level staffer at DHS caught with child
porn?
Regarding the collection of firearms in Greenberg, that would
seem reasonable to me IF 1) they were collected from destroyed or
non-securable untenanted homes only and 2) they were put in custody
of local police who, theoretically, would be more likely to know or
recognize the owners.
There's no point confiscating weapons from homes with functional
door locks - those guns are no less secure than they were before
the tornado. On the other hand, if a home's only standing wall has
a stocked gun rack attached to it, it's probably not a bad idea to
get those under lock and key until they're claimed. (This would
probably be more important in more populous area, however.)
If the owners are on-site, then probably all that is necessary is a
reminder to secure the guns. This could be difficult, if the family
car was destroyed and they're getting a ride to shelter at the high
school where there would be no way to secure the guns during
sleep.
And putting the weapons in the custody of locals prevents the
all-too-common case where an ignorant outsider from the Federal
Government treats everyone as suspect, making things much harder
and far more frustrating than is necessary.
Ron writes: "Going into a big disaster is more dangerous than
going into a structure fire,"
Is that a big part of the FEMA training? No wonder keeping helpers
out seems to be Job 1.
Helpers are quite welcome to help. But if you're going to make
someone or something responsible for what the helpers do and
responsible for the helpers safety then that someone or something
is probably going to want to check the helpers out before they send
them in, and maybe even train them first. Make sure they have their
tetanus shots before they step on the nail, make sure they have
their Hep A shots before you send them into a lake of feces.
Teaching them about how to shut off a gas line and to handle blood
bourne pathogens, how to run a radio and who to call for help might
be on the to-do list before you send them in.
And yes, learning what is dangerous is a part of the training too.
Just common sense really, like teaching people to not assume power
lines that are down are also shut off. You'd be surprised how many
people learn that the hard way.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245