Reason.com
Suffrage for the Ignorant
Over at nytimes.com they have finally heeded the cry: "Mr. Sulzberger, tear down this wall!" At least for this week, the TimesSelect wall is down and you can read the whole New York Times op-ed page, including today's article by John Tierney, which urges people who have not been following politics in recent weeks to go out and vote.
Tierney takes issue with the idea that talking politics 24/7 during an election cycle is good for the country, citing a recent study:
Consider an experiment last year, when groups of Coloradans convened separately in Boulder and Colorado Springs to discuss global warming, affirmative action and civil unions for same-sex couples. Before the discussions, the people in Boulder were on average more liberal than the ones in Colorado Springs, but there were also moderates in both places whose opinions overlapped.
After the group discussions, the people in Boulder moved to the left, and those in Colorado Springs moved to the right. The researchers — David Schkade, Cass Sunstein and Reid Hastie — concluded that “the major effect of deliberation was to make group members more extreme than they were before they started to talk.”
If you're reading this right now, you should probably stay out of the voting booth (or thank a teacher). But if you have a friend who still doesn't know what the word "macaca" means, you could do your part by driving him to the polls.
Most Popular Stories
- Here Are the 15 Senators Who Voted to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Conducting Warrantless Raids on America's Farmers (Not One of Them is a Democrat) (5.24)
- When Government Privileges Trump the Rights of Citizens (5.25)
- Rand Paul Amendment to Stop Armed FDA Agents From Raiding Farms Fails, 78-15 (5.24)
- Is the Ron Paul the Best Hope for Progressives? (5.25)
- Friday Funnies (5.25)
Reason RUPE: Public Opinion Survey
- Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit (5.25)
- Reason-Rupe Poll Finds Support for Public Union Reforms (5.25)
- New Poll: Obama Leads Romney In Wisconsin, But Gary Johnson Could Impact the Race (5.24)
- Wisconsin Recall: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42 Among Likely Voters (5.24)
- Reason-Rupe Poll: Walker Leads Barrett 50-42, Obama Leads Romney 46-36 (5.24)
advertisements
Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSSGet Reason E-mail Updates!
Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptionsSite comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.
|11.7.06 @ 5:15PM|#
Speaking of the ignorant, don't most posters here come mainly to have their convictions reinforced within certain well-defined parameters? Whenever some hapless soul comes along with an opinion that falls outside the parameters, he or she is immediately denounced as a troll. Is libertarianism a cult?
R C Dean|11.7.06 @ 5:51PM|#
Edward, we have some dissenters from the One Libertarian Truth who are tolerated, nay, respected.
You just have to be (a) persistent (b) sincere and (c) not stupid all the time.
|11.7.06 @ 6:29PM|#
R C
From what I have seen, (c) should merit automatic exclusion.
|11.7.06 @ 6:34PM|#
Cast out the interloping unbeliever!!!